NCT06354049

Brief Summary

The purpose of this research is to investigate the delivery of Reiki to integrative oncology patients and assess its potential for improving cancer-related symptoms in this population.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
10

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 3, 2024

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 9, 2024

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 7, 2024

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 17, 2025

Completed
21 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 7, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

November 5, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

April 3, 2024

Last Update Submit

November 4, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Reiki

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Recruitment rate as measured by the percentage of participants enrolled

    Calculated by total number of participants enrolled/ total number of participants eligible and 90% is considered successful for the recruitment rate.

    8 weeks post enrollment

  • Retention rate as measured by the number of participants retained until the final survey point

    Calculated by number of participants retained until the final survey time point / number of participants enrolled. 70% of participant retention until the final survey time point will be considered successful.

    8 weeks post enrollment

  • Attendance rate as measured by number of sessions attended per 6 sessions

    Total number of sessions attended per 6 sessions. Attendance rate of \>/= 70% will be considered successful

    8 weeks post enrollment

  • Protocol adherence rate as measured by the number of participants treated in manner consistent with the intervention

    Number of participants treated in manner consistent with intervention/total number of participants enrolled

    8 weeks post enrollment

  • Acceptability as measured by the patient mean of participant satisfaction survey

    As assessed by participants mean for the Participants' satisfaction survey with the Reiki sessions, measured on a scale from 0 (Not at all satisfied) to 10 (Completely satisfied)

    8 weeks post enrollment

  • Data completeness rate

    Data completeness of \>/= 90% is considered satisfactory

    8 weeks post enrollment

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Patient-reported outcomes as measured by PROMIS-29(Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) score

    Baseline, 8 weeks

  • Patient-reported outcomes as measured by ESAS(Edmonton Symptom Assessment System) scale

    Upto 8 weeks

Study Arms (1)

Reiki therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

This is a feasibility single arm trial of Reiki for oncology participants.

Other: Reiki

Interventions

ReikiOTHER

Reiki, originating in Japan, is a biofield therapy where a skilled practitioner places their hands on or above the body of the recipient or themselves to induce relaxation and promote healing.

Reiki therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 89 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 - 89.
  • Neoplasm diagnosis (i.e., ICD-10 C00 - D49) confirmed in electronic health record (EHR)/Caisis
  • Receiving care at a UH Connor Whole Health Integrative Oncology Clinic.
  • Reporting at least three ESAS symptoms ≥4/10 at baseline screening including fatigue and ≥2 other symptoms on the 9-item questionnaire.
  • Able to speak and understand English.
  • Has an email address, and access to a computer with internet and/or a mobile device with a functioning data plan

You may not qualify if:

  • Significant cognitive impairment that has not been corrected.
  • Significant visual impairment that has not been corrected.
  • Unable to provide informed consent.
  • Active psychosis.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Metastatic disease.
  • Reiki therapy within 3 months of study enrollment
  • Active immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or radiation treatment, or completed within 3 months before study start. Aromatase inhibitors and tamoxifen are exceptions.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cancer Pain

Interventions

Therapeutic Touch

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mind-Body TherapiesComplementary TherapiesTherapeuticsSpiritual Therapies

Study Officials

  • Santosh Rao, MD

    University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2024

First Posted

April 9, 2024

Study Start

August 7, 2024

Primary Completion

July 17, 2025

Study Completion

August 7, 2025

Last Updated

November 5, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

When sharing IPD via open access, the lack of restrictions leads to greater risk of re-identifying individuals. Data could be inappropriately merged with other data to facilitate re-identification.The small study population makes this more likely. On the other hand, sharing IPD via controlled access is burdensome. It requires resources that the investigator does not have (setting up the infrastructure and policies, administering and reviewing data requests, preparing data and distributing data). The personnel time for such an endeavor was not budgeted nor does the investigator have the financial resources to include it in the study budget

Locations