Safety, Tolerability, Analgesic Effect, and Feasibility of Intranasal CT001 in Pediatric Patients
Open-label, Prospective Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Analgesic Effect and Feasibility of Intranasal Sufentanil/Ketamine in Pediatric Patients With Moderate or Severe Pain, in an Acute Care Setting
2 other identifiers
interventional
155
2 countries
7
Brief Summary
The proposed study aims to investigate the safety, tolerability, analgesic efficacy, and feasibility of intranasal sufentanil/ketamine (CT001) in pediatric participants attending an acute care (i.e. emergency) setting. The study is a part of the clinical development plan for the development of CT001 nasal spray for treatment of acute pain in children.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2 pain
Started May 2024
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 2, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 15, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 27, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 9, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 9, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 2, 2026
CompletedFebruary 2, 2026
January 1, 2026
12 months
April 2, 2024
November 17, 2025
January 15, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Sedation
Sedation was assessed by sedation score on the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS). Scores range from 0 to 4, where 0 = awake/alert, 1 = minimally sedated (tired/sleepy, appropriate response to verbal conversation and/or sound), 2 = moderately sedated (somnolent/sleeping, easily aroused with light tactile stimulation or simple verbal command), 3 = deeply sedated (deep sleep, arousable only with significant physical stimulation), and 4 = unarousable. Lower scores indicate less sedation; higher scores indicate deeper sedation.
At baseline and 10, 15, 20, 30, 45 and 60 min after first IMP administration. If a second IMP dose was needed, sedation score was performed at the timepoints relative to first IMP administration.
Respiratory Depression
Respiratory depression assessed by respiratory rate.
At baseline and 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 45, 60 and 75 min after IMP administration.
Peripheral Oxygen Saturation
Peripheral oxygen saturation assessed by oxygen saturation rate (%)
At baseline and 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 45, 60 and 75 min after IMP administration.
Cardiovascular Stability
Cardiovascular stability assessed by pulse rate (bpm)
At baseline and 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 45, 60 and 75 min after IMP administration.
Number of Reported Adverse Events
Number of reported adverse events.
Through study completion; up to 7 days
Number of Adverse Events (AEs) Reported Per Participant
Number of adverse events (AEs) reported per participant.
Through study completion; up to 7 days
Local Nasal Irritation
The number of participants with nasal irritation was summarised using counts of participants for each timepoint (30 and 60 min post IMP administration) by type of nasal irritation.
30 and 60 min post IMP administration
Analgesic Effect
Number and proportion of participants that respond to the treatment relative to baseline (i.e. reduction in pain score to 4 or below). Pain intensity was assessed with age-appropriate validated scales. Ages ≥1-\<5years: FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability), total score 0-10 (0=no pain, 10=severe pain). Ages ≥5-\<9years: Wong-Baker FACES, categories 0,2,4,6,8,10 (range 0-10; higher=worse pain). Ages ≥9years: Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10 (0=no pain, 10=worst pain imaginable).
At baseline and at 15 and 30 min post first IMP dose
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Treatment Satisfaction
Prior to Emergency Department discharge (day of IMP administration)
Feasibility (Acceptance of Nasal Administration)
Prior to Emergency Department discharge (day of IMP administration)
Medication Errors
Assessed immediately post IMP administration
Maximum Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity Within 30 Min Post (First) IMP Administration.
30 min post (first) IMP administration
Number of Participants That Achieved a 30% (or More) Reduction in Pain Intensity Relative to Baseline
within 30 min post (first) IMP administration.
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
CT001
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pediatric participant, age 1 year to 17 years
- Attending an Emergency Department following an injury
- Acute pain of moderate or severe intensity
- Obtained informed consent by parent/guardian and assent from the child if possible and relevant (age dependent)
You may not qualify if:
- Participant showing abnormal nasal cavity/airway such as:
- major septal deviation
- evidence of previous nasal disease or surgery
- current significant nasal congestion due to common cold
- Has received treatment with sufentanil and/or ketamine during the last 72 hours
- Known or suspected allergy to ketamine or sufentanil
- Critical, life- or limb-threatening condition requiring immediate management
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cessatech A/Slead
Study Sites (7)
Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis
Alicante, Spain
Hospital Sant Joan de Deu
Barcelona, Spain
Universidad Autonoma de Madrid (UAM) - Hospital Universitario La Paz (HULP) -
Madrid, Spain
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago (CHUS)
Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust
Birmingham, United Kingdom
Royal London Hospital
London, United Kingdom
Sheffield Children's Hospital
Sheffield, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Martin Juhl
- Organization
- Cessatech A/S
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stuart Hartshorn, Dr.
Birmingham Children's Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 2, 2024
First Posted
April 15, 2024
Study Start
May 27, 2024
Primary Completion
May 9, 2025
Study Completion
May 9, 2025
Last Updated
February 2, 2026
Results First Posted
February 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01