NCT06364072

Brief Summary

The proposed study aims to investigate the safety, tolerability, analgesic efficacy, and feasibility of intranasal sufentanil/ketamine (CT001) in pediatric participants attending an acute care (i.e. emergency) setting. The study is a part of the clinical development plan for the development of CT001 nasal spray for treatment of acute pain in children.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
155

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2 pain

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2024

Geographic Reach
2 countries

7 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 2, 2024

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 15, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 27, 2024

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 9, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 9, 2025

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 2, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

February 2, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

April 2, 2024

Results QC Date

November 17, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 15, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • Sedation

    Sedation was assessed by sedation score on the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS). Scores range from 0 to 4, where 0 = awake/alert, 1 = minimally sedated (tired/sleepy, appropriate response to verbal conversation and/or sound), 2 = moderately sedated (somnolent/sleeping, easily aroused with light tactile stimulation or simple verbal command), 3 = deeply sedated (deep sleep, arousable only with significant physical stimulation), and 4 = unarousable. Lower scores indicate less sedation; higher scores indicate deeper sedation.

    At baseline and 10, 15, 20, 30, 45 and 60 min after first IMP administration. If a second IMP dose was needed, sedation score was performed at the timepoints relative to first IMP administration.

  • Respiratory Depression

    Respiratory depression assessed by respiratory rate.

    At baseline and 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 45, 60 and 75 min after IMP administration.

  • Peripheral Oxygen Saturation

    Peripheral oxygen saturation assessed by oxygen saturation rate (%)

    At baseline and 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 45, 60 and 75 min after IMP administration.

  • Cardiovascular Stability

    Cardiovascular stability assessed by pulse rate (bpm)

    At baseline and 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 45, 60 and 75 min after IMP administration.

  • Number of Reported Adverse Events

    Number of reported adverse events.

    Through study completion; up to 7 days

  • Number of Adverse Events (AEs) Reported Per Participant

    Number of adverse events (AEs) reported per participant.

    Through study completion; up to 7 days

  • Local Nasal Irritation

    The number of participants with nasal irritation was summarised using counts of participants for each timepoint (30 and 60 min post IMP administration) by type of nasal irritation.

    30 and 60 min post IMP administration

  • Analgesic Effect

    Number and proportion of participants that respond to the treatment relative to baseline (i.e. reduction in pain score to 4 or below). Pain intensity was assessed with age-appropriate validated scales. Ages ≥1-\<5years: FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability), total score 0-10 (0=no pain, 10=severe pain). Ages ≥5-\<9years: Wong-Baker FACES, categories 0,2,4,6,8,10 (range 0-10; higher=worse pain). Ages ≥9years: Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10 (0=no pain, 10=worst pain imaginable).

    At baseline and at 15 and 30 min post first IMP dose

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Treatment Satisfaction

    Prior to Emergency Department discharge (day of IMP administration)

  • Feasibility (Acceptance of Nasal Administration)

    Prior to Emergency Department discharge (day of IMP administration)

  • Medication Errors

    Assessed immediately post IMP administration

  • Maximum Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity Within 30 Min Post (First) IMP Administration.

    30 min post (first) IMP administration

  • Number of Participants That Achieved a 30% (or More) Reduction in Pain Intensity Relative to Baseline

    within 30 min post (first) IMP administration.

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

CT001

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: CT001

Interventions

CT001DRUG

Intranasal

CT001

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Year - 17 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Pediatric participant, age 1 year to 17 years
  • Attending an Emergency Department following an injury
  • Acute pain of moderate or severe intensity
  • Obtained informed consent by parent/guardian and assent from the child if possible and relevant (age dependent)

You may not qualify if:

  • Participant showing abnormal nasal cavity/airway such as:
  • major septal deviation
  • evidence of previous nasal disease or surgery
  • current significant nasal congestion due to common cold
  • Has received treatment with sufentanil and/or ketamine during the last 72 hours
  • Known or suspected allergy to ketamine or sufentanil
  • Critical, life- or limb-threatening condition requiring immediate management

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (7)

Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis

Alicante, Spain

Location

Hospital Sant Joan de Deu

Barcelona, Spain

Location

Universidad Autonoma de Madrid (UAM) - Hospital Universitario La Paz (HULP) -

Madrid, Spain

Location

Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago (CHUS)

Santiago de Compostela, Spain

Location

Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust

Birmingham, United Kingdom

Location

Royal London Hospital

London, United Kingdom

Location

Sheffield Children's Hospital

Sheffield, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Martin Juhl
Organization
Cessatech A/S

Study Officials

  • Stuart Hartshorn, Dr.

    Birmingham Children's Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 2, 2024

First Posted

April 15, 2024

Study Start

May 27, 2024

Primary Completion

May 9, 2025

Study Completion

May 9, 2025

Last Updated

February 2, 2026

Results First Posted

February 2, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Locations