Comparison Between Drinking Water and Normal Saline in Irrigating Traumatic Wound
1 other identifier
interventional
440
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
There is a controversy regarding the roles of the Normal saline and Tap water in irrigation of the wound. It has been suggested that antiseptic solution including normal saline has cytotoxic effect while tap water damages the fibroblast. There are no high level evidence to support one type of solution over other, systematic review have found no difference in wound infection between irrigation with normal saline vs tap water. There are ten randomized controlled trial comparing tap water with normal saline for irrigating wound published between 1992 to 2016. These RCT are analyzed in three systemic review and meta-analysis published on 2016, 2019, 2022, which showed that tap water and normal saline has no difference in terms of infection rate. The infection rate observed in various studies ranges from 0-11.5% in normal saline group and 0-12.6% in tap water group with no statistically significant difference.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 20, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 12, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2027
March 12, 2024
March 1, 2024
2.5 years
February 20, 2024
March 4, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison between drinking water and normal saline in irrigating traumatic wound: Noninferiority trial.
Difference in wound infection rates between the two randomized groups. Wound evaluation was based on the following criteria No infection: 1. No discharge or fever on day 3 2. Dry and no fever on day 7 Infection 1\. Fever greater than 1000 F or pus discharge on any day 2. Erythema with serous discharge on any day
3-7 Days
Study Arms (2)
Irrigating Traumatic Wound with Drinking Water
EXPERIMENTALIn drinking water arm, acute traumatic wound will be cleaned with drinking water. Bacteriological safety of the drinking water will be ensured by testing water.
Irrigating Traumatic Wound with Normal Saline
EXPERIMENTALIn normal saline arm, acute traumatic wound will be cleaned with normal saline.
Interventions
Irrigating Traumatic Wound with Drinking Water and Normal Saline
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Laceration wound presenting within 6 hours of duration
- Lacerations involving upper and lower limbs, scalps, head and neck
You may not qualify if:
- Lacerations involving, lips, ears, mucosal surface, perineal and peri anal region
- Punctured or penetrating wound
- Bite wounds by human or animals or snakes
- Dirty wound requiring surgical debridement
- Patient requiring irrigation of wound with more than 1 liter of fluid
- Wounds involving tendon, joint or bone
- Wound associated with open fracture
- Patient on corticosteroid, antibiotics or immunosuppressant
- Patient who are not able to come for follow-up
- Immunocompromised patient
- Patient with history of significant peripheral vascular disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Links
- The Effects of Wound Lavage Solutions on Canine Fibroblasts: An In Vitro Study
- Is tap water a safe alternative to normal saline for wound irrigation in the community setting?
- Water is a safe and effective alternative to sterile normal saline for wound irrigation prior to suturing: a prospective, double-blind, randomised, controlled clinical trial
- The effectiveness of cleansing solution for wound treatment A systematic review
- Comparison of wounds' infection rate between tap water and normal saline cleansing: A meta-analysis of randomised control trials
- Water for wound cleansing
- A Multicenter Comparison of Tap Water versus Sterile Saline for Wound Irrigation
- Injury, fatal and nonfatal: Sharp and cutting-edge wounds
- Wound classification
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ashis Shrestha, Fellow
Patan Academy of Health Sciences
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 20, 2024
First Posted
March 12, 2024
Study Start
March 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
March 12, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03