Digital Confocal Microscopy for Real-time Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Lesion
Multi-RELAMI
1 other identifier
observational
78
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided (EUS) tissue acquisition is the current standard of care for the diagnosis of pancreatic solid lesions but it is burdened by a non-negligible risk of non-diagnostic or inconclusive results. Ex-vivo fluorescence confocal laser microscopy (FCM) with MAVIG VivaScope® 2500M-G4 could allow real time assessment of adequacy and diagnosis of the sample.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2023
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 8, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 18, 2024
CompletedMarch 18, 2024
March 1, 2024
11 months
March 8, 2024
March 14, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic accuracy
To evaluate the accuracy of fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) for ex-vivo examination of samples obtained from EUS- FNA/B in pancreatic solid lesions to assess final diagnosis against final histological diagnosis.
baseline
Study Arms (1)
pancreatic solid lesions
Interventions
EUS FNA/B for solid pancreatic lesions. After the FNA/FNB, the needle was removed from the EUS endoscope and the specimen obtained after the first needle pass was expelled and placed directly in a dedicated scaffold (Cytomatrix, UCS Diagnostics). a drop of ethanol was put on it and the liquid was drained away thanks to the porous structure of the matrix. This step was followed by the deposition of a drop of acridine-orange for 20" and a rapid washing with buffered saline. After that, the Cytomatrix was put on a dedicated microscopic slide and covered with a second slide before the introduction in the slot of the machine. The FCM VivaScope® 2500 (2500M-G4; VivaScope, Munich, Germany) was used for immediate imaging.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with solid pancreatic lesion will be enrolled
You may qualify if:
- pancreatic solid lesions
You may not qualify if:
- cystic lesions
- not suitable acoustic window for needle biopsy
- decline to give informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio Medico
Rome, ROMA, 00191, Italy
Related Publications (5)
Itoi T, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Irisawa A, Khor CJ, Rerknimitr R. Current status of diagnostic endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of pancreatic mass lesions. Dig Endosc. 2011 May;23 Suppl 1:17-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2011.01132.x.
PMID: 21535194BACKGROUNDPolkowski M, Jenssen C, Kaye P, Carrara S, Deprez P, Gines A, Fernandez-Esparrach G, Eisendrath P, Aithal GP, Arcidiacono P, Barthet M, Bastos P, Fornelli A, Napoleon B, Iglesias-Garcia J, Seicean A, Larghi A, Hassan C, van Hooft JE, Dumonceau JM. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017. Endoscopy. 2017 Oct;49(10):989-1006. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-119219. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
PMID: 28898917BACKGROUNDFacciorusso A, Wani S, Triantafyllou K, Tziatzios G, Cannizzaro R, Muscatiello N, Singh S. Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Dec;90(6):893-903.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
PMID: 31310744BACKGROUNDGkolfakis P, Crino SF, Tziatzios G, Ramai D, Papaefthymiou A, Papanikolaou IS, Triantafyllou K, Arvanitakis M, Lisotti A, Fusaroli P, Mangiavillano B, Carrara S, Repici A, Hassan C, Facciorusso A. Comparative diagnostic performance of end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Jun;95(6):1067-1077.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.01.019. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
PMID: 35124072BACKGROUNDStigliano S, Crescenzi A, Taffon C, Covotta F, Hassan C, Antonelli G, Verri M, Biasutto D, Scarpa RM, Di Matteo FM. Role of fluorescence confocal microscopy for rapid evaluation of EUS fine-needle biopsy sampling in pancreatic solid lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Sep;94(3):562-568.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.03.029. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
PMID: 33798539BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 1 Day
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of Operative Digestive Endoscopy department
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 8, 2024
First Posted
March 18, 2024
Study Start
January 1, 2023
Primary Completion
November 30, 2023
Study Completion
November 30, 2023
Last Updated
March 18, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share