NCT06328855

Brief Summary

This was a prospective multicenter study. the patients after stroke with were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group. All patients were given comprehensive rehabilitation therapy. During the treatment, enteral nutrition support was provided for the two groups by Intermittent Oro-esophageal tube feeding and nasogastric tube feeding, respectively. Nutritional status, dysphagia, quality of life and depression before and after treatment were compared.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2024

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 10, 2024

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 25, 2024

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

March 25, 2024

Status Verified

March 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

March 10, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 18, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Penetration-Aspiration Scale

    Penetration-Aspiration Scale was used to assess dysphagia under Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study, primarily evaluating the extent to which fluid food entered the airway and caused penetration or aspiration during the swallowing process. The scores ranged 1 point to 8 points. As the level increased, the severity of dysphagia also increased.

    day 1 and day 15

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Body weight

    day 1 and day 15

  • Nutritional status-total protein

    day 1 and day 15

  • Nutritional status-albumin

    day 1 and day 15

  • Yale pharyngeal residue severity rating scale

    day 1 and day 15

  • Patient health questionnaire-9

    day 1 and day 15

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding+comprehensive rehabilitation therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Study lasts 15 days for each patient. The patients were given comprehensive rehabilitation therapy. The observation group was provided the support of enteral nutrition by Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding.

Device: Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube FeedingBehavioral: comprehensive rehabilitation therapy

comprehensive rehabilitation therapy+Nasogastric Tube Feeding

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Study lasts 15 days for each patient. The patients were given comprehensive rehabilitation. The observation group was provided the support of enteral nutrition by Nasogastric Tube Feeding.

Behavioral: comprehensive rehabilitation therapyDevice: Nasogastric Tube Feeding

Interventions

The specific procedure was as follows: the infant was placed in a semi-recumbent or sitting position with the head fixed. Before each feeding, the infant's oral and nasal secretions were to be cleared. An intermittent oro-esophageal tube was appropriately lubricated with water on the head part. The professional medical staff held the tube and slowly inserted it through one side of the mouth into the upper part of the esophagus. The depth of insertion depended on the patient's age and height. After each feeding, the tube was immediately removed, and the patient was held upright for at least 30 minutes in case of reflux.

Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding+comprehensive rehabilitation therapy

Both groups were given comprehensive rehabilitation therapy. The main intervention measures included: 1) non-invasive ventilator treatment, generally at least once every night and typically not exceeding continuous daily usage.; 2) attention to feeding and sleeping positions, with a recommended sleeping position of lateral recumbent and the head of the bed raised by 20-30°; 3) swallowing function training, such as tongue muscle stretching training, assisted anterior jaw protrusion training, lemon ice stimulation to the soft palate, pharyngeal wall, etc., generally 5 days per week, twice per day, 5-20 minutes each time; 4) pulmonary ultrashort wave therapy, generally at least 2-3 times a week, and not more than once a day; 5) physical therapy, such as intensive training for gross motor functions including lifting the head, turning over, sitting, crawling, standing, etc., generally 3-5 days per week, 1-2 times per day, 5-20 min each time.

Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding+comprehensive rehabilitation therapycomprehensive rehabilitation therapy+Nasogastric Tube Feeding

Nasogastric Tube Feeding were used for feeding to provide nutritional support. Each feeding was administered by a nurse using the infant's mother's breast milk through the tube. The amount of each feeding varied from 20 to 100 ml depending on the age of the infant, with feedings given every 2 to 3 hours, approximately 10 times per day. The duration of each feeding procedure ranged from 10 to 20 minutes. The total daily intake ranged from 200 to 1000 ml. Each tube was kept indwelling for 5 to 7 days. When the tube needed to be replaced, it was removed after the last feeding of a day and a new tube was to be inserted through the other nostril on the following morning to continue the nutritional support.

comprehensive rehabilitation therapy+Nasogastric Tube Feeding

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • age ≥ 18 years;
  • meeting the diagnostic criteria of stroke;
  • any degree of dysphagia at admission;
  • steady vital signs, without severe cognitive impairment or sensory aphasia, able to cooperate with the assessment.
  • transferred out within three weeks of hospitalization in the neurology department.

You may not qualify if:

  • complicated with other neurological diseases;
  • damaged mucosa or incomplete structure in nasopharynx;
  • tracheostomy tube plugged;
  • unfeasible to the support of parenteral nutrition;
  • simultaneously suffering from liver, kidney failure, tumors, or hematological diseases.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Nieto Luis

    Site Coordinator of United Medical Group

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
The Research Director

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2024

First Posted

March 25, 2024

Study Start

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion

December 1, 2024

Study Completion

December 1, 2024

Last Updated

March 25, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-03