Comparison of Efficacy & Tolerability Of PEG 4000 Versus PEG 3350+ Electrolytes for Pediatric Fecal Disimpaction
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Childhood constipation is a common but serious gastrointestinal disorder prevalent worldwide. In 90-95% of children, it is of functional origin. Thirty to seventy-five percent of children with functional constipation also have fecal impaction. The treatment strategy for functional constipation includes fecal disimpaction and maintenance therapy to ensure regular bowel movements. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) based laxatives have been recommended as the first-line therapeutic agents. The commonly used formulations are PEG 3350 with a molecular weight between 3200- 3700 g/mol and PEG 4000 with molecular weight of 4000 g/mol. Both are shown to be effective in pediatric constipation management in placebo-controlled trials. PEG 3350 + Electrolyte (E) is more widely used than PEG 4000 for the management of constipation. This might be because of the perception that PEG 3350 + E is safer in terms of preventing electrolyte imbalance. However, because of the inclusion of electrolytes, PEG 3350+ E solution taste saltier than PEG 4000. Many patients struggle to tolerate the unpleasant taste resulting in the high incidence of non-compliance. To date, no pediatric trials have compared PEG 4000 versus PEG 3350+E for management of Fecal disimpaction. Present study has been planned to evaluate the efficacy \& tolerability of PEG 4000 versus PEG 3350+ E for fecal disimpaction in pediatric functional constipation. Patients between age 1-16 years having functional constipation (as per ROME IV criteria) with fecal impaction will be included. Subjects will be randomly assigned to either PEG 4000 or PEG 3350+E at a ratio of 1:1. They will be stratified into 3 different age groups: 1-5 years, 6-11 years, and 12-16 years. They will receive either of the PEG solutions (as per allocation) at a dose of 1.5 gm/kg/day for 6 consecutive days or till the resolution of fecal impaction whichever is earlier. The resolution of fecal impaction is defined as the passage of clear liquid stool and the disappearance of palpable abdominal fecolith. Primary outcome is defined as the proportion of subjects achieving fecal disimpaction in each arm. Secondary outcomes are defined as follows:
- 1.Total no of Days required to achieve fecal disimpaction in each arm
- 2.Cumulative dose of PEG required for fecal disimpaction in each arm
- 3.Proportion of subjects (\> 5 years age) reporting palatability issues in each arm
- 4.Proportion of subjects discontinuing the treatment due to palatability issues in each arm
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Apr 2024
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 30, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 5, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 15, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 15, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 15, 2024
CompletedApril 12, 2024
April 1, 2024
5 months
March 30, 2024
April 11, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of subjects achieving fecal disimpaction in Each Arm
The proportion of subjects achieving fecal disimpaction in Each Arm
6 days from allocation of treatment or resolution of fecal impaction whichever is earlier
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Total no of Days required to achieve fecal disimpaction in each arm
6 days from allocation of treatment or resolution of fecal impaction whichever is earlier
Cumulative PEG dose required for fecal disimpaction in each arm
6 days from allocation of treatment or resolution of fecal impaction whichever is earlier
Proportion of subjects reporting palatability issues in each arm
6 days from allocation of treatment or resolution of fecal impaction whichever is earlier
Proportion of subjects discontinuing the treatment due to palatability issues in each arm
6 days from allocation of treatment or resolution of fecal impaction whichever is earlier
Study Arms (2)
Polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3350 +Electrolytes ARM
ACTIVE COMPARATOR\[PEG 33500+Electrolyte\] will be administered at a dose of 1.5 gm/kg/day dissolved in water until resolution of fecal impaction or a maximum till 6 days whichever is earlier. Fecal impaction Resolution is defined as passage of clear liquid stool and no palpable abdominal fecolith
Polyethylene glycol (PEG) 4000 ARM
EXPERIMENTALPEG 4000 will be administered at a dose of 1.5 gm/kg/day dissolved in water until resolution of fecal impaction or a maximum till 6 days whichever is earlier. Fecal impaction Resolution is defined as : Passage of clear liquid stool and no palpable abdominal fecolith
Interventions
As per treatment allocation, PEG 4000 will be administered to participants at a dose of 1.5 gm/kg/day dissolved in water until resolution of fecal impaction or a maximum till 6 days whichever is earlier. Fecal impaction Resolution is defined as : Passage of clear liquid stool and no palpable abdominal fecolith
As per treatment allocation, PEG 3350 + Electrolytes will be administered to participants at a dose of 1.5 gm/kg/day dissolved in water until resolution of fecal impaction or a maximum till 6 days whichever is earlier. Fecal impaction Resolution is defined as : Passage of clear liquid stool and no palpable abdominal fecolith
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- 1-16 years age admitted to the inpatient department 2. Having h/o functional constipation as per ROME IV criteria 3)with Fecal impaction defined as A hard mass in the lower abdomen identified on physical examination or Dilated rectum filled with large amount of stool on per rectal Examination or Excessive stool in the colon on abdominal radiography as determined by a radiologist
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with drug-induced constipation
- Organic constipation ie, I.Neurological disorders eg. Neural tube defects/cerebral/motor neuron diseases/neuro regression syndromes II.Hirschsprung disease, or anal anomalies III.Known metabolic or endocrine disorders
- Patients with previous gastrointestinal surgery (except appendectomy)
- Children with suspected gastrointestinal obstruction
- Patients taking PEG (either at the time of enrolment or within 2 month before enrolment)
- Patients receiving medication at enrolment or within 1 month before enrolment influencing gastrointestinal motility function (eg, lactulose, loperamide, cisapride)
- Known history of Allergy to PEG formulations
- Patients having comorbidity of any other system like CVS/Respiratory/CNS etc
- Known case of Chronic kidney disease or history of acute kidney injury in past 3 monthes
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Institute of Medical Sciences (IMS) and SUM Hospital
Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751003, India
Related Publications (20)
Benninga MA, Voskuijl WP, Taminiau JA. Childhood constipation: is there new light in the tunnel? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2004 Nov;39(5):448-64. doi: 10.1097/00005176-200411000-00002. No abstract available.
PMID: 15572881RESULTRubin G, Dale A. Chronic constipation in children. BMJ. 2006 Nov 18;333(7577):1051-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39007.760174.47. No abstract available.
PMID: 17110723RESULTvan den Berg MM, Benninga MA, Di Lorenzo C. Epidemiology of childhood constipation: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Oct;101(10):2401-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00771.x.
PMID: 17032205RESULTTran DL, Sintusek P. Functional constipation in children: What physicians should know. World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Feb 28;29(8):1261-1288. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i8.1261.
PMID: 36925458RESULTRasquin A, Di Lorenzo C, Forbes D, Guiraldes E, Hyams JS, Staiano A, Walker LS. Childhood functional gastrointestinal disorders: child/adolescent. Gastroenterology. 2006 Apr;130(5):1527-37. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.08.063.
PMID: 16678566RESULTShatnawi MS, Alrwalah MM, Ghanma AM, Alqura'an ML, Zreiqat EN, Alzu'bi MM. Lactulose versus polyethylene glycol for disimpaction therapy in constipated children, a randomized controlled study. Sudan J Paediatr. 2019;19(1):31-36. doi: 10.24911/SJP.106-1546805996.
PMID: 31384086RESULTTabbers MM, DiLorenzo C, Berger MY, Faure C, Langendam MW, Nurko S, Staiano A, Vandenplas Y, Benninga MA; European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition; North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology. Evaluation and treatment of functional constipation in infants and children: evidence-based recommendations from ESPGHAN and NASPGHAN. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014 Feb;58(2):258-74. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000266.
PMID: 24345831RESULTAlper A, Pashankar DS. Polyethylene glycol: a game-changer laxative for children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013 Aug;57(2):134-40. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e318296404a.
PMID: 23591910RESULTTreepongkaruna S, Simakachorn N, Pienvichit P, Varavithya W, Tongpenyai Y, Garnier P, Mathiex-Fortunet H. A randomised, double-blind study of polyethylene glycol 4000 and lactulose in the treatment of constipation in children. BMC Pediatr. 2014 Jun 19;14:153. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-153.
PMID: 24943105RESULTCandy DC, Edwards D, Geraint M. Treatment of faecal impaction with polyethelene glycol plus electrolytes (PGE + E) followed by a double-blind comparison of PEG + E versus lactulose as maintenance therapy. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006 Jul;43(1):65-70. doi: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000228097.58960.e6.
PMID: 16819379RESULTYoussef NN, Peters JM, Henderson W, Shultz-Peters S, Lockhart DK, Di Lorenzo C. Dose response of PEG 3350 for the treatment of childhood fecal impaction. J Pediatr. 2002 Sep;141(3):410-4. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2002.126603.
PMID: 12219064RESULTBekkali NL, van den Berg MM, Dijkgraaf MG, van Wijk MP, Bongers ME, Liem O, Benninga MA. Rectal fecal impaction treatment in childhood constipation: enemas versus high doses oral PEG. Pediatrics. 2009 Dec;124(6):e1108-15. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0022.
PMID: 19948614RESULTMiller MK, Dowd MD, Friesen CA, Walsh-Kelly CM. A randomized trial of enema versus polyethylene glycol 3350 for fecal disimpaction in children presenting to an emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Feb;28(2):115-9. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182442c0a.
PMID: 22270500RESULTSeinela L, Sairanen U, Laine T, Kurl S, Pettersson T, Happonen P. Comparison of polyethylene glycol with and without electrolytes in the treatment of constipation in elderly institutionalized patients: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Drugs Aging. 2009;26(8):703-13. doi: 10.2165/11316470-000000000-00000.
PMID: 19685935RESULTChaussade S, Minic M. Comparison of efficacy and safety of two doses of two different polyethylene glycol-based laxatives in the treatment of constipation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Jan;17(1):165-72. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01390.x.
PMID: 12492746RESULTSzojda MM, Mulder CJ, Felt-Bersma RJ. Differences in taste between two polyethylene glycol preparations. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2007 Dec;16(4):379-81.
PMID: 18193118RESULTKatelaris P, Naganathan V, Liu K, Krassas G, Gullotta J. Comparison of the effectiveness of polyethylene glycol with and without electrolytes in constipation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar 31;16:42. doi: 10.1186/s12876-016-0457-9.
PMID: 27029340RESULTBekkali NLH, Hoekman DR, Liem O, Bongers MEJ, van Wijk MP, Zegers B, Pelleboer RA, Verwijs W, Koot BGP, Voropaiev M, Benninga MA. Polyethylene Glycol 3350 With Electrolytes Versus Polyethylene Glycol 4000 for Constipation: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018 Jan;66(1):10-15. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001726.
PMID: 28906317RESULTSavino F, Viola S, Erasmo M, Di Nardo G, Oliva S, Cucchiara S. Efficacy and tolerability of peg-only laxative on faecal impaction and chronic constipation in children. A controlled double blind randomized study vs a standard peg-electrolyte laxative. BMC Pediatr. 2012 Nov 15;12:178. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-178.
PMID: 23152962RESULTBoles EE, Gaines CL, Tillman EM. Comparison of Polyethylene Glycol-Electrolyte Solution vs Polyethylene Glycol-3350 for the Treatment of Fecal Impaction in Pediatric Patients. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2015 May-Jun;20(3):210-6. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-20.3.210.
PMID: 26170773RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kalpana Panda, MD, DM
Associate Professor
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- One member of the research group will do the treatment allocation and will not be involved in clinical evaluation and collection of outcome data. Both study medications will be provided by him/her in opaque bottles with identical packaging and labeling. Neither the participants nor the rest of the study personnel will be aware of the treatment allocation.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 30, 2024
First Posted
April 5, 2024
Study Start
April 15, 2024
Primary Completion
September 15, 2024
Study Completion
September 15, 2024
Last Updated
April 12, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share