Is Inpatient Rehabilitation Effective for Very Old Patients?
Clinical Effects of Inpatient Rehabilitation in Very Old Patients With Neurological, Musculoskeletal or Geriatric Disorders
1 other identifier
observational
2,270
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this retrospective longitudinal observational study is to compare the effects of physical and mental performance as well as quality of life in patients with neurological and musculoskeletal disorders. The main question it aims to answer is: Do very old patients benefit in a similar way from inpatient rehabilitation like younger patients? Data from about 2000 patients will be retrospectively analyzed. Functional Independence Measurement (FIM), Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) were recorded on admission and discharge. Researchers will compare the age group 75 to 84 and 85 to 99 to see if physical and mental performance as well as quality of life will improve.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2020
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 4, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 12, 2024
CompletedMarch 12, 2024
March 1, 2024
3 years
March 4, 2024
March 8, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
FIM
Functional Independence Measurement; 18 categories, focusing on motor and cognitive function; each category or item is rated on a 7-point scale (1 = \<25% independence; total assistance required, 7 = 100% independence); interval scale
2 years
TUG
Timed Up and Go Test; used to assess a person's mobility; It uses the time (in seconds) that a person takes to rise from a chair, walk three meters, turn around 180 degrees, walk back to the chair, and sit down while turning 180 degrees; the faster the better; interval scale
2 years
EQ-5D (Quality of life)
EQ-5D is a standardised measure of health-related quality of life developed by the EuroQol; EQ-5D assesses health status in terms of five dimensions of health (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression); EQ-5D is not an abbreviation and is the correct term to use when referring to the instrument; the higher the better; minimum 0, maximum 100; interval scale
2 years
PROMIS
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System; assessing physical, mental, and social well-being from the patient perspective; we assessed physical health (5 items, 0-10) and mental health (2 items, 0-10); interval scale
2 years
Study Arms (2)
age group 75-84
Inpatient rehabilitation included physiotherapy (30-60 min, 5 times/week), strength and endurance training (30-45 min, 3-5 times/week), occupational therapy (30 min, 2-3 times/week), and neuropsychological training (30 min, 2 times/week).
age group 85-99
Inpatient rehabilitation included physiotherapy (30-60 min, 5 times/week), strength and endurance training (30-45 min, 3-5 times/week), occupational therapy (30 min, 2-3 times/week), and neuropsychological training (30 min, 2 times/week).
Interventions
physiotherapy (strength and endurance training), occupational therapy and neuropsychological training
Eligibility Criteria
Eligible subjects were German-speaking and over 74 years old referred to the Rehabilitation Centre Valens in Switzerland for inpatient rehabilitation.
You may qualify if:
- german speaking
- age \>74
- patients with neurological and musculoskeletal disorders
You may not qualify if:
- age \<75
- patients with pulmonological and internal disorders
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Klinik Valenslead
Study Sites (1)
Klinik Valens
Valens, Canton of St. Gallen, CH-7317, Switzerland
Related Publications (4)
Maritz R, Tennant A, Fellinghauer C, Stucki G, Prodinger B. The Functional Independence Measure 18-item version can be reported as a unidimensional interval-scaled metric: Internal construct validity revisited. J Rehabil Med. 2019 Mar 13;51(3):193-200. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2525.
PMID: 30843597RESULTDevlin NJ, Brooks R. EQ-5D and the EuroQol Group: Past, Present and Future. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Apr;15(2):127-137. doi: 10.1007/s40258-017-0310-5.
PMID: 28194657RESULTFries JF, Witter J, Rose M, Cella D, Khanna D, Morgan-DeWitt E. Item response theory, computerized adaptive testing, and PROMIS: assessment of physical function. J Rheumatol. 2014 Jan;41(1):153-8. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130813. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
PMID: 24241485RESULTValet M, Lejeune T, Devis M, van Pesch V, El Sankari S, Stoquart G. Timed Up-and-Go and 2-Minute Walk Test in patients with multiple sclerosis with mild disability: reliability, responsiveness and link with perceived fatigue. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 Aug;55(4):450-455. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.18.05366-2. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
PMID: 30311490RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Roman Gonzenbach, Dr.
Kliniken Valens
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 4, 2024
First Posted
March 12, 2024
Study Start
January 1, 2020
Primary Completion
December 31, 2022
Study Completion
January 1, 2023
Last Updated
March 12, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03