The Utility of Mobile Based Application for Patient Reported Outcome Measures In Patients With Acetabular Fractures : A Randomized Clinical Trial

NCT06298578 | Not Yet Recruiting

• 1 other identifier: Mobile Based Application
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 126
• Locations: 0 countries
• Sites: N/A

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this study is to validate the feasibility of a remote patient monitoring (RPM) system using Mobile App in terms of the frequency of data interruptions and patient acceptance. The secondary objective is to Improve quality of life and early prediction of the complications.

Conditions

Acetabular Fracture

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• percentage of missed follow up data in both groups postoperatively through assessing the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) after surgery for a fracture of the acetabulum using the Arabic validated form of (SF-36)

  Comparison between follow up using mobile app versus in person clinic visit

  Baseline

Secondary Outcomes (1)

• Quality of life scoring (Arabic validated form of (SF-36) and early prediction of the complications

  Baseline

Study Arms (2)

In person follow up

mobile app follow up

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years+
• Sex: all
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients aged more than 18 years who will have a surgery for an acetabular fracture at assiut university hospital.

You may qualify if:

• All patients aged more than 18 years who will have a surgery for an acetabular fracture at assiut university hospital.

You may not qualify if:

• Patients younger than 18years old

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Assiut University: lead

Related Publications (14)

• JUDET R, JUDET J, LETOURNEL E. FRACTURES OF THE ACETABULUM: CLASSIFICATION AND SURGICAL APPROACHES FOR OPEN REDUCTION. PRELIMINARY REPORT. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1964 Dec;46:1615-46. No abstract available.

  PMID: 14239854 BACKGROUND

• Mears DC, Velyvis JH, Chang CP. Displaced acetabular fractures managed operatively: indicators of outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Feb;(407):173-86. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200302000-00026.

  PMID: 12567145 BACKGROUND

• Frietman B, Biert J, Edwards MJR. Patient-reported outcome measures after surgery for an acetabular fracture. Bone Joint J. 2018 May 1;100-B(5):640-645. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B5.BJJ-2017-0871.R3.

  PMID: 29701094 BACKGROUND

• Giannoudis PV, Grotz MR, Papakostidis C, Dinopoulos H. Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Jan;87(1):2-9.

  PMID: 15686228 BACKGROUND

• Tannast M, Najibi S, Matta JM. Two to twenty-year survivorship of the hip in 810 patients with operatively treated acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Sep 5;94(17):1559-67. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00444.

  PMID: 22992846 BACKGROUND

• Clarke-Jenssen J, Roise O, Storeggen SAO, Madsen JE. Long-term survival and risk factors for failure of the native hip joint after operatively treated displaced acetabular fractures. Bone Joint J. 2017 Jun;99-B(6):834-840. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.BJJ-2016-1013.R1.

  PMID: 28566406 BACKGROUND

• Dodd A, Osterhoff G, Guy P, Lefaivre KA. Assessment of functional outcomes of surgically managed acetabular fractures: a systematic review. Bone Joint J. 2016 May;98-B(5):690-5. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B5.36292.

  PMID: 27143743 BACKGROUND

• Ramkumar PN, Haeberle HS, Ramanathan D, Cantrell WA, Navarro SM, Mont MA, Bloomfield M, Patterson BM. Remote Patient Monitoring Using Mobile Health for Total Knee Arthroplasty: Validation of a Wearable and Machine Learning-Based Surveillance Platform. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Oct;34(10):2253-2259. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.05.021. Epub 2019 May 16.

  PMID: 31128890 BACKGROUND

• Sanger PC, Hartzler A, Han SM, Armstrong CA, Stewart MR, Lordon RJ, Lober WB, Evans HL. Patient perspectives on post-discharge surgical site infections: towards a patient-centered mobile health solution. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 1;9(12):e114016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114016. eCollection 2014.

  PMID: 25436912 BACKGROUND

• Webb CL, Waugh CL, Grigsby J, Busenbark D, Berdusis K, Sahn DJ, Sable CA; American Society of Echocardiography Telemedicine Collaborators' Group. Impact of telemedicine on hospital transport, length of stay, and medical outcomes in infants with suspected heart disease: a multicenter study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013 Sep;26(9):1090-8. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2013.05.018. Epub 2013 Jul 13.

  PMID: 23860093 BACKGROUND

• Hwa K, Wren SM. Telehealth follow-up in lieu of postoperative clinic visit for ambulatory surgery: results of a pilot program. JAMA Surg. 2013 Sep;148(9):823-7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2672.

  PMID: 23842982 BACKGROUND

• Mishra A, Kapoor L, Mishra SK. Post-operative care through tele-follow up visits in patients undergoing thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy in a resource-constrained environment. J Telemed Telecare. 2009;15(2):73-6. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2008.080808.

  PMID: 19246606 BACKGROUND

• Seto E, Leonard KJ, Cafazzo JA, Barnsley J, Masino C, Ross HJ. Mobile phone-based telemonitoring for heart failure management: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2012 Feb 16;14(1):e31. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1909.

  PMID: 22356799 BACKGROUND

• Gray RT, Sut MK, Badger SA, Harvey CF. Post-operative telephone review is cost-effective and acceptable to patients. Ulster Med J. 2010 May;79(2):76-9.

  PMID: 21116423 BACKGROUND

Central Study Contacts

Mina Adly Attia

CONTACT

+201068385238; mina.adly2402@med.aun.edu.eg

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: ECOLOGIC OR COMMUNITY
• Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Resident

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: March 1, 2024
• First Posted: March 7, 2024
• Study Start: April 1, 2024
• Primary Completion: December 1, 2025
• Study Completion: January 1, 2026
• Last Updated: March 7, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-03