Intravenous Methylene Blue for Treating Refractory Neonatal Septic Shock
1 other identifier
interventional
130
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Preterm infants (born at less than 37 weeks of pregnancy) sometimes develop a serious blood infection leading to low blood pressure, which does not respond to saline or to the standard medicines for increasing blood pressure, such as dopamine and epinephrine. The goal of this research study is to compare the effect of giving an injectable medicine called Methylene blue (MB) versus not giving MB to such preterm infants who are unresponsive to standard treatment. The main questions that this study aims to answer is:
- 1.Whether MB treatment reduces death to any cause as compared to no MB treatment.
- 2.Whether treatment with MB reduces the time to achieve normal blood pressure
- 3.Whether treatment with MB reduces the time to stoppage of all blood pressure medications, steroids and normal saline.
- 4.Whether treatment with MB improves heart function as measured by echocardiography at 24 and 48 hours.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Mar 2024
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 20, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 12, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 15, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 14, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2027
ExpectedMarch 12, 2024
March 1, 2024
2 years
February 20, 2024
March 5, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
All-cause mortality within 7 days after randomization
Mortality due to any cause over 7 days after randomization
7 days
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Time taken to achieve therapeutic end-points within 7 days after randomization
7 days
Time taken to stop all inotrope/vasopressor treatment within 7 days after randomisation
7 days
Echocardiographic fractional shortening at 24 hour after randomization
24 hour
Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) by echocardiography at 24 hour after randomization
24 hour
Left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) by echocardiography at 24 hour after randomization
24 hour
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Methylene blue
EXPERIMENTALSubjects in the intervention arm will receive a 1 mg/kg bolus of methylene blue over 30 minutes, followed by an infusion of 0.15 mg/kg/h. The infusion rate may be increased in steps of 0.15 mg/kg/h every 30 minutes until a maximum of 0.5 mg/kg/h.
Placebo infusion
PLACEBO COMPARATORSubjects in the control arm will receive a placebo infusion (normal saline) at the same volumetric rate.
Interventions
Subjects in the intervention arm will receive a 1 mg/kg bolus of methylene blue over 30 minutes, followed by an infusion of 0.15 mg/kg/h. The infusion rate may be increased in steps of 0.15 mg/kg/h every 30 minutes until a maximum of 0.5 mg/kg/h.
Subjects in the placebo arm will receive normal saline in the same volumetric dose as methylene blue in the intervention arm
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Definite/probable sepsis :Clinical syndrome of sepsis for which bedside neonatologist starts intravenous antibiotics AND either a positive culture of otherwise sterile body fluid OR presence of any 2 or more of the following five markers of sepsis: (a) C-reactive protein \>10 mg/dL; (b) procalcitonin as per age-appropriate cut-off (c) total leukocyte count and absolute neutrophilic count beyond acceptable range (d) chest X-ray adjudged as pneumonia by two independent Neonatologists.
- Shock: adapted from the definition given by Davis et al 2017
- Either SBP \< age and gestation appropriate cut-off OR
- Presence of any 2 of the following 6 parameters i. HR \>205/min ii. Central pulses either week OR bounding iii. CRT \>3 sec OR flash refill (\<1 sec) iv. skin mottled/cool OR flushed v. urine output \<0.5 ml/kg/h in the preceding 6 hours vi. DBP \< age and gestation appropriate cut-off
- Fluid and catecholamine-resistant shock: received fluid boluses up to a maximum of 40 ml/kg followed by catecholamine infusion titrated up to the maximum dose. The catecholamine infusion could be either dopamine (maximum dose 20 µg/kg/min) or epinephrine (maximum dose 0.4 µg/kg/min) or norepinephrine (maximum dose 0.4 µg/kg/min).
You may not qualify if:
- excluded if ≥1 criterion positive:
- G6PD deficient or family history of G6PD deficiency
- Potentially lethal malformation
- Congenital heart disease
- Severe acute kidney injury
- Family history of allergy to methylene blue or food dyes
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER)
Chandigarh, 160012, India
Related Publications (24)
Hotchkiss RS, Karl IE. The pathophysiology and treatment of sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jan 9;348(2):138-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra021333. No abstract available.
PMID: 12519925RESULTStolk RF, Kox M, Pickkers P. Noradrenaline drives immunosuppression in sepsis: clinical consequences. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Jun;46(6):1246-1248. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06025-2. Epub 2020 Apr 8. No abstract available.
PMID: 32270211RESULTStolk RF, van der Pasch E, Naumann F, Schouwstra J, Bressers S, van Herwaarden AE, Gerretsen J, Schambergen R, Ruth MM, van der Hoeven JG, van Leeuwen H, Pickkers P, Kox M. Norepinephrine Dysregulates the Immune Response and Compromises Host Defense during Sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Sep 15;202(6):830-842. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202002-0339OC.
PMID: 32520577RESULTLevin RL, Degrange MA, Bruno GF, Del Mazo CD, Taborda DJ, Griotti JJ, Boullon FJ. Methylene blue reduces mortality and morbidity in vasoplegic patients after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Feb;77(2):496-9. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01510-8.
PMID: 14759425RESULTIsmail R, Awad H, Allam R, Youssef O, Ibrahim M, Shehata B. Methylene blue versus vasopressin analog for refractory septic shock in the preterm neonate: A randomized controlled trial. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2022;15(2):265-273. doi: 10.3233/NPM-210824.
PMID: 34719443RESULTOtero Luna AV, Johnson R, Funaro M, Canarie MF, Pierce RW. Methylene Blue for Refractory Shock in Children: A Systematic Review and Survey Practice Analysis. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Jun;21(6):e378-e386. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002295.
PMID: 32453920RESULTLuis-Silva F, Menegueti MG, Sato L, Peres LM, Dos Reis Sepeda C, Petroski-Moraes BC, Donadel MD, Gallo GB, Jordani MC, Mestriner F, Becari C, Basile-Filho A, Evora PRB, Martins-Filho OA, Auxiliadora-Martins M. Effect of methylene blue on hemodynamic response in the early phase of septic shock: A case series. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jan 27;102(4):e32743. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032743.
PMID: 36705345RESULTIbarra-Estrada M, Kattan E, Aguilera-Gonzalez P, Sandoval-Plascencia L, Rico-Jauregui U, Gomez-Partida CA, Ortiz-Macias IX, Lopez-Pulgarin JA, Chavez-Pena Q, Mijangos-Mendez JC, Aguirre-Avalos G, Hernandez G. Early adjunctive methylene blue in patients with septic shock: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2023 Mar 13;27(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04397-7.
PMID: 36915146RESULTMemis D, Karamanlioglu B, Yuksel M, Gemlik I, Pamukcu Z. The influence of methylene blue infusion on cytokine levels during severe sepsis. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2002 Dec;30(6):755-62. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0203000606.
PMID: 12500513RESULTKirov MY, Evgenov OV, Evgenov NV, Egorina EM, Sovershaev MA, Sveinbjornsson B, Nedashkovsky EV, Bjertnaes LJ. Infusion of methylene blue in human septic shock: a pilot, randomized, controlled study. Crit Care Med. 2001 Oct;29(10):1860-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200110000-00002.
PMID: 11588440RESULTZhang X, Gao Y, Pan P, Wang Y, Li W, Yu X. [Methylene blue in the treatment of vasodilatory shock: a Meta-analysis]. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017 Nov;29(11):982-987. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.11.005. Chinese.
PMID: 29151412RESULTDumbarton TC, Minor S, Yeung CK, Green R. Prolonged methylene blue infusion in refractory septic shock: a case report. Can J Anaesth. 2011 Apr;58(4):401-5. doi: 10.1007/s12630-011-9458-x. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
PMID: 21246318RESULTZhao CC, Zhai YJ, Hu ZJ, Huo Y, Li ZQ, Zhu GJ. Efficacy and safety of methylene blue in patients with vasodilatory shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 26;9:950596. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.950596. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 36237547RESULTFleischmann-Struzek C, Goldfarb DM, Schlattmann P, Schlapbach LJ, Reinhart K, Kissoon N. The global burden of paediatric and neonatal sepsis: a systematic review. Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Mar;6(3):223-230. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30063-8.
PMID: 29508706RESULTBentzer P, Griesdale DE, Boyd J, MacLean K, Sirounis D, Ayas NT. Will This Hemodynamically Unstable Patient Respond to a Bolus of Intravenous Fluids? JAMA. 2016 Sep 27;316(12):1298-309. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.12310.
PMID: 27673307RESULTAya HD, Ster IC, Fletcher N, Grounds RM, Rhodes A, Cecconi M. Pharmacodynamic Analysis of a Fluid Challenge. Crit Care Med. 2016 May;44(5):880-91. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001517.
PMID: 26683506RESULTNandhabalan P, Ioannou N, Meadows C, Wyncoll D. Refractory septic shock: our pragmatic approach. Crit Care. 2018 Sep 19;22(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2144-4.
PMID: 30231909RESULTPark BK, Shim TS, Lim CM, Lee SD, Kim WS, Kim DS, Kim WD, Koh Y. The effects of methylene blue on hemodynamic parameters and cytokine levels in refractory septic shock. Korean J Intern Med. 2005 Jun;20(2):123-8. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2005.20.2.123.
PMID: 16134766RESULTEvora PR, Roselino CH, Schiaveto PM. Methylene blue in anaphylactic shock. Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Aug;30(2):240. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70152-5. No abstract available.
PMID: 9250657RESULTKudawla M, Dutta S, Narang A. Validation of a clinical score for the diagnosis of late onset neonatal septicemia in babies weighing 1000-2500 g. J Trop Pediatr. 2008 Feb;54(1):66-9. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmm065. Epub 2007 Aug 14.
PMID: 17698886RESULTDavis AL, Carcillo JA, Aneja RK, Deymann AJ, Lin JC, Nguyen TC, Okhuysen-Cawley RS, Relvas MS, Rozenfeld RA, Skippen PW, Stojadinovic BJ, Williams EA, Yeh TS, Balamuth F, Brierley J, de Caen AR, Cheifetz IM, Choong K, Conway E Jr, Cornell T, Doctor A, Dugas MA, Feldman JD, Fitzgerald JC, Flori HR, Fortenberry JD, Graciano AL, Greenwald BM, Hall MW, Han YY, Hernan LJ, Irazuzta JE, Iselin E, van der Jagt EW, Jeffries HE, Kache S, Katyal C, Kissoon N, Kon AA, Kutko MC, MacLaren G, Maul T, Mehta R, Odetola F, Parbuoni K, Paul R, Peters MJ, Ranjit S, Reuter-Rice KE, Schnitzler EJ, Scott HF, Torres A Jr, Weingarten-Abrams J, Weiss SL, Zimmerman JJ, Zuckerberg AL. The American College of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Parameters for Hemodynamic Support of Pediatric and Neonatal Septic Shock: Executive Summary. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Sep;18(9):884-890. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001259. No abstract available.
PMID: 28723883RESULTZubrow AB, Hulman S, Kushner H, Falkner B. Determinants of blood pressure in infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units: a prospective multicenter study. Philadelphia Neonatal Blood Pressure Study Group. J Perinatol. 1995 Nov-Dec;15(6):470-9.
PMID: 8648456RESULTKermorvant-Duchemin E, Laborie S, Rabilloud M, Lapillonne A, Claris O. Outcome and prognostic factors in neonates with septic shock. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008 Mar;9(2):186-91. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31816689a8.
PMID: 18477932RESULTBaske K, Saini SS, Dutta S, Sundaram V. Epinephrine versus dopamine in neonatal septic shock: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Sep;177(9):1335-1342. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3195-x. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
PMID: 29936590RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sourabh Dutta, MD, PhD
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The random allocation will be concealed using serially numbered opaque sealed envelopes. After opening the envelope, a research nurse will administer a bolus of the study drug or placebo behind a screen, shielded from other staff. The infusion will be drawn up in an opaque syringe by the research nurse and infused through an intravenous tubing covered completely with aluminum foil. The research nurses will not be masked to the study drug. The parents of the subject, the regular staff nurses and doctors working in the unit and the project coordinator will be masked.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 20, 2024
First Posted
March 12, 2024
Study Start
March 15, 2024
Primary Completion
March 14, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2027
Last Updated
March 12, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Data will be made available one year after the publication from the study for a period of 3 years
- Access Criteria
- To be decided
Anonymized, individual patient data pertaining to publications from the study which are in the public domain will be shared with other researchers planning to conduct a study, upon reasonable written request