Comparison of Frenotomy and Frenectomy Techniques for Management of High Frenum Attachment in Adults
Clinical Comparison of Frenotomy and Frenectomy Surgical Techniques for Management of High Frenum Attachment in Adult Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
46
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare frenotomy to frenectomy surgical techniques in the management of high frenum attachment in adults. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does Frenotomy procedure have a lower relapse rate compared to frenectomy?
- Does Frenotomy procedure result in fewer postoperative complications? Participants will be divided into two groups. The intervention group will involve frenotomy procedure for participants and will be compared to the traditional frenectomy procedure in the comparator group. The level of the frenum will be measured at baseline and after 6 months. Pain scores will be recorded by the participants during the first week.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 20, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 20, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 26, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 15, 2025
CompletedJanuary 20, 2026
January 1, 2026
1.7 years
March 20, 2024
January 15, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rebound / Relapse.
The level of the frenum will be measured at baseline and follow-up using William's graduated periodontal probe. The incisal edge will be assigned as a reference point at baseline to measure the frenum level before and after the procedure and identify the change in level.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative pain
1 week
Study Arms (2)
Frenotomy procedure
EXPERIMENTALTwo C-shaped partial thickness incisions are performed on the two sides of the frenum leaving the underlying periosteum intact. Relocation of the muscle attachment is performed by blunt dissection using a mucoperiosteal elevator. Undermining or separation of the epithelium from the underlying lip mucosa is then performed by blunt dissection to facilitate tension-free suturing. The epithelium is then sutured to the underlying periosteum using three interrupted periosteal sutures and is left to heal by secondary intention.
Frenectomy procedure
ACTIVE COMPARATORFrenectomy group (Control): Two full-thickness incisions are performed apical and coronal to the frenum attachment and extending down to and including the periosteum. Complete excision of all muscle tissues is ensured and then both epithelial edges are approximated using single interrupted sutures achieving primary closure.
Interventions
Partial thickness procedure aiming to relocate high frenum attachment to a more apical level.
Full-thickness excision of the frenum down to the bone level and suturing by achieving primary closure.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults with active highly attached maxillary/mandibular labial frenum.
- Systemically healthy
- Non-smokers
- Gingival and plaque index \<10%
You may not qualify if:
- Poor oral hygiene.
- Smokers
- Any systemic diseases or medications that delay wound healing.
- Pregnant or lactating females
- Previous frenal procedures.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
MSA University
Giza, 12566, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nada Zazou, PHD
Modern Sciences & Arts University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants and outcome assessors will be unaware of the recruitment group. The allocation sequence will be contained within sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed packets that the patients will pull. According to the randomization table, the written number on the paper will allocate the patient to the intervention or control group.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer of Periodontology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2024
First Posted
March 26, 2024
Study Start
March 20, 2024
Primary Completion
December 15, 2025
Study Completion
December 15, 2025
Last Updated
January 20, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Data is available
- Access Criteria
- Shared upon request
Study protocol, Statistical analysis.