Effect of Oral Enteral Nutrition on Cerebral Small Vessel Disease
Oral Versus Nasal Enteral Nutrition on Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: A Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Nasogastric tube feeding (NGT) has been widely used in cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) patients with dysphagia but has a significant risk of complications. Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding (IOE) is an established enteral nutrition approach that can be used with comprehensive rehabilitation therapy. This study aims to explore the clinical effect of IOE vs. NGT on CSVD Patients with Dysphagia. Compared to NGT, IOE, as an enteral nutrition support mode, in CSVD Patients with Dysphagia who received comprehensive rehabilitation therapy, showed advantages in improvement in dysphagia, nutritional status, ADL, QOL, pneumonia, and adverse events, which should be considered as the preferred approach.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 2, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 15, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 5, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 12, 2024
CompletedMarch 12, 2024
March 1, 2024
5 months
March 5, 2024
March 9, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Functional Oral Intake Scale
During Dysphagia-Functional Oral Intake Scale assessment, evaluators engage in communication with the patient, conduct observations, and make records to assess the patient's oral intake ability. The FOIS assessment form includes seven levels of scoring, ranging from level 1 to level 7, indicating a progressive improvement in the patient's oral intake ability. In general, the result below level 6 indicates unsafe for oral intake while level 6 and above indicates that eating via mouth can be safely conducted.
day 1 and day 15
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Body mass index
day 1 and day 15
Serum albumin
day 1 and day 15
Hemoglobin
day 1 and day 15
Pneumonia
day 1 and day 15
Activities of daily living
day 1 and day 15
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Nasogastric tube
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe group was given enteral nutritional support with Nasogastric tube according to the relevant guidelines. Within 4 hours after admission, the placement of the feeding tube was conducted by professional medical staffs and after intubation, the tube was secured. The feeding was conducted once every 3-4 hours, with 200-300ml each time. The total feeding volume was determined based on daily requirements.
Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube
EXPERIMENTALThe group was given enteral nutritional support with Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube according to the following procedure. The feeding content was formulated by the nutritionists to reach the energy demand as 20-25 kcal/kg/day and protein supplementation of 1.2-2.0 g/kg/day for both two groups
Interventions
The group was given enteral nutritional support with IOE according to the following procedure: Before each feeding, inside and outside of the tube was cleaned with water. During feeding, the patient should maintain a semi-reclining or sitting position with mouth opened, and the tube was inserted slowly and smoothly into the upper part of the esophagus by medical staffs while the appropriate depth of intubation was checked with the calibration markings on the tube wall. The distance from the incisors to the head part of the tube should be between 22-25 cm. However, the specific depth should be evaluated based on patients' feedback and adjusted accordingly. After insertion, the tail part of the tube should be put into a container full of water and the absence of continuous bubbles indicated a successful intubation. Then, the feeding was to be conducted three times per day with 50 ml per minute and 400-600ml for each feeding.
Within 4 hours after admission, the placement of the feeding tube was conducted by professional medical staffs and after intubation, the tube was secured to the patient\'s cheek with medical tape. The feeding was conducted once every 3-4 hours, with 200-300ml each time. The total feeding volume was determined based on daily requirements. The feeding content was formulated by the nutritionists based on the condition and relevant guidelines to reach the energy demand as 20-25 kcal/kg/day and protein supplementation of 1.2-2.0 g/kg/day for both two groups. For patients with limited tube feeding compliance, we made appropriate adjustments to ensure that they were not at risk of severe malnutrition as much as possible.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of Cerebral Small Vessel Disease;
- Must be able to cooperate with treatment and questionnaire investigation;
- Clinical diagnosis of dysphagia through the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) and Video Fluoroscopic Swallowing Study (VFSS);
- Age between 40 and 70 years;
- Enteral nutrition support was required and feasible.
- No history of prior stroke.
You may not qualify if:
- Dysphagia related to other cerebrovascular diseases or caused by neurodegenerative diseases;
- Complicated with severe liver and kidney failure, tumors, or hematological disorders;
- Simultaneously need to undergo other therapy that might affect the outcomes of this study;
- Pregnant or nursing females.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Muhammadlead
Study Sites (1)
Huimin Hos.
Pengfu, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Nieto Luis, Master
Site Coordinator of United Medical Group
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 5, 2024
First Posted
March 12, 2024
Study Start
January 1, 2023
Primary Completion
June 2, 2023
Study Completion
June 15, 2023
Last Updated
March 12, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share