NCT06354179

Brief Summary

World Health Organization considers non-adherence has a strong negative impact on the health of patients with chronic diseases. In transplantation, adherence to immunosuppressive drug regimens associates with late rejection and graft loss making it a critical determinant of patient outcome. The prevalence of non-adherence in transplant patients, including liver transplant patients, can be as high as 40%. Among others, life-long intake and complexity of immunosuppressive regimen make patients prone to non-adherence. For instance, non-adherence is more prevalent among patients with higher numbers of immunosuppressive drugs. One of the most commonly cited causes of non-adherence is forgetfulness and disruptions in routine, with the evening dose of twice daily regimens being the most likely to be affected6. Besides non-adherence, the constraints generated in everyday life by immunosuppression (including timely and regular drug intake) and the complexity of the immunosuppressive regimens represent a burden for the patients and are probably associated with a health-related quality of life deterioration. Therefore, long-term adherence and quality of life after liver transplantation might be improved by using a well-tolerated and easy-to-handle immunosuppressive regimen. The immunosuppressive regimen after liver transplantation is in most cases based on different combinations of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids. While corticosteroids are administered once daily, tacrolimus can be administered either twice-daily (BID) as an immediate-release, or once-daily (QD) as an extended-release formulation. Among once-daily tacrolimus formulations, LCP-tacrolimus (ENVARSUS XR®) is approved for the prevention of transplant rejection in adult liver allograft recipients. It has demonstrated similar outcomes compared to immediate-release tacrolimus BID, in both kidney and liver transplantation. Mycophenolate has only been approved for BID administration, preventing from taking all immunosuppressive drugs once daily. Yet, single daily dosing would probably contribute to better adherence and quality of life in patients receiving a life-long treatment. Although the half-life of mycophenolic acid (MPA), the active moiety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is compatible with once-daily administration, no published randomized clinical study has ever evaluated the efficacy and safety of MMF administered QD. The narrow therapeutic index and wide pharmacokinetic variability of tacrolimus and mycophenolate justify individual dose adjustment by means of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), in order to minimize the risk of acute rejection and the occurrence of adverse events. For tacrolimus, TDM is generally based on the trough concentration (C0) and sometimes on the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), while for mycophenolate it should be based on the AUC of MPA. However, the dose adjustment of MMF in liver transplant patients is most of the time performed a posteriori, based on clinical signs of inefficacy of toxicity. Limited sampling strategies with maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation have been developed by our team for both molecules in adult liver transplant patients to estimate their AUC, which is considered the best marker of exposure for both. Therefore, tacrolimus AUC0-24h can be estimated by Bayesian estimation using samples collected before administration (C0), 8 (C8h) and 12 (C12h) hours after the administration of ENVARSUS XR®, or 1 and 3 hours after the administration of PROGRAF® and ADVAGRAF®. For mycophenolate, the MPA AUC can be estimated using samples collected 20 min, 1 and 3 hours after MMF administration, by Bayesian estimation. Even if limited to 2 or 3 blood samples, tacrolimus TDM for ENVARSUS® requires late sampling (12h post-dose). To overcome the necessity of a longer hospital stay, microsampling devices (MSD) such as the Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS®) device (Mitra®) can be used by the patients to take samples themselves, at home. Moreover, they are less invasive than venipuncture and collect low but accurate volumes of blood for analysis. In this context, we propose a randomized controlled non-inferiority study to demonstrate that in liver transplant recipients, an immunosuppressive strategy based on single daily doses of LCP-tacrolimus (ENVARSUS XR®) and mycophenolate mofetil (CELLCEPT®) started at M6 post-transplantation is not inferior to XR-tacrolimus (ADVAGRAF®) and MMF administered BID, in terms of incidence of treatment failure (see below) at the end of the first year after transplantation, and to obtain adherence, quality of life and safety data. In order to compare solely MMF QD to MMF BID, patients on ENVARSUS XR® and MMF QD will be compared to a third group of patients receiving ENVARSUS XR® and MMF BID. A direct comparison of efficacy and safety, quality of life, adherence and exposure indices will be performed between ENVARSUS XR® and ADVAGRAF®.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
162

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
24mo left

Started Apr 2025

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

18 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress35%
Apr 2025Apr 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 3, 2024

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 9, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 15, 2025

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 15, 2028

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 15, 2028

Last Updated

March 19, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

April 3, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 16, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

liver transplantationimmunosuppressiontacrolimusmycophenolateadherenceonce-daily intake

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Treatment failure

    Treatment failure, defined by the occurrence of any of the following events: Patient death, Graft loss, Biopsy-proven acute rejection, rejection activity index score ≥4 according to the Banff criteria

    month 12

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Adherence to treatment

    Month 18

  • measuring of quality of life

    Month 18

  • Adherence to treatment

    Month 18

  • measuring of quality of life

    Month 18

  • Appearance Adverse events

    month 18

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (4)

Standard of care 1

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: XR-tacrolimus QD + MMF BID

Test 1

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: XR-tacrolimus QD + MMF BID then MMF QD

Test 2

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: LCP-tacrolimus QD + MMF QD then MMF QD

Standard of care 2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: LCP-tacrolimus QD + MMF BID

Interventions

Patients receive LCP-tacrolimus once daily (QD) and MMF twice daily (BID) as per the usual care.

Standard of care 2

Patients start on XR-Tacrolimus once daily (QD) and MMF twice daily (BID) as per the usual care. At 6 months post-transplantation (±1 month) MMF administration frequency will be switched from BID to QD, in the morning, at the same daily dose

Test 1

Patients receive XR-tacrolimus once daily (QD) and MMF twice daily (BID) as per the usual care.

Standard of care 1

Patients start on LCP-Tacrolimus once daily (QD) and MMF twice daily (BID) as per usual care. At 6 months post-transplantation (±1 month), MMF administration frequency will be switched from BID to QD, in the morning, at the same daily dose

Test 2

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Recipients of a first liver allograft from a deceased donor
  • Transplanted for less than four weeks at enrolment.
  • Without inter-current progressive life-threatening or graft-threatening disease.
  • Having signed a written informed consent for their participation in the study.
  • Affiliated to, or beneficiary of, a social security regimen

You may not qualify if:

  • Recipients of a split-liver transplantation.
  • Recipients of any transplanted organ other than the liver
  • Patient who has undergone colon resection
  • Patients under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship).
  • Patient presenting any contra-indication to tacrolimus or to MMF according to the summary of product characteristics (SmPC) of ENVARSUS®, ADVAGRAF® and CELLCEPT®.
  • Patients in whom everolimus-based calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) minimization is anticipated
  • Patients treated with HIV or HCV protease inhibitors.
  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Women of childbearing potential without any effective contraceptive method (according to the guidelines of CTFG, Clinical Trial Facilitation Group, related to contraception and pregnancy test in clinical trials) or not practicing sexual abstinence.
  • Sexually active men having a female partner, without any effective contraception.
  • Patients incapable of understanding the purposes and risks of the study, who cannot give written informed consent, or who are unwilling to comply with the study protocol.
  • Patients enrolled in another clinical study evaluating drugs or therapeutic strategies potentially interfering with the objectives of the EASY study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (18)

CHU de Besançon - Hôpital Jean Minjoz

Besançon, 25000, France

RECRUITING

Beaujon hospital - APHP

Clichy, 92110, France

RECRUITING

CHU de Dijon Bourgogne

Dijon, 21000, France

RECRUITING

CHu de Grenoble

Grenoble, 38043, France

NOT YET RECRUITING

Lille university hospital

Lille, 59000, France

RECRUITING

Limoges university hospital

Limoges, 87042, France

RECRUITING

Lyon university hospital

Lyon, 69000, France

RECRUITING

APHP

Marseille, 13000, France

RECRUITING

Montpellier university hospital

Montpellier, 34000, France

RECRUITING

Nice university hospital

Nice, 06202, France

RECRUITING

Pitie Salpetriere hospital - APHP

Paris, 75013, France

RECRUITING

Bordeaux university hospital

Pessac, 33604, France

RECRUITING

Poitiers university hospital

Poitiers, 86000, France

RECRUITING

Rennes university hospital

Rennes, 35033, France

RECRUITING

Strasbourg university hospital

Strasbourg, 67000, France

RECRUITING

Toulouse university hospital

Toulouse, 31000, France

RECRUITING

Tours university Hospital

Tours, 37000, France

RECRUITING

Paul Brousse Hospital - APHP

Villejuif, 94800, France

RECRUITING

Central Study Contacts

Caroline MONCHAUD, Pharm D

CONTACT

Hélène ROUSSEL

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2024

First Posted

April 9, 2024

Study Start

April 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 15, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 15, 2028

Last Updated

March 19, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations