NCT06353542

Brief Summary

Two primary care-based screening systems will be tested to identify subjects with referrable glaucoma to hospital care. Subjects between 45 to 64 years old living in the metropolitan area of Barcelona will be invited to participate in a one-time visit, with an optic disc examination and intraocular pressure (IOP). The criteria for referring a patient will be the detection of glaucoma but with two different approaches depending on which Integrated Practice Unit (IPU) the patients will be allocated to: one arm using an Artificial Intelligence (AI) reading software of the optic disc picture; and the other one will base their referral after an ophthalmic examination performed by an ophthalmologist. In both circuits, an optic nerve head photography will be obtained, and a masked reading center will be established to determine the ground truth for diagnosis. This screening trial will explore the level of agreement between both systems and the cost-effectiveness of each of them. Secondary analyses will include potential diagnostic composite scores (including other ancillary tests, such as optical coherence tomography images, that could maximize the screening process); the identification of population and disease characteristics (type of glaucoma, intraocular pressure) that could increase the effectivity and adherence to the screening process.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
500

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
2mo left

Started May 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress91%
May 2024Sep 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 21, 2024

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 9, 2024

Completed
23 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 2, 2024

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2026

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

October 9, 2024

Status Verified

March 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

March 21, 2024

Last Update Submit

October 8, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Artificial IntelligenceDiagnostic Test: Glaucoma Screening

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Diagnostic agreement between the AI software and the ophthalmic examination

    Level of agreement between the casted result by the AI software and the ophthalmic examination. This will be determined by the reading person (study chair)

    18 months

  • Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)

    Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) assessed by Euro Quality of Life -5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), for each arm of the clinical trial. It consists of a visual analog scale, ranging from 0 to 100 (0 being the worst imaginable health and 100 the best health the patient can imagine)

    18 months

  • Demographics

    Quantitative analysis of age, gender, ethnicity, and family history of glaucoma differences between the two arms

    18 months

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Intraocular pressure

    18 months

  • Optical coherence tomography (OCT)

    18 months

  • Visual field

    18 months

  • Cost-effective analysis of both screening methods

    18 months

  • Risk score with parameters associated with positive screening of glaucoma

    6 months

Study Arms (2)

AI software examination (A)

EXPERIMENTAL

In arm A, the visual acuity, refraction status and the ancillary tests will be performed. The obtained optic disc retinography will be analyzed by the AI software to determine whether the patient was a glaucomatous, suspect or healthy patient.

Diagnostic Test: Software analysis

Ophthalmic examination (B)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In arm B, the visual acuity, refraction status and the ancillary tests will be performed, and then the patients (and the test) will be examined by a glaucoma specialist who will determine the status of the patient (glaucomatous, suspect or healthy).

Diagnostic Test: Ophthalmologist examination

Interventions

Software analysisDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The tested AI software analyzes the optic disc retinography to determine if the patient is healthy, a glaucoma suspect, or a glaucoma case

AI software examination (A)

The ophthalmologist (a glaucoma specialist) will analyze the tests and will examine the patient to determine if the patient is healthy, a glaucoma suspect or a glaucoma case

Ophthalmic examination (B)

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged 40 to 80 years old from our reference population
  • Family history of glaucoma
  • Willingness to participate
  • Signed written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Not signing the informed consent
  • Patients that had a previous diagnosis of glaucoma or any ophthalmic disease that required a regular ophthalmic examination and/or treatment
  • Congenital or childhood glaucoma
  • History of strabismus or amblyopia
  • Known ophthalmic diseases which imply media opacity (cataract, cornea opacities) that might preclude from taking fundus retinographies

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital Clínic - ICOF

Barcelona, Barcelona, 08028, Spain

RECRUITING

Related Publications (3)

  • Hemelings R, Elen B, Barbosa-Breda J, Lemmens S, Meire M, Pourjavan S, Vandewalle E, Van de Veire S, Blaschko MB, De Boever P, Stalmans I. Accurate prediction of glaucoma from colour fundus images with a convolutional neural network that relies on active and transfer learning. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020 Feb;98(1):e94-e100. doi: 10.1111/aos.14193. Epub 2019 Jul 25.

    PMID: 31344328BACKGROUND
  • US Preventive Services Task Force; Davidson KW, Barry MJ, Mangione CM, Cabana M, Caughey AB, Davis EM, Donahue KE, Doubeni CA, Krist AH, Kubik M, Li L, Ogedegbe G, Owens DK, Pbert L, Silverstein M, Stevermer J, Tseng CW, Wong JB. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1965-1977. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6238.

    PMID: 34003218BACKGROUND
  • Tan NYQ, Friedman DS, Stalmans I, Ahmed IIK, Sng CCA. Glaucoma screening: where are we and where do we need to go? Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar;31(2):91-100. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000649.

    PMID: 31904596BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ocular HypertensionEye Diseases

Study Officials

  • Marta Pazos, MD, PhD

    Glaucoma Consultant - Head of Ophthalmic Surgery Department

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Nestor Ventura Abreu, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2024

First Posted

April 9, 2024

Study Start

May 2, 2024

Primary Completion

March 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Last Updated

October 9, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual Participant Data that could identify any patient will not be shared with other researchers. Patients will only be de-identified if a major health risk is detected, or under legal requirement by the competing authorities.

Locations