From Opinion to Evidence: Multi-site Evaluation of Custom Dynamic Orthosis Best Practices
AFOSVA
2 other identifiers
interventional
35
1 country
5
Brief Summary
This study is designed to support evidence-based practice and optimal care by evaluating how different configurations of two types of carbon fiber custom dynamic orthoses (CDOs) influences outcomes following traumatic lower extremity injury.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 2, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 8, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 2, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2028
January 15, 2026
December 1, 2025
3.2 years
April 2, 2024
January 13, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (16)
PROMIS Physical Function
The Patient Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) is a computerized assessment measuring physical function. It is scored using a T-score in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. In a given PROMIS domain, a T-score above 50 represents greater physical function than the population average. Larger scores are better.
Baseline
PROMIS Pain Interference
The Patient Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) is a computerized assessment measuring pain interference. It is scored using a T-score in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. In a given PROMIS domain, a T-score above 50 represents greater pain interference than the population average. Lower scores are better.
Baseline
OPUS Satisfaction with Device and Services
Satisfaction with device and services will be assessed using the Orthotics Prosthetics Users' Survey Satisfaction With Device and Services Score (11-55). Lower scores indicate a better outcome and more satisfaction with the CDO and accompanying services.
Baseline
Modified Socket Comfort Score - Comfort
Participants were asked to rate the comfort of each CDO configuration on a scale from 0-10 with 0 = most uncomfortable to 10 = most comfortable. Higher scores indicate more comfortable conditions, and are considered better.
Baseline
Modified Socket Comfort Score - Smoothness
Participants were asked to rate the smoothness of each CDO configuration on a scale from 0-10 with 0 = most smooth to 10 = least smooth. Lower scores indicate smoother conditions, and are considered better.
Baseline
Numerical Pain Rating Scale
Pain will be assessed using a standard 11-point numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), in which 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable. Lower scores are considered better.
Baseline
Preference - Ranked
The participant will be asked to rank order the conditions they have completed testing for at each visit: at the 3rd visit they will rank order their preference for using no orthosis or using the CDO in the first configuration, at the 4th visit they will rank order their preference for using no orthosis, using the CDO in the first configuration, and using the CDO in the second configuration, at the 5th visit they will rank order their preference for using no orthosis, using the CDO in the first configuration, using the CDO in the second configuration, and using the CDO in the third configuration.
Baseline
Preference - CDO Configuration
For each CDO configuration, participants will be asked to rank their preference on a scale from 0 (least preferred) to 10 (most preferred) for a number of questions concerning CDO use. Higher scores indicate higher preferences and are considered better.
Baseline
Four Square Step Test (seconds)
The 4SST (seconds) is a standardized timed test of balance and agility. Participants start in the lower left quadrant of a Maltese cross setting on the floor and are timed as they move counterclockwise (forward, right, backward, left) and then clockwise (right, forward, left, backward) around the cross. Participants are instructed to move as quickly as they safely can. Lower times indicate faster completion of the test and are considered better results.
Baseline
Sit to Stand 5 Times (seconds)
STS5 (seconds) is a well-established timed measure of lower limb muscle strength and power. Participants are instructed to stand up and sit down 5 times as fast as possible. Lower scores indicate a faster time to complete the test and are considered better results.
Baseline
Center of Pressure Velocity Magnitude (m/s)
The center of pressure (CoP) is the centroid of the forces acting on the foot during gait. The magnitude of the peak center of pressure velocity (m/s) is the fastest the CoP moves during gait.
Baseline
Center of Pressure Velocity Timing (%stance)
The center of pressure (CoP) is the centroid of the forces acting on the foot during gait. The timing of the peak center of pressure velocity, is the percent of the stance phase (%stance) where the CoP is moving fastest during gait.
Baseline
Ankle Zero Moment Crossing (%stance)
The ankle zero moment crossing is the point during the stance phase of gait (%stance) where the ankle moment transitions from a dorsiflexion to a plantarflexion moment.
Baseline
Peak Ankle Dorsiflexion (degree)
Participants completed a biomechanical gait analysis session. Sagittal plane peak ankle joint dorsiflexion angle (degree) that occurs late in the stance phase of gait.
Baseline
Peak Ankle Plantarflexion Moment (Nm/kg)
Participants completed a biomechanical gait analysis session. Sagittal plane peak ankle joint plantarflexion moment normalized to participant body weight (Nm/kg) that occurs late in the stance phase of gait.
Baseline
Peak Ankle Push-Off Power (W/kg)
Participants completed a biomechanical gait analysis session. Sagittal plane peak ankle joint power normalized to body weight (W/kg) occurs late in the stance phase of gait.
Baseline
Secondary Outcomes (3)
PROMIS Satisfaction with Participation in Social Activities
Baseline
PROMIS Satisfaction with Participation in Discretionary Social Activities
Baseline
PROMIS Depression
Baseline
Other Outcomes (1)
Ankle Range of Motion (degrees)
Baseline
Study Arms (6)
NoCDO, A, B, C
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will first be evaluated without a CDO (NoCDO), then in CDO configuration A, CDO configuration B, and finally CDO configuration C.
NoCDO, A, C, B
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will first be evaluated without a CDO (NoCDO), then in CDO configuration A, CDO configuration C, and finally CDO configuration B.
NoCDO, B, A, C
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will first be evaluated without a CDO (NoCDO), then in CDO configuration B, CDO configuration A, and finally CDO configuration C.
NoCDO, B, C, A
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will first be evaluated without a CDO (NoCDO), then in CDO configuration B, CDO configuration C, and finally CDO configuration A.
NoCDO, C, A, B
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will first be evaluated without a CDO (NoCDO), then in CDO configuration C, CDO configuration A, and finally CDO configuration B.
NoCDO, C, B, A
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will first be evaluated without a CDO (NoCDO), then in CDO configuration C, CDO configuration B, and finally CDO configuration A.
Interventions
The CDO will use a modular design that includes a full length foot plate, a posterior carbon fiber strut, and a proximal cuff that wraps around the leg just below the knee.
The CDO will use a mono design that includes a full length foot plate, a posterior carbon fiber strut, and a proximal cuff that wraps around the leg just below the knee.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Between the ages of 18 and 65
- or more years from a traumatic injury below the knee
- Ability to be fit with an orthosis
- Any of the following:
- Weakness of ankle plantarflexors (\<4/5 on manual muscle test)
- Limited pain-free ankle motion (dorsiflexion (DF) \<10° or plantarflexion (PF) \<20°)
- Mechanical pain with loading to hindfoot/midfoot (\>=4/10 Numerical pain rating scale)
- Fusion or candidate for fusion of the ankle or hindfoot
- Candidate for amputation secondary to ankle/foot injury and impairment
You may not qualify if:
- Pain greater than 8/10 at rest
- Ankle weakness or spasticity as a result of spinal cord injury or central nervous system pathology
- Use of an orthosis including the knee
- Non-ambulatory
- Surgery on study limb anticipated in next 4 months
- Medical or psychological conditions that would influence functional testing (e.g., severe traumatic brain injury, stroke, heart disease, vestibular disorder)
- Neurologic, musculoskeletal, or other conditions limiting function of the contralateral extremity
- Uncorrected visual or hearing impairments
- Pregnancy
- Non-English speaking
- BMI \> 40
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Vanderbilt University Medical Centercollaborator
- Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Centercollaborator
- Johns Hopkins Universitycollaborator
- Jason Wilkenlead
- Mayo Cliniccollaborator
- Navy Medical Center San Diegocollaborator
Study Sites (5)
Naval Medical Center San Diego - Clinical Biomechanics Laboratory
San Diego, California, 92134, United States
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
Minneapolis VA Health Care System - Motion Analysis Laboratory
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55417, United States
Mayo Clinic - Motion Analysis Lab
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Vanderbilt University - Zelik Lab For Biomechanics & Assistive Technology
Nashville, Tennessee, 37212, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jason M Wilken, PT, PhD
University of Iowa
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Study participants, investigators, and outcome assessors will be blinded to the condition being tested and will only be introduced to each condition as A, B, or C. Only study coordinators, who will verify adherence with the study protocol (CDO configuration), will not be blinded.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 2, 2024
First Posted
April 8, 2024
Study Start
July 2, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2028
Last Updated
January 15, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share