Loading search results
CMVbreak
Comparison of Two Strategies for Monitoring HCMV Breakthrough Infections During Letermovir Prophylaxis. a Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Trial
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
140
1 country
8
Study Start
January 9, 2023
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
June 2025
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
March 2026
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two strategies to monitor human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infections in transplanted patients receiving letermovir (LTV) as anti-HCMV prophylaxis. HCMV infection after transplantation is diagnosed by detection of HCMV DNA in blood. However, due to the peculiar mechanism of action of LTV, most episodes of HCMV DNA detection are caused by release in the blood stream of non-infectious HCMV DNA. In true episodes of productive infection, HCMV DNA in blood is present inside the virion and therefore is resistant to DNAse digestion. Conversely, when non-infectious free-floating HCMV DNA is released in the bloodstream, it will be degraded after treatment of plasma with DNAse and will not be detectable by real-time PCR assays. Researchers will compare determination of HCMV DNA in blood with or without previous digestion of non-infectious free-floating DNA with DNAse. In patients of the Control group HCMV DNA will be tested without DNAse digestion. If HCMV DNA is positive, patients will stop LTV prophylaxis and receive antiviral therapy with another drug. In patients of the Study group HCMV DNA will be tested after DNAse digestion. Only if HCMV DNA is positive after DNAse digestion, patients will stop LTV prophylaxis and receive antiviral therapy with another drug. The main aim of the study is to demonstrate that, by avoiding inappropriate antiviral therapy during LTV prophylaxis, transplant patients will suffer of lower antiviral-drug-related toxicity. A monitoring strategy able to identify true episodes of HCMV productive infection during LTV prophylaxis will lead to a lower rate of inappropriate antiviral therapy and drug-related toxicity without an increased risk of HCMV disease.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
March 2026
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
January 9, 2023
Actual (reported)March 25, 2024
Actual (reported)April 1, 2024
Actual (reported)June 2025
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
March 2026
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
- Proportion of patients with positive HCMV DNAemia developing antiviral drug-related toxicity.
Antiviral drug-related toxicity will be considered as neutrophil impairment or kidney injury. Patients who exit before day 100 for death, underlying disease relapse, or transplant rejection after detection of HCMV-positive DNAemia will be considered as failures and counted along with antiviral drug-related toxicities for the analysis of the primary end-point occurring at least 5 days after start of preemptive antiviral therapy
Day 100
Proportion of patients developing HCMV DNAemia during LTV prophylaxis.
Day 100
Proportion of patients developing HCMV disease within day 100 and between day 100 and 360 from transplant (key secondary endpoint)
Day 100 and day 360
Proportion of patients stopping LTV prophylaxis and shifting to GCV/VGCV/FOS therapy.
Day 100
Proportion of patients requiring GCV/VGCV/FOS therapy between day 100 and 360.
Day 360
Proportion of patients with persisting HCMV DNAemia.
Day 360
Patients will stop LTV shifting to GCV/VGCV/FOS pre-emptive therapy in case of positive HCMV DNA and subsequent confirmation of productive infection by detection of DNAse-resistant HCMV plasma DNAemia. However, for safety reasons, patients of the Study arm will stop LTV and shift to pre-emptive therapy in case of HCMV DNAemia \>10,000 copies/ml whole blood in two consecutive samples, even if DNAse-resistant HCMV plasma DNAemia is negative.
Patients will stop LTV shifting to GCV/VGCV/FOS pre-emptive therapy in case of positive HCMV DNAemia confirmed in two consecutive samples.
Plasma will be tested after DNAse digestion for quantification of virion-associated HCMV DNA (defined as true breakthrough HCMV productive infection).
HCMV DNA will be determined in blood or plasma without DNAse digestion, as per current clinical practice.
ASST-Spedali Civili
Brescia, BS, Italy
Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo
Pavia, PV, 27100, Italy
Marty FM, Ljungman P, Chemaly RF, Maertens J, Dadwal SS, Duarte RF, Haider S, Ullmann AJ, Katayama Y, Brown J, Mullane KM, Boeckh M, Blumberg EA, Einsele H, Snydman DR, Kanda Y, DiNubile MJ, Teal VL, Wan H, Murata Y, Kartsonis NA, Leavitt RY, Badshah C. Letermovir Prophylaxis for Cytomegalovirus in Hematopoietic-Cell Transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 21;377(25):2433-2444. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1706640. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
Ljungman P, Boeckh M, Hirsch HH, Josephson F, Lundgren J, Nichols G, Pikis A, Razonable RR, Miller V, Griffiths PD; Disease Definitions Working Group of the Cytomegalovirus Drug Development Forum. Definitions of Cytomegalovirus Infection and Disease in Transplant Patients for Use in Clinical Trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Jan 1;64(1):87-91. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw668. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
Fausto Baldanti, MD
Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo
First Submitted
March 25, 2024
First Posted
April 1, 2024
Study Start
January 9, 2023
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
June 2025
Estimated (date passed)Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
ASST-Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII
Bergamo, Italy
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
Bologna, Italy
ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda
Milan, Italy
Grande Ospedale Metropolitano "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli"
Reggio Calabria, Italy
AOU Policlinico Umberto I
Roma, Italy
Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli
Roma, Italy
This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
March 2026
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Last Updated
November 6, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: