NCT06303999

Brief Summary

Nasogastric tube feeding (NGT) has been widely used in cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) patients with dysphagia but has a significant risk of complications. Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding (IOE) is an established enteral nutrition approach that can be used with comprehensive rehabilitation therapy. This study aims to explore the clinical effect of IOE vs. NGT on CSVD Patients with Dysphagia. Compared to NGT, IOE, as an enteral nutrition support mode, in CSVD Patients with Dysphagia who received comprehensive rehabilitation therapy, showed advantages in improvement in dysphagia, nutritional status, ADL, QOL, pneumonia, and adverse events, which should be considered as the preferred approach.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2023

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 2, 2023

Completed
13 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 15, 2023

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 5, 2024

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 12, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

March 12, 2024

Status Verified

March 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

March 5, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 9, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Functional Oral Intake Scale

    During Dysphagia-Functional Oral Intake Scale assessment, evaluators engage in communication with the patient, conduct observations, and make records to assess the patient's oral intake ability. The FOIS assessment form includes seven levels of scoring, ranging from level 1 to level 7, indicating a progressive improvement in the patient's oral intake ability. In general, the result below level 6 indicates unsafe for oral intake while level 6 and above indicates that eating via mouth can be safely conducted.

    day 1 and day 15

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Body mass index

    day 1 and day 15

  • Serum albumin

    day 1 and day 15

  • Hemoglobin

    day 1 and day 15

  • Pneumonia

    day 1 and day 15

  • Activities of daily living

    day 1 and day 15

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Nasogastric tube

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The group was given enteral nutritional support with Nasogastric tube according to the relevant guidelines. Within 4 hours after admission, the placement of the feeding tube was conducted by professional medical staffs and after intubation, the tube was secured. The feeding was conducted once every 3-4 hours, with 200-300ml each time. The total feeding volume was determined based on daily requirements.

Device: Nasogastric tube

Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube

EXPERIMENTAL

The group was given enteral nutritional support with Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube according to the following procedure. The feeding content was formulated by the nutritionists to reach the energy demand as 20-25 kcal/kg/day and protein supplementation of 1.2-2.0 g/kg/day for both two groups

Device: Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube

Interventions

The group was given enteral nutritional support with IOE according to the following procedure: Before each feeding, inside and outside of the tube was cleaned with water. During feeding, the patient should maintain a semi-reclining or sitting position with mouth opened, and the tube was inserted slowly and smoothly into the upper part of the esophagus by medical staffs while the appropriate depth of intubation was checked with the calibration markings on the tube wall. The distance from the incisors to the head part of the tube should be between 22-25 cm. However, the specific depth should be evaluated based on patients' feedback and adjusted accordingly. After insertion, the tail part of the tube should be put into a container full of water and the absence of continuous bubbles indicated a successful intubation. Then, the feeding was to be conducted three times per day with 50 ml per minute and 400-600ml for each feeding.

Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube

Within 4 hours after admission, the placement of the feeding tube was conducted by professional medical staffs and after intubation, the tube was secured to the patient\'s cheek with medical tape. The feeding was conducted once every 3-4 hours, with 200-300ml each time. The total feeding volume was determined based on daily requirements. The feeding content was formulated by the nutritionists based on the condition and relevant guidelines to reach the energy demand as 20-25 kcal/kg/day and protein supplementation of 1.2-2.0 g/kg/day for both two groups. For patients with limited tube feeding compliance, we made appropriate adjustments to ensure that they were not at risk of severe malnutrition as much as possible.

Nasogastric tube

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Clinical diagnosis of Cerebral Small Vessel Disease;
  • Must be able to cooperate with treatment and questionnaire investigation;
  • Clinical diagnosis of dysphagia through the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) and Video Fluoroscopic Swallowing Study (VFSS);
  • Age between 40 and 70 years;
  • Enteral nutrition support was required and feasible.
  • No history of prior stroke.

You may not qualify if:

  • Dysphagia related to other cerebrovascular diseases or caused by neurodegenerative diseases;
  • Complicated with severe liver and kidney failure, tumors, or hematological disorders;
  • Simultaneously need to undergo other therapy that might affect the outcomes of this study;
  • Pregnant or nursing females.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Huimin Hos.

Pengfu, Taiwan

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases

Interventions

Enteral Nutrition

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Feeding MethodsTherapeuticsNutritional SupportNutrition Therapy

Study Officials

  • Nieto Luis, Master

    Site Coordinator of United Medical Group

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Research Director

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 5, 2024

First Posted

March 12, 2024

Study Start

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion

June 2, 2023

Study Completion

June 15, 2023

Last Updated

March 12, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations