NCT06322186

Brief Summary

Massively bleeding trauma patients have higher odds of mortality, increased hospital length of stay, and increased need for transfusion if they become hypothermic. Hypothermia is independently associated with mortality in traumatically injured patients due to its negative physiologic effects on hemostasis, cardiorespiratory and renal function. Current warming strategies increase the logistical difficulty of transferring patients (which is frequent during the initial hours of trauma care) or must be changed at frequent intervals. Prehospital, military, and intraoperative studies have suggested chemical warming blankets as a pragmatic strategy to manage hypothermia. A recent pilot study (manuscript under review) at our institution demonstrated the feasibility of using the Ready-Heat® (TechTrade LLC, Orlando, FL, USA) chemical heating blanket in the initial phases of hospital care in bleeding trauma patients requiring a mass hemorrhage protocol (MHP). These self-warming blankets provide warmth over 8 hours at up to 40 degrees Celsius, carrying the advantage of portability with no continuous electric power requirement. Furthermore, the Ready-Heat blanket may be more effective than current strategies for rewarming patients at high risk of developing hypothermia. STAYWARM-2 will be the first randomized controlled trial performed in-hospital to evaluate a self-warming blanket to address hypothermia in massively bleeding trauma patients within the initial hours of hospital arrival. This study will help to determine the efficacy and feasibility of using chemical heating blankets for hypothermia in the early hours of hospital care. This has potential to reduce the overall workload of direct care clinicians, freeing them for other patient care duties. Additionally, the intervention may achieve enhanced thermoregulation compared to current strategies, improving patient care and comfort, and avoiding the clinical complications related to hypothermia. Findings from this preliminary study may provide data for a future grant to launch a larger randomized controlled trial in the prehospital/in-hospital trauma setting to optimize the care of patients at risk of developing hypothermia.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
74

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 1, 2024

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2024

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 20, 2024

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

March 20, 2024

Status Verified

November 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

February 1, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 13, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Chemical heating blanketsThermoregulationFeasibilityEfficacy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • An increase of 1⁰C at eight hours from the time of blanket placement

    To evaluate the effectiveness of the Ready-Heat® blanket to increase temperature by at least 1⁰C at eight hours from the time of blanket placement in the trauma bay in severely injured trauma patients who required massive hemorrhage protocol activation. Temperature will be measured upon arrival to the trauma bay and at 8 hours from arrival to trauma bay/time of blanket application.

    0-8 hours from trauma bay arrival/blanket application

  • Adherence to the 2 blankets application in the trauma bay in at least 80% of patients.

    Adherence to the application of the 2 Ready-Heat® blankets in patients enrolled in the intervention arm throughout the trauma bay resuscitation. Research personnel will record whether the 2 blankets were applied remained on the patient in the trauma bay.

    0-90minutes (from trauma bay arrival until the patient leaves the trauma bay to the next phase of care - generally 30 to 90 minutes from arrival).

  • Adherence to body temperature measurements (in degrees Celsius) 80% of each of the phases of initial care up to 8 hours following admission.

    Feasibility of body temperature measurement throughout the different phases of care (i.e.: TB, ED, CT scanner suite, OR, IR suite, ICU) within the first eight hours of blanket application. The temperature will be mesured on arrival to the trauma bay, prior to leaving the trauma bay, prior to leaving the CT scanner suite, prior to leaving the ED to the OR or IR, prior to leaving the IR suite, in the OR as per anesthesia standards, on arrival to the ICU, and at 8 hours time point (time point when the blanket will be removed) or the time point when the patient's temperature reaches 37.0 degrees Celsius. Research personnel will request/record temperature measurements at the time of trauma bay arrival and at any subsequent phases of care up to eight hours from blanket application.

    0-8 hours from trauma bay arrival/blanket application

  • Adherence to maintain the blankets applied on the patient in 80% of each of the phases of initial care up to 8 hours following admission.

    Feasibility of maintaining at least one blanket applied throughout the different phases of care (i.e.: TB, ED, CT scanner suite, OR, IR suite, ICU). Research personnel will monitor and record whether the 2 blankets remained on the patient throughout the phases of care.

    0-8 hours from trauma bay arrival/blanket application

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Concurrent warming strategies

    0-8 hours from trauma bay arrival/blanket application

  • Blood product usage

    Within 24 hours post-blanket application/admission.

  • Coagulation parameter 1: platelet count

    0-24 hours from trauma bay arrival/blanket application

  • Coagulation parameter 2: INR

    0-24 hours from trauma bay arrival/blanket application

  • Coagulation parameter 3: fibrinogen

    0-24 hours from trauma bay arrival/blanket application

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Ready-Heat Blanket

EXPERIMENTAL

Two Ready-Heat 4-panel half blankets applied indirectly (as per manufacturer's directions) with two flannel blankets placed under them.

Other: Ready-Heat Chemical Heating Blankets

Warmed blankets/FAWB

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Two warmed blankets (current standard of care) will be applied to the patient.

Other: Warmed blankets or FAWB

Interventions

Ready-Heat blankets are 4-panel half blankets that generate an oxygen-activated exothermic effect in 8-15 minutes (i.e., no electricity required), providing warmth over 8 hours at up to 40 degrees Celsius.

Ready-Heat Blanket

The current standard of care for hypothermic patients is applying two warmed blankets or forced air warming blankets (FAWB).

Warmed blankets/FAWB

Eligibility Criteria

Age16 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age greater than or equal to 16 years
  • Requires massive hemorrhage protocol activation in the trauma bay
  • Admitted to the trauma bay between 08:00-20:00 on a weekday

You may not qualify if:

  • Transferred from another healthcare facility
  • Death in the trauma bay prior to randomization
  • Arrival to trauma bay with ongoing CPR
  • Patients with penetrating head injury with Glasgow Coma Scale of 3 and loss of brain matter through the wound

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (14)

  • Reynolds BR, Forsythe RM, Harbrecht BG, Cuschieri J, Minei JP, Maier RV, Moore EE, Billiar EE, Peitzman AB, Sperry JL; Inflammation and Host Response to Injury Investigators. Hypothermia in massive transfusion: have we been paying enough attention to it? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Aug;73(2):486-91.

    PMID: 23019675BACKGROUND
  • Dirkmann D, Hanke AA, Gorlinger K, Peters J. Hypothermia and acidosis synergistically impair coagulation in human whole blood. Anesth Analg. 2008 Jun;106(6):1627-32. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31817340ad.

    PMID: 18499589BACKGROUND
  • Lester ELW, Fox EE, Holcomb JB, Brasel KJ, Bulger EM, Cohen MJ, Cotton BA, Fabian TC, Kerby JD, O'Keefe T, Rizoli SB, Scalea TM, Schreiber MA, Inaba K; PROPPR study group. The impact of hypothermia on outcomes in massively transfused patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Mar;86(3):458-463. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002144.

    PMID: 30444856BACKGROUND
  • Perlman R, Callum J, Laflamme C, Tien H, Nascimento B, Beckett A, Alam A. A recommended early goal-directed management guideline for the prevention of hypothermia-related transfusion, morbidity, and mortality in severely injured trauma patients. Crit Care. 2016 Apr 20;20(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1271-z.

    PMID: 27095272BACKGROUND
  • Rajagopalan S, Mascha E, Na J, Sessler DI. The effects of mild perioperative hypothermia on blood loss and transfusion requirement. Anesthesiology. 2008 Jan;108(1):71-7. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000296719.73450.52.

    PMID: 18156884BACKGROUND
  • Frank SM, Fleisher LA, Breslow MJ, Higgins MS, Olson KF, Kelly S, Beattie C. Perioperative maintenance of normothermia reduces the incidence of morbid cardiac events. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 1997 Apr 9;277(14):1127-34.

    PMID: 9087467BACKGROUND
  • Slotman GJ, Jed EH, Burchard KW. Adverse effects of hypothermia in postoperative patients. Am J Surg. 1985 Apr;149(4):495-501. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(85)80046-5.

    PMID: 3985289BACKGROUND
  • Phillips D, Bowman J, Zafren K. Successful Field Rewarming of a Patient with Apparent Moderate Hypothermia Using a Hypothermia Wrap and a Chemical Heat Blanket. Wilderness Environ Med. 2019 Jun;30(2):199-202. doi: 10.1016/j.wem.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Feb 26.

    PMID: 30824366BACKGROUND
  • Bennett BL, Holcomb JB. Battlefield Trauma-Induced Hypothermia: Transitioning the Preferred Method of Casualty Rewarming. Wilderness Environ Med. 2017 Jun;28(2S):S82-S89. doi: 10.1016/j.wem.2017.03.010. Epub 2017 May 5.

    PMID: 28483389BACKGROUND
  • Oden TN, Doruker NC, Korkmaz FD. Compliance of Health Professionals for Prevention of Inadvertent Perioperative Hypothermia in Adult Patients: A Review. AANA J. 2022 Aug;90(4):281-287.

    PMID: 35943754BACKGROUND
  • Munday J, Delaforce A, Forbes G, Keogh S. Barriers and enablers to the implementation of perioperative hypothermia prevention practices from the perspectives of the multidisciplinary team: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019 May 29;12:395-417. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S209687. eCollection 2019.

    PMID: 31239694BACKGROUND
  • Torossian A, Van Gerven E, Geertsen K, Horn B, Van de Velde M, Raeder J. Active perioperative patient warming using a self-warming blanket (BARRIER EasyWarm) is superior to passive thermal insulation: a multinational, multicenter, randomized trial. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Nov;34:547-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.06.030. Epub 2016 Jul 17.

    PMID: 27687449BACKGROUND
  • Khayyat H, Callum JL, Hill-Strathy M, Strauss R, Notario L, Nathens A, da Luz L. Compliance with the massive hemorrhage protocol in trauma: a retrospective quality review. Can J Anaesth. 2021 Jan;68(1):156-158. doi: 10.1007/s12630-020-01806-1. Epub 2020 Sep 16. No abstract available.

    PMID: 32936441BACKGROUND
  • Callum JL, Yeh CH, Petrosoniak A, McVey MJ, Cope S, Thompson T, Chin V, Karkouti K, Nathens AB, Murto K, Beno S, Pendergrast J, McDonald A, MacDonald R, Adhikari NKJ, Alam A, Arnold D, Barratt L, Beckett A, Brenneman S, Chaudhry HR, Collins A, Harvey M, Lampron J, Margarido C, McFarlan A, Nascimento B, Owens W, Pai M, Rizoli S, Ruijs T, Skeate R, Skelton T, Sholzberg M, Syer K, Viveiros JL, Theriault J, Tinmouth A, Van Heest R, White S, Zeller M, Pavenski K. A regional massive hemorrhage protocol developed through a modified Delphi technique. CMAJ Open. 2019 Sep 3;7(3):E546-E561. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20190042. Print 2019 Jul-Sep.

    PMID: 31484650BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Accidental InjuriesHypothermia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wounds and InjuriesBody Temperature ChangesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Luis Da Luz, MD

    Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Only the statistician will remain blinded during the final analysis.
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Eligible patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either the experimental or control arm. Experimental arm: 2 Ready-Heat 4-panel blankets Control arm: standard of care (use of warmed blankets and forced air warmed blanket \[FAWB\])
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2024

First Posted

March 20, 2024

Study Start

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion

March 1, 2026

Study Completion

March 1, 2026

Last Updated

March 20, 2024

Record last verified: 2023-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share