NCT06337851

Brief Summary

Surgical evacuation CSDH via burr hole craniostomy appears to be the most widely practiced treatment technique worldwide and outcomes are generally favorable. In previous reports, bilateral CSDH was raised as a predictor of rapid deterioration and worse outcomes attributable to brain herniation, in comparison with unilateral ones. Nevertheless, the optimal surgical considerations in bilateral CSDH still remain controversial. Thus, this study principally aims to finding out whether consecutive removal of bilateral CSDH really poses a complication risk. The secondary objectives of the study were to obtain information about the one-year prognosis of bilateral CSDH and to find factors that affect the prognosis, if any. Inclusion criteria Symptomatic adult (≥18 years-old) patients with bilateral hemispheric CSDH Exclusion criteria Patients with hematoma thickness smaller than 10 mm on either side, and those who previously underwent any cranial surgery Randomization Simple randomization, without blocking, will be used to divide patients into two groups simultaneous burr hole craniostomy (Group-1) and consecutive burr hole craniostomy (Group-2). Clinical Evaluation Neurological examination and scoring systems (Glasgow coma scale and Markwalder Grading) will be used. Radiological Evaluation Radiological evaluations will be made with CT and MR imaging. Operation Patients in group-1 were fixed in supine position with their heads in neutral and flexion position. Bilateral burr holes were made one after another, the dural surfaces were exposed at the same time, then the outer membranes of both sides opened and hematomas evacuated simultaneously. All the patients underwent a drainage system, performed with the insertion of a silicone tube into the subdural space and tunneled under the scalp to the exit point. In group-2, hematoma with a greater thickness was removed first (if thickness was equal on both sides, first incision was made on the right side). The head in supine position was rotated to the side with a smaller hemorrhage thickness. Previously, burr holes were made, the dural surfaces were exposed, the outer membrane opened, and the hematoma was evacuated at one side. Then, drainage system inserted into the subdural space. After the procedure of the first side was completed, as a consecutive process, the head was rotated to the other side, and the same procedure was repeated. The contralateral hematoma was evacuated. Follow-Up Depending on the subdural fluid collected, all drains will be removed within post-operative 36-48 hours. Only the patients with epileptic history and on epileptic medication will receive postoperative antiepileptics. In the postoperative period, a comprehensive evaluation encompassing neurological examinations and CT imaging will be performed. This evaluation protocol will be executed immediately following the surgical procedure, after the removal of surgical drains (usually on the second postoperative day), and at designated intervals of the 1st, 3rd, 6th, and 12th months to monitor patient progress and recovery.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
43

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2003

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2003

Completed
6.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2010

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2011

Completed
12.8 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 20, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 29, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

March 29, 2024

Status Verified

March 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

6.4 years

First QC Date

January 20, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 23, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

DrainageChronic Subdural HematomaConsecutiveSimultaneous

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • The Primary Outcome: Mortality

    As the Primary Outcome, we considered the success of the operation at the end of the 12-month control period (we considered patients who died or were reoperated as unsuccessful).

    Postoperative first 12 months

  • The Primary Outcome: Early Postoperative Success Rate (Redo Surgery)

    As the Primary Outcome, we considered the success of the operation at the end of the 12-month control period (we considered patients who died or were reoperated as unsuccessful).

    Postoperative first 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • The secondary outcome: Follow-up assessment (Age)

    One-year

  • The secondary outcome: Follow-up assessment (Sex)

    One-year

  • The secondary outcome: Follow-up assessment (Trauma-Relation)

    One-year

  • The secondary outcome: Follow-up assessment (Concomitant Pathologies)

    One-year

  • The secondary outcome: Follow-up assessment (The Glasgow Coma Scale)

    One-year

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Simultaneous burr hole craniostomy (Group-1)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients in group-1 were fixed in supine position with their heads in neutral and flexion position. Bilateral burr holes were made one after another, the dural surfaces were exposed at the same time, then the outer membranes of both sides opened and hematomas evacuated simultaneously. All the patients underwent a drainage system, performed with the insertion of a silicone tube into the subdural space and tunneled under the scalp to the exit point.

Other: Simultaneous burr hole craniostomy

Consecutive burr hole craniostomy (Group-2)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In group-2, hematoma with a greater thickness was removed first (if thickness was equal on both sides, first incision was made on the right side). The head in supine position was rotated to the side with a smaller hemorrhage thickness. Previously, burr holes were made, the dural surfaces were exposed, the outer membrane opened, and the hematoma was evacuated at one side. Then, drainage system inserted into the subdural space. After the procedure of the first side was completed, as a consecutive process, the head was rotated to the other side, and the same procedure was repeated.

Other: Consecutive burr hole craniostomy

Interventions

Patients in group-1 were fixed in supine position with their heads in neutral and flexion position. Bilateral burr holes were made one after another, the dural surfaces were exposed at the same time, then the outer membranes of both sides opened and hematomas evacuated simultaneously. All the patients underwent a drainage system, performed with the insertion of a silicone tube into the subdural space and tunneled under the scalp to the exit point.

Simultaneous burr hole craniostomy (Group-1)

In group-2, hematoma with a greater thickness was removed first (if thickness was equal on both sides, first incision was made on the right side). The head in supine position was rotated to the side with a smaller hemorrhage thickness. Previously, burr holes were made, the dural surfaces were exposed, the outer membrane opened, and the hematoma was evacuated at one side. Then, drainage system inserted into the subdural space. After the procedure of the first side was completed, as a consecutive process, the head was rotated to the other side, and the same procedure was repeated. The contralateral hematoma was evacuated.

Consecutive burr hole craniostomy (Group-2)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \- Symptomatic bilateral hemispheric CSDH

You may not qualify if:

  • Hematoma thickness smaller than 10 mm on either side
  • Previously underwent any cranial surgery

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Izmir Ataturk Training and Research Hospital

Izmir, 35360, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Okuchi K, Fujioka M, Maeda Y, Kagoshima T, Sakaki T. Bilateral chronic subdural hematomas resulting in unilateral oculomotor nerve paresis and brain stem symptoms after operation--case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1999 May;39(5):367-71. doi: 10.2176/nmc.39.367.

    PMID: 10481440BACKGROUND
  • Kurokawa Y, Ishizaki E, Inaba K. Bilateral chronic subdural hematoma cases showing rapid and progressive aggravation. Surg Neurol. 2005 Nov;64(5):444-9; discussion 449. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2004.12.030.

    PMID: 16253697BACKGROUND
  • Huang YH, Yang KY, Lee TC, Liao CC. Bilateral chronic subdural hematoma: what is the clinical significance? Int J Surg. 2013;11(7):544-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 May 24.

    PMID: 23707986BACKGROUND
  • Agawa Y, Mineharu Y, Tani S, Adachi H, Imamura H, Sakai N. Bilateral Chronic Subdural Hematoma is Associated with Rapid Progression and Poor Clinical Outcome. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2016;56(4):198-203. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2015-0256. Epub 2016 Feb 29.

    PMID: 26923835BACKGROUND
  • Sucu HK, Gokmen M, Ergin A, Bezircioglu H, Gokmen A. Is there a way to avoid surgical complications of twist drill craniostomy for evacuation of a chronic subdural hematoma? Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2007 Jun;149(6):597-9. doi: 10.1007/s00701-007-1162-9. Epub 2007 May 7.

    PMID: 17486289BACKGROUND
  • Nakaguchi H, Tanishima T, Yoshimasu N. Relationship between drainage catheter location and postoperative recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma after burr-hole irrigation and closed-system drainage. J Neurosurg. 2000 Nov;93(5):791-5. doi: 10.3171/jns.2000.93.5.0791.

    PMID: 11059659BACKGROUND
  • Gokmen M, Sucu HK, Ergin A, Gokmen A, Bezircio Lu H. Randomized comparative study of burr-hole craniostomy versus twist drill craniostomy; surgical management of unilateral hemispheric chronic subdural hematomas. Zentralbl Neurochir. 2008 Aug;69(3):129-33. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1004587. Epub 2008 Jul 29.

    PMID: 18666056BACKGROUND
  • Markwalder TM, Steinsiepe KF, Rohner M, Reichenbach W, Markwalder H. The course of chronic subdural hematomas after burr-hole craniostomy and closed-system drainage. J Neurosurg. 1981 Sep;55(3):390-6. doi: 10.3171/jns.1981.55.3.0390.

    PMID: 7264730BACKGROUND
  • Yagnik KJ, Goyal A, Van Gompel JJ. Twist drill craniostomy vs burr hole drainage of chronic subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 Dec;163(12):3229-3241. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-05019-3. Epub 2021 Oct 14.

    PMID: 34647183BACKGROUND
  • Kolias AG, Chari A, Santarius T, Hutchinson PJ. Chronic subdural haematoma: modern management and emerging therapies. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014 Oct;10(10):570-8. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.163. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

    PMID: 25224156BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hematoma, SubduralIntracranial Hemorrhage, TraumaticIntracranial HemorrhagesCerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesCraniocerebral TraumaTrauma, Nervous SystemVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsHematomaHemorrhageWounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Omer Akar, MD

    Izmir Ataturk Training and Research Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Neurosurgeon, Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2024

First Posted

March 29, 2024

Study Start

November 1, 2003

Primary Completion

April 1, 2010

Study Completion

April 1, 2011

Last Updated

March 29, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Since the International Clinical Trials Registration Platform (ICTRP) became operational in 2007 and we do not have such a clinical trial registry system at the national level, the registration was made retrospectively. The first surgery date of the last patient included in the study was January 2004, and the recruitment period lasted approximately 6.5 years. This policy applies to trials that began enrolling participants on or after January 1, 2019.

Locations