Dyadic Intervention for Psychological Distress of Patients With Colorectal Cancer and Their Spouses
The Effects of Dyadic Intervention for Young and Middle-aged Couples Facing Colorectal Cancer: A Randomised Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The overall aim of the study is to evaluate the effects of a dyadic intervention on mutuality, psychological strengths (i.e., illness cognition and dyadic coping), illness-related communication, psychological distress, and QoL outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer and spouses. The colorectal cancer couples were randomly allocated to the intervention group to receive a 6-week dyadic intervention, or to the control group to receive the usual care provided by the clinical team in the hospital.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
Started May 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 16, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 22, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2025
CompletedJuly 16, 2025
July 1, 2025
1.2 years
March 16, 2024
July 11, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the Kessler psychological distress scale-10
The scale employs a Likert 5-point rating system, ranging from "almost never" to "all the time" with values assigned from 1 to 5 respectively, yielding a total score between 10 and 50. Higher scores indicate greater levels of psychological distress, with a cutoff set at ≥22 points.
Changes from baseline (T0) to immediately (T1), 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), and 6 months (T4) after the intervention
Secondary Outcomes (6)
The Illness Cognition Questionnaire
Changes from baseline (T0) to immediately (T1), 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), and 6 months (T4) after the intervention
Dyadic Coping Inventory
Changes from baseline (T0) to immediately (T1), 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), and 6 months (T4) after the intervention
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30
Changes from baseline (T0) to immediately (T1), 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), and 6 months (T4) after the intervention
Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Scale
Changes from baseline (T0) to immediately (T1), 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), and 6 months (T4) after the intervention
Mutual communication
Changes from baseline (T0) to immediately (T1), 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), and 6 months (T4) after the intervention
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
6-week dyadic intervention
EXPERIMENTALA 6-week psychosocial dyadic programme comprises 6 weekly 60-90min internet-based sessions.
Usual care
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group to receive the usual care provided by the clinical team in the hospital.
Interventions
Comprising 6 weekly 60-90min internet-based sessions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients and spouses aged 20 years or older patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer within the past year Patients scored ≥ 22 points on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale assessment patients and spouses able to read simplified Chinese
You may not qualify if:
- psychiatric problems requiring active treatment other terminal illnesses, such as advanced cancer currently undergoing psychotherapy or participating in similar trials
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510000, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Qian Sun, PhD student
Sun Yat-sen Univesity
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 16, 2024
First Posted
March 22, 2024
Study Start
May 1, 2024
Primary Completion
July 1, 2025
Study Completion
July 1, 2025
Last Updated
July 16, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share