NCT06352788

Brief Summary

This study is designed to support evidence-based practice and optimal care by evaluating how different configurations of two types of carbon fiber custom dynamic orthoses (CDOs) influences outcomes following traumatic lower extremity injury.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
35

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
27mo left

Started Jul 2024

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress47%
Jul 2024Sep 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 2, 2024

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 8, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 2, 2024

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 31, 2027

Expected
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2028

Last Updated

January 15, 2026

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

April 2, 2024

Last Update Submit

January 13, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Ankle Foot OrthosisCarbon FiberGaitBiomechanicsPhysical Performance

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (16)

  • PROMIS Physical Function

    The Patient Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) is a computerized assessment measuring physical function. It is scored using a T-score in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. In a given PROMIS domain, a T-score above 50 represents greater physical function than the population average. Larger scores are better.

    Baseline

  • PROMIS Pain Interference

    The Patient Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) is a computerized assessment measuring pain interference. It is scored using a T-score in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. In a given PROMIS domain, a T-score above 50 represents greater pain interference than the population average. Lower scores are better.

    Baseline

  • OPUS Satisfaction with Device and Services

    Satisfaction with device and services will be assessed using the Orthotics Prosthetics Users' Survey Satisfaction With Device and Services Score (11-55). Lower scores indicate a better outcome and more satisfaction with the CDO and accompanying services.

    Baseline

  • Modified Socket Comfort Score - Comfort

    Participants were asked to rate the comfort of each CDO configuration on a scale from 0-10 with 0 = most uncomfortable to 10 = most comfortable. Higher scores indicate more comfortable conditions, and are considered better.

    Baseline

  • Modified Socket Comfort Score - Smoothness

    Participants were asked to rate the smoothness of each CDO configuration on a scale from 0-10 with 0 = most smooth to 10 = least smooth. Lower scores indicate smoother conditions, and are considered better.

    Baseline

  • Numerical Pain Rating Scale

    Pain will be assessed using a standard 11-point numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), in which 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable. Lower scores are considered better.

    Baseline

  • Preference - Ranked

    The participant will be asked to rank order the conditions they have completed testing for at each visit: at the 3rd visit they will rank order their preference for using no orthosis or using the CDO in the first configuration, at the 4th visit they will rank order their preference for using no orthosis, using the CDO in the first configuration, and using the CDO in the second configuration, at the 5th visit they will rank order their preference for using no orthosis, using the CDO in the first configuration, using the CDO in the second configuration, and using the CDO in the third configuration.

    Baseline

  • Preference - CDO Configuration

    For each CDO configuration, participants will be asked to rank their preference on a scale from 0 (least preferred) to 10 (most preferred) for a number of questions concerning CDO use. Higher scores indicate higher preferences and are considered better.

    Baseline

  • Four Square Step Test (seconds)

    The 4SST (seconds) is a standardized timed test of balance and agility. Participants start in the lower left quadrant of a Maltese cross setting on the floor and are timed as they move counterclockwise (forward, right, backward, left) and then clockwise (right, forward, left, backward) around the cross. Participants are instructed to move as quickly as they safely can. Lower times indicate faster completion of the test and are considered better results.

    Baseline

  • Sit to Stand 5 Times (seconds)

    STS5 (seconds) is a well-established timed measure of lower limb muscle strength and power. Participants are instructed to stand up and sit down 5 times as fast as possible. Lower scores indicate a faster time to complete the test and are considered better results.

    Baseline

  • Center of Pressure Velocity Magnitude (m/s)

    The center of pressure (CoP) is the centroid of the forces acting on the foot during gait. The magnitude of the peak center of pressure velocity (m/s) is the fastest the CoP moves during gait.

    Baseline

  • Center of Pressure Velocity Timing (%stance)

    The center of pressure (CoP) is the centroid of the forces acting on the foot during gait. The timing of the peak center of pressure velocity, is the percent of the stance phase (%stance) where the CoP is moving fastest during gait.

    Baseline

  • Ankle Zero Moment Crossing (%stance)

    The ankle zero moment crossing is the point during the stance phase of gait (%stance) where the ankle moment transitions from a dorsiflexion to a plantarflexion moment.

    Baseline

  • Peak Ankle Dorsiflexion (degree)

    Participants completed a biomechanical gait analysis session. Sagittal plane peak ankle joint dorsiflexion angle (degree) that occurs late in the stance phase of gait.

    Baseline

  • Peak Ankle Plantarflexion Moment (Nm/kg)

    Participants completed a biomechanical gait analysis session. Sagittal plane peak ankle joint plantarflexion moment normalized to participant body weight (Nm/kg) that occurs late in the stance phase of gait.

    Baseline

  • Peak Ankle Push-Off Power (W/kg)

    Participants completed a biomechanical gait analysis session. Sagittal plane peak ankle joint power normalized to body weight (W/kg) occurs late in the stance phase of gait.

    Baseline

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • PROMIS Satisfaction with Participation in Social Activities

    Baseline

  • PROMIS Satisfaction with Participation in Discretionary Social Activities

    Baseline

  • PROMIS Depression

    Baseline

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Ankle Range of Motion (degrees)

    Baseline

Study Arms (6)

NoCDO, A, B, C

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will first be evaluated without a CDO (NoCDO), then in CDO configuration A, CDO configuration B, and finally CDO configuration C.

Device: Modular Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)Device: Mono Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)

NoCDO, A, C, B

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will first be evaluated without a CDO (NoCDO), then in CDO configuration A, CDO configuration C, and finally CDO configuration B.

Device: Modular Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)Device: Mono Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)

NoCDO, B, A, C

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will first be evaluated without a CDO (NoCDO), then in CDO configuration B, CDO configuration A, and finally CDO configuration C.

Device: Modular Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)Device: Mono Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)

NoCDO, B, C, A

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will first be evaluated without a CDO (NoCDO), then in CDO configuration B, CDO configuration C, and finally CDO configuration A.

Device: Modular Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)Device: Mono Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)

NoCDO, C, A, B

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will first be evaluated without a CDO (NoCDO), then in CDO configuration C, CDO configuration A, and finally CDO configuration B.

Device: Modular Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)Device: Mono Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)

NoCDO, C, B, A

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will first be evaluated without a CDO (NoCDO), then in CDO configuration C, CDO configuration B, and finally CDO configuration A.

Device: Modular Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)Device: Mono Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)

Interventions

The CDO will use a modular design that includes a full length foot plate, a posterior carbon fiber strut, and a proximal cuff that wraps around the leg just below the knee.

Also known as: Reaktiv (Fabtech Systems LLC, Everett WA)
NoCDO, A, B, CNoCDO, A, C, BNoCDO, B, A, CNoCDO, B, C, ANoCDO, C, A, BNoCDO, C, B, A

The CDO will use a mono design that includes a full length foot plate, a posterior carbon fiber strut, and a proximal cuff that wraps around the leg just below the knee.

Also known as: Posterior Spring (Bio-Mechanical Composites, Inc., Des Moines, IA)
NoCDO, A, B, CNoCDO, A, C, BNoCDO, B, A, CNoCDO, B, C, ANoCDO, C, A, BNoCDO, C, B, A

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Between the ages of 18 and 65
  • or more years from a traumatic injury below the knee
  • Ability to be fit with an orthosis
  • Any of the following:
  • Weakness of ankle plantarflexors (\<4/5 on manual muscle test)
  • Limited pain-free ankle motion (dorsiflexion (DF) \<10° or plantarflexion (PF) \<20°)
  • Mechanical pain with loading to hindfoot/midfoot (\>=4/10 Numerical pain rating scale)
  • Fusion or candidate for fusion of the ankle or hindfoot
  • Candidate for amputation secondary to ankle/foot injury and impairment

You may not qualify if:

  • Pain greater than 8/10 at rest
  • Ankle weakness or spasticity as a result of spinal cord injury or central nervous system pathology
  • Use of an orthosis including the knee
  • Non-ambulatory
  • Surgery on study limb anticipated in next 4 months
  • Medical or psychological conditions that would influence functional testing (e.g., severe traumatic brain injury, stroke, heart disease, vestibular disorder)
  • Neurologic, musculoskeletal, or other conditions limiting function of the contralateral extremity
  • Uncorrected visual or hearing impairments
  • Pregnancy
  • Non-English speaking
  • BMI \> 40

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

Naval Medical Center San Diego - Clinical Biomechanics Laboratory

San Diego, California, 92134, United States

RECRUITING

University of Iowa

Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States

RECRUITING

Minneapolis VA Health Care System - Motion Analysis Laboratory

Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55417, United States

RECRUITING

Mayo Clinic - Motion Analysis Lab

Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

RECRUITING

Vanderbilt University - Zelik Lab For Biomechanics & Assistive Technology

Nashville, Tennessee, 37212, United States

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Foot Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Leg InjuriesWounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Jason M Wilken, PT, PhD

    University of Iowa

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Jason M Wilken, PT, PhD

CONTACT

Molly S Pacha, MS, ATC, LAT

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Study participants, investigators, and outcome assessors will be blinded to the condition being tested and will only be introduced to each condition as A, B, or C. Only study coordinators, who will verify adherence with the study protocol (CDO configuration), will not be blinded.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Participants will be cast and fit with either a carbon fiber custom dynamic orthosis (CDO) with a modular or mono design. After being fit with the CDO they will complete testing with the CDO in three different configurations (A, B, C) in a randomized order and without the CDO.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 2, 2024

First Posted

April 8, 2024

Study Start

July 2, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2028

Last Updated

January 15, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations