Ultra-high Resolution CT: the End of Stapes Prosthesis Measurement Misestimation
1 other identifier
observational
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Actual CT scanners overestimate stapes piston size, and do not represent a valuable technique for their follow-up, especially in case of complication. Ultra-high resolution has not yet been evaluated in this setting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Apr 2024
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 21, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2024
CompletedMarch 21, 2024
November 1, 2023
2 months
March 15, 2024
March 15, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
length
length of the prosthesis on CT
february 2020 - novembre 2023
Study Arms (1)
patients who underwent stapes surgery at our instution
patients with otosclerosis who underwent stapedectomy in our institution
Interventions
stapes removal and replacement by a prosthesis
imaging study
Eligibility Criteria
patients with otosclerosis who underwent stapes replacement by a prosthesis and underwent ultra high resolution CT for follow-up
You may qualify if:
- \- stapes prosthesis Ultra-high resolution CT available
You may not qualify if:
- no materiovigilance report available
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Chu Nancy
Nancy, 54000, France
Related Publications (3)
Bozzato A, Struffert T, Hertel V, Iro H, Hornung J. Analysis of the accuracy of high-resolution computed tomography techniques for the measurement of stapes prostheses. Eur Radiol. 2010 Mar;20(3):566-71. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1582-4. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
PMID: 19727746BACKGROUNDFang Y, Wang B, Galvin JJ 3rd, Tao D, Deng R, Ou X, Liu Y, Dai P, Sha Y, Zhang T, Chen B. MPR-CT Imaging for Stapes Prosthesis: Accuracy and Clinical Significance. Otol Neurotol. 2016 Apr;37(4):321-3. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000987.
PMID: 26927761BACKGROUNDGil Mun S, Scheffner E, Muller S, Mittmann P, Rademacher G, Mutze S, Wilms K, Boga E, Bjorn Gehl H, Sudhoff H, Todt I. Stapes piston insertion depth and clinical correlations. Acta Otolaryngol. 2019 Oct;139(10):829-832. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2019.1637019. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
PMID: 31298596BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
romain gillet
CHRU de Nancy
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 15, 2024
First Posted
March 21, 2024
Study Start
April 1, 2024
Primary Completion
June 1, 2024
Study Completion
December 1, 2024
Last Updated
March 21, 2024
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
because CT-scanner are the patient's proprety