NCT06315439

Brief Summary

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided (EUS) tissue acquisition is the current standard of care for the diagnosis of pancreatic solid lesions but it is burdened by a non-negligible risk of non-diagnostic or inconclusive results. Ex-vivo fluorescence confocal laser microscopy (FCM) with MAVIG VivaScope® 2500M-G4 could allow real time assessment of adequacy and diagnosis of the sample.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
78

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2023

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2023

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 30, 2023

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 8, 2024

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 18, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

March 18, 2024

Status Verified

March 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

March 8, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 14, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Diagnostic accuracy

    To evaluate the accuracy of fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) for ex-vivo examination of samples obtained from EUS- FNA/B in pancreatic solid lesions to assess final diagnosis against final histological diagnosis.

    baseline

Study Arms (1)

pancreatic solid lesions

Procedure: Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle biopsy

Interventions

EUS FNA/B for solid pancreatic lesions. After the FNA/FNB, the needle was removed from the EUS endoscope and the specimen obtained after the first needle pass was expelled and placed directly in a dedicated scaffold (Cytomatrix, UCS Diagnostics). a drop of ethanol was put on it and the liquid was drained away thanks to the porous structure of the matrix. This step was followed by the deposition of a drop of acridine-orange for 20" and a rapid washing with buffered saline. After that, the Cytomatrix was put on a dedicated microscopic slide and covered with a second slide before the introduction in the slot of the machine. The FCM VivaScope® 2500 (2500M-G4; VivaScope, Munich, Germany) was used for immediate imaging.

pancreatic solid lesions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients with solid pancreatic lesion will be enrolled

You may qualify if:

  • pancreatic solid lesions

You may not qualify if:

  • cystic lesions
  • not suitable acoustic window for needle biopsy
  • decline to give informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio Medico

Rome, ROMA, 00191, Italy

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Itoi T, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Irisawa A, Khor CJ, Rerknimitr R. Current status of diagnostic endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of pancreatic mass lesions. Dig Endosc. 2011 May;23 Suppl 1:17-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2011.01132.x.

    PMID: 21535194BACKGROUND
  • Polkowski M, Jenssen C, Kaye P, Carrara S, Deprez P, Gines A, Fernandez-Esparrach G, Eisendrath P, Aithal GP, Arcidiacono P, Barthet M, Bastos P, Fornelli A, Napoleon B, Iglesias-Garcia J, Seicean A, Larghi A, Hassan C, van Hooft JE, Dumonceau JM. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017. Endoscopy. 2017 Oct;49(10):989-1006. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-119219. Epub 2017 Sep 12.

    PMID: 28898917BACKGROUND
  • Facciorusso A, Wani S, Triantafyllou K, Tziatzios G, Cannizzaro R, Muscatiello N, Singh S. Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Dec;90(6):893-903.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Jul 13.

    PMID: 31310744BACKGROUND
  • Gkolfakis P, Crino SF, Tziatzios G, Ramai D, Papaefthymiou A, Papanikolaou IS, Triantafyllou K, Arvanitakis M, Lisotti A, Fusaroli P, Mangiavillano B, Carrara S, Repici A, Hassan C, Facciorusso A. Comparative diagnostic performance of end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Jun;95(6):1067-1077.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.01.019. Epub 2022 Feb 4.

    PMID: 35124072BACKGROUND
  • Stigliano S, Crescenzi A, Taffon C, Covotta F, Hassan C, Antonelli G, Verri M, Biasutto D, Scarpa RM, Di Matteo FM. Role of fluorescence confocal microscopy for rapid evaluation of EUS fine-needle biopsy sampling in pancreatic solid lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Sep;94(3):562-568.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.03.029. Epub 2021 Mar 31.

    PMID: 33798539BACKGROUND

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
1 Day
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head of Operative Digestive Endoscopy department

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 8, 2024

First Posted

March 18, 2024

Study Start

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion

November 30, 2023

Study Completion

November 30, 2023

Last Updated

March 18, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations