Pericapsular Nerve Group Block vs Supra Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block

NCT06321718 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: 04-2023-200629
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 96
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

This study aims to assess the efficacy of PENG block performed with LFCN block in controlling postoperative pain and promoting motor function recovery and to compare its effectiveness with S-FICB.

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• recording time for "return of full muscle power"

  duration between the end of surgery and the first time the patient was able to move his operated leg. The full power return will be defined as pre-operative muscle power according to manual muscle testing scale (MRC)/ Muscle Power Scale as following: Score Description 0 No contraction 1. Flicker or trace of contraction 2. Active movement, with gravity eliminated 3. Active movement against gravity 4. Active movement against gravity and resistance 5. Normal power

  at hour 0, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours after procedure

Secondary Outcomes (4)

• • The degree of hip flexion on the operative side

  at 6 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours.

• • Static and dynamic pain scores.

  at 6 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours.

• postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) scale

  at 48 hours.

• • The number of rescue analgesia

  24 hours

Study Arms (2)

1. Group (A)

EXPERIMENTAL

will receive PENG + LFCN block

2. group (B)

EXPERIMENTAL

will receive S-FICB

Interventions

PENG + LFCN block versus S-FICB PROCEDURE

1\. Group (A) will receive PENG + LFCN block:

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• All hip trauma patients ≥ 18 years' old
• ASA class I, II, and III
• Solitary hip fracture

You may not qualify if:

• Neurological disturbance either baseline or traumatic brain injury
• Contraindications for regional anesthesia as bleeding disorders, infection at site of injection, or hypersensitivity to the used local anesthetics.
• Patient refusal.
• Massive poly trauma.
• Uncooperative patient

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Assiut University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Assiut university, faculty of medicine

Asyut, Asyut Governorate, 71515, Egypt

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative Complications; Pathologic Processes; Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms; Pain; Neurologic Manifestations; Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: SINGLE
• Who Masked: PARTICIPANT
• Masking Details: Through website computer program randomization program to distribute cases into two groups using their order number
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: principal investigator

Model Details: 96 Patients will be enrolled. Choice of type of anesthesia will be established according to every individual patient, but spinal anesthesia will be preferred over general anesthesia. The block will be administered under supervision of the supervisor senior staff before induction of anesthesia. 2 groups well be assessed 1. Group (A) will receive PENG + LFCN block 2. The second group (B): S-FICB

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: February 21, 2024
• First Posted: March 20, 2024
• Study Start: May 1, 2024
• Primary Completion: November 1, 2025
• Study Completion: December 1, 2025
• Last Updated: December 24, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will share
• Shared Documents: STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR

Locations

EG (1)