Telerehabilitation in Patients With Fibromyalgia
Clinical Outcomes of Asynchronous Telerehabilitation Are Equivalent to Synchronous Telerehabilitation in Patients With Fibromyalgia: a Randomized Control Study
1 other identifier
interventional
66
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Sixty-six FMS patients received the same exercise program for 8 weeks and divided, synchronous (n: 33), asynchronous (n: 33). Pain (Visual analog Scale, VAS), functional limitations and disabilities (Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire, FEA), health-related quality of life (HRQol; Short Form-12, SF 12), catastrophizing (pain catastrophizing scale, PCS), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HAD), functional capacity (6-minute walking test, 6MWT), muscle strength (Arm curl test) joint position sense (Laser Cursor Assisted Angle Repetition Test, LI-RATT) were assessed at baseline, mid-treatment (week 4), end of treatment (week 8), and eight weeks after treatment (week 16).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 27, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 27, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 8, 2024
CompletedMarch 13, 2024
March 1, 2024
6 months
March 1, 2024
March 11, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual Analog Scale
A visual analog scale was used to evaluate the patient's pain. This scale is used to quantify pain intensity that cannot be measured numerically. Numbers are written on the two ends of a 10 cm line. The patient is asked to indicate on this line where the pain condition is appropriate during rest by drawing a line, putting a dot or pointing. For pain intensity, according to the scale, "no pain" will be rated as 0 points and "worst pain imaginable" as 10 points. The ranges for pain intensity were determined as \<3 Mild pain, 3-6 moderate pain, 6 and above severe pain.
at baseline at mid-treatment (week 4), at the end of treatment (week 8), and eight weeks after treatment (week 16)
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
at baseline at mid-treatment (week 4), at the end of treatment (week 8), and eight weeks after treatment (week 16)
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
at baseline at mid-treatment (week 4), at the end of treatment (week 8), and eight weeks after treatment (week 16)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
at baseline at mid-treatment (week 4), at the end of treatment (week 8), and eight weeks after treatment (week 16)
6 Minute Walk Test
at baseline at mid-treatment (week 4), at the end of treatment (week 8), and eight weeks after treatment (week 16)
Arm Curl Test
at baseline at mid-treatment (week 4), at the end of treatment (week 8), and eight weeks after treatment (week 16)
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Synchronous Exercise Group
EXPERIMENTALSynchronous telerehabilitation was performed via videoconference. Patients were taken to video conference calls accompanied by a researcher and supervisor. Participants were to perform their exercises simultaneously under the guidance of the researcher. Participants were taken to video conference calls in groups of 5 with similar functional levels. Each session lasts an average of 45 minutes. It was last. The start and end date of the exercise program, the number of repetitions for each exercise, the number of sets, daily repetitions, rest time between sets and the order of the exercises were determined by the researcher.
Asynchronous Exercise Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORAsynchronous telerehabilitation was carried out through the mobile application. Researchers created a record for each participant in the mobile application with the personal information of the participants. Participants were logged in to the application with an account address and password created for them. The mobile application was supervised and followed by a researcher. The principal researcher prepared an exercise program specifically for each participant. He sent the exercise program he had prepared to the relevant participants through the application. In the mobile application, all exercises are explained in video and writing.
Interventions
Exercise Program In our study, the telerehabilitation program was applied for both synchronous and asynchronous groups, 3 days a week, 1 session per day, for 8 weeks. The exercises were combined individually according to the person's capacity, and the intensity and duration of the exercise will gradually increase according to the patient's tolerance.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed with FMS by the physician in accordance with ACR 2016 criteria,
- Having independent mobility,
- Not having advanced vision and hearing loss,
- Minimum literacy, participating voluntarily, making video calls, Internet and smartphone access
You may not qualify if:
- Have a rheumatic disease with more prominent symptoms than FMS,
- Have an active infection,
- Have a surgical operation in the last three months,
- Have an uncontrollable chronic disease,
- Have another musculoskeletal disorder
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Health Sciences
Istanbul, Maltepe, 1464185881, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (6)
BALKE B. A SIMPLE FIELD TEST FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF PHYSICAL FITNESS. REP 63-6. Rep Civ Aeromed Res Inst US. 1963 Apr:1-8. No abstract available.
PMID: 14131272BACKGROUNDSoylu C, Kütük B. "Reliability and validity study of the Turkish form of the SF-12 Quality of Life Scale." Turkish Journal of Psychiatry.2020; 1-9.
BACKGROUNDZigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
PMID: 6880820BACKGROUNDSullivan MJ, Bishop SR, Pivik J. The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychological assessment. 1995; 7(4): 524.
BACKGROUNDBennett RM, Friend R, Jones KD, Ward R, Han BK, Ross RL. The Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR): validation and psychometric properties. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(4):R120. doi: 10.1186/ar2783. Epub 2009 Aug 10.
PMID: 19664287BACKGROUNDTimurtas E, Huzmeli I, Demirbuken I, Polat MG. Clinical outcomes of asynchronous telerehabilitation through a mobile app are equivalent to synchronous telerehabilitation in patients with fibromyalgia: a randomized control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Feb 4;26(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08377-6.
PMID: 39905353DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assoc. Prof.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 1, 2024
First Posted
March 8, 2024
Study Start
May 27, 2023
Primary Completion
November 15, 2023
Study Completion
January 27, 2024
Last Updated
March 13, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03