Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Hyaluronic Acid Injection in Labia Majora Augmentation
Prospective, Multicentric, Single Blind, Randomized Study on the Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Genefill Contour® Versus Comparator in Labia Majora Augmentation
2 other identifiers
interventional
110
2 countries
3
Brief Summary
The goal of this interventional clinical investigation using Genefill Contour® CE marked device outside of its indication is to compare with other hyaluronic acid device already marketed for labia majora augmentation in women with labia majora hypotrophy/atrophy. The primary objective is the evaluation of the safety of Genefill Contour®. The secondary objectives is effectivenes of the investigational device (improvement of patient´s symptoms, patient´s satisfaction, sexual function \& pain during injection). Participants will come to a total of 8 visits (including 2 phone calls) over a period of 12 months. Participants would be enrolled in Genefill Contour® or comparator group. An ancillary study would be conducted in a cohort of participants evaluating the increase in volume and distance between labia after HA injection
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2024
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 13, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 27, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 22, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2025
CompletedAugust 9, 2024
August 1, 2024
1.1 years
December 13, 2023
August 8, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean of number of occurred ADEs (Adverse device effects)
Collection of ADEs by patients having received injection with Genefill Contour versus Desirial Plus after 52 weeks of use
During 4 weeks after injection: from Visit 1 to Visit 2 (week 4) and from Visit 2 (week 4) to week 8 only if Touch-up done at Visit 2.
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) assessment by investigator
Week 4, Week 12, Week 24 & Week 52
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) assessment by participant
Week 4, Week 12, Week 24 & Week 52
Patient (Atrophy/Hypotrophy) symptoms
Week 4, Week 12, Week 24 & Week 52
Sexual function Assessment, The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)
Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 & Week 52
Patient´s satisfaction
Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 & Week 52
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Genefill Contour®
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will be injected with the investigational device Genefill Contour at Visit 1, and Visit 2 only if touch-up needed.
Comparator (Desirial®Plus)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants would be injected with the marketed comparator (Desirial Plus) at Visit 1, and Visit 2 only if touch-up needed.
Interventions
DESIRIAL®PLUS Hyaluronic Acid Injection
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Gender: female.
- Age: more than 18 years old.
- Patient affected by labia majora atrophy/hypotrophy as per investigator's judgement and expressing the wish for volume augmentation of the labia majora.
- Patient able to understand and sign the informed consent for study enrolment.
- Patient having given freely and expressly her informed consent.
- Patient affiliated to a health social security system.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or breastfeeding woman or planning a pregnancy during the study
- Patient who had been deprived of their freedom by administrative or legal decision or who is under guardianship.
- Patient in a social or sanitary establishment.
- Patient suspected to be non-compliant according to the investigator's judgment.
- Patient suffering from a severe or progressive disease.
- Patient with history of auto immune disease.
- Patient immunosuppressed.
- Patient suffering of haemostatic disorder.
- Patient presenting with acute or chronic skin diseases.
- Patient is prone to active inflammatory or infectious processes or presenting clinical signs of inflammation in or close to the labia majora.
- Patient presenting bacterial, fungal or viral infection in or close to labia majora.
- Patient with history of streptococcal disease.
- Patient with history of pre-cancerous condition or cancer in areas close to the injection site (external urogenital, anal or vaginal).
- Patient with an actual cancer or presence of pre-cancerous cells (vulvar dysplasia).
- Patient with a known tendency to develop keloid or hypertrophic scars.
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Bioscience Cosmetics SLlead
- Eurofinscollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Cabinet renaissance
Levallois-Perret, Paris, 92300, France
Palais Flore
Lyon, 69006, France
Medical Center "Tu sie leczy"
Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Dalia Quwaider, PhD, MBA
Bioscience Cosmetics
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Single blind
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 13, 2023
First Posted
March 27, 2024
Study Start
May 22, 2024
Primary Completion
July 1, 2025
Study Completion
July 1, 2025
Last Updated
August 9, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share