Clinical Success of Stainless Steel Crowns Applied Using Different Cements
Evaluation of the Clinical Success of Stainless Steel Crowns Applied Using Different Cements on Permanent Teeth Affected by Molar Incisor Hypomineralization
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main question of the study was to evaluate the one-year clinical success of SSc bonded with two different cement types in MIH teeth with excessive material loss. The researchears will compare the survival rate, effect on gingival health and radiographic success of calcium silicate-based resin-containing cement and resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 13, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 19, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2025
CompletedJanuary 30, 2025
January 1, 2025
7 months
March 13, 2024
January 28, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Anatomical Integrity
0: The crown retains its anatomical integrity. 1. The anatomical integrity of the restoration is impaired but functional. 2. The restoration is fractured, displaced or completely lost.
3. month, 6. month, 9. month, 12. month
Marginal Compliance
0: Clinically ideal. No opening is observed between crown and gingiva, no sonde enters. 1. Clinically acceptable. There is an opening between the crown and gingiva that does not extend to the prepared tooth. 2. Clinically unacceptable, tooth mobility and an opening extending to the prepared tooth.
3. month, 6. month, 9. month, 12. month
Proximal Contact
0: Clinically ideal. It is possible to clean the proximal contact area with dental floss. 1. Clinically acceptable. Floss passes hard or loose through the proximal contact area. 2. Clinically unacceptable, proximal contact is not present.
3. month, 6. month, 9. month, 12. month
Crown Marginal Location
1. Subgingival 2. Gingival level 3.Supragingival
3. month, 6. month, 9. month, 12. month
Restoration success
1. Crown appearance normal, no cracks, fractures, chips 2. Inconspicuously small loss of material 3. Huge loss of material
3. month, 6. month, 9. month, 12. month
Green and Vermillion's Oral Hygiene Index
0 No plaque and discoloration 1. Plaque accumulation of less than 1/3 of the tooth surface or extrinsic staining without plaque accumulation and regardless of the surface covered 2. Plaque accumulation more than 1/3 and less than 2/3 of the tooth surface 3. Plaque accumulation covering more than 2/3 of the tooth surface
3. month, 6. month, 9. month, 12. month
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Marginal Fit of the Crown (RADIOLOGICAL)
6. month, 12. month
Study Arms (2)
Arm 1
EXPERIMENTALCalcium silicate based resin cement
Arm 2
EXPERIMENTALResin modified glass ionomer cement
Interventions
Investigators will restore MIH teeth with stainless steel crowns using calcium silicate-based resin cement and resin-modified glass ionomer cement and evaluate their 1-year success.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Not having any systemic disease
- No history of allergy to any medication or restorative material (local anesthesia, nickel, etc.)
- No bad habits (mouth breathing, finger sucking, etc.)
- Score 3 or score 4 on the Frankl behavior scale
- Children between the ages of 9 and 12
- Agree to come to the controls regularly during the working period
You may not qualify if:
- Score 1 or 2 on the Frankl behavior scale
- Molar incisor hypomineralization has not been diagnosed
- Indication for unilateral crown
- Indication for extraction
- Gingival pocket depth exceeding 3 mm
- Presence of tooth mobility, abscess, fistula
- The opposite tooth of the affected tooth is absent or not in occlusion
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University
Afyonkarahisar, 03030, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Burcu GUCYETMEZ TOPAL, Asc. Prof.
Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University
- STUDY CHAIR
Esma ATIS, Res. Ass.
Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Asc. Prof.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 13, 2024
First Posted
March 19, 2024
Study Start
August 1, 2024
Primary Completion
March 1, 2025
Study Completion
April 1, 2025
Last Updated
January 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share