Study Stopped
Delays in manufacturing \& increased costs of materials, manufacturing and logistics identified during trial set up caused the trial budget to exceed the available funds and an inability to complete the study within required grant timelines.
Analysing HIgh Dose Probiotic Peanut Oral Immunotherapy (PPOIT) and High Dose Peanut Oral Immunotherapy (OIT) Versus LOw Dose Peanut OIT for Peanut Allergy
HILO
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study will compare the effectiveness of three different treatments to treat peanut allergy
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started May 2024
Typical duration for phase_2
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 29, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 6, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2027
September 19, 2024
August 1, 2024
3 years
February 29, 2024
September 9, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference between the treatment arms in the proportion of participants who achieve remission of peanut allergy at 8 weeks post treatment.
Remission will be assessed 8 weeks after the end of treatment timepoint and is defined as passing (completing without reaction) the double-blind placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) at the end of treatment and at 8 weeks post treatment
22 months
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Difference between the treatment arms in the proportion of participants who achieve full desensitisation of peanut allergy at end of treatment
20 months
Difference between the treatment arms in the exposure-adjusted event rate of adverse events (AE)
20 months
Difference between treatment arms in changes in Quality of Life Scores using the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaires (FAQLQ).
Baseline, 22weeks, 76 weeks, 84 weeks, 128 weeks
Difference between treatment arms in changes in the peanut skin prick test (SPT) wheal size.
Baseline, 76 weeks, 84 weeks,128 weeks
Difference between treatment arms in change from baseline peanut specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) levels
Baseline, 76 weeks, 84 weeks,128 weeks
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
High-dose peanut OIT combined with probiotic (HD PPOIT)
EXPERIMENTALHigh-dose rapid escalation peanut OIT combined with probiotic (HD PPOIT) taken daily for 18 months.
High-dose peanut OIT combined with probiotic placebo (HD OIT)
EXPERIMENTALHigh-dose rapid escalation peanut OIT combined with probiotic placebo (HD OIT) taken daily for 18 months
Low-dose peanut OIT combined with probiotic placebo (LD OIT)
ACTIVE COMPARATORLow-dose slow escalation peanut OIT combined with probiotic placebo (LD OIT) taken daily for 18 months.
Interventions
Peanut oral immunotherapy at varying doses and build-up regimes given daily for 18 months
Probiotic or placebo-probiotic given daily for 18 months
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 1-10 years.
- \>7kg (the weight considered safe for the administration of an adrenaline injector);
- Confirmed diagnosis of peanut allergy as defined by a failed DBPCFC with peanut and a positive SPT or sIgE to peanut at screening;
- Has a legally acceptable representative capable of understanding the informed consent document and providing consent on the participant's behalf
You may not qualify if:
- History of severe anaphylaxis (as defined by persistent hypotension, collapse, loss of consciousness, persistent hypoxia or ever needing more than three (3) doses of intramuscular adrenaline or an intravenous adrenaline infusion for management of an allergic reaction)
- Severe anaphylaxis during the study entry DBPCFC (defined as persistent hypotension, collapse, loss of consciousness, persistent hypoxia, or requiring more than 3 doses of intramuscular adrenaline or an intravenous adrenaline infusion for management of an allergic reaction)
- Ongoing chronic persistent asthma (as per Australian Asthma Foundation guidelines)
- Underlying medical conditions (e.g. cardiac disease) that increase the risks associated with anaphylaxis
- Use of beta-blockers, and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors
- Reacting to the placebo component during the study entry DBPCFC
- Have received other food immunotherapy treatment in the preceding 12 months
- Currently taking immunomodulatory therapy (including allergen immunotherapy)
- Past or current major illness that in the opinion of the Site Investigator may affect the subject's ability to participate in the study e.g. increased risk to the participant
- History of suspected or biopsy-confirmed eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE)
- Subjects who in the opinion of the Site Investigator are unable to follow the protocol
- Another family member already enrolled in the trial (to maintain blinding, safety and equity of access) or in any other clinical trial from the same study group.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Loke P, Orsini F, Lozinsky AC, Gold M, O'Sullivan MD, Quinn P, Lloyd M, Ashley SE, Pitkin S, Axelrad C, Metcalfe JR, Su EL, Tey D, Robinson MN, Allen KJ, Prescott SL, Galvin AD, Tang MLK; PPOIT-003 study group. Probiotic peanut oral immunotherapy versus oral immunotherapy and placebo in children with peanut allergy in Australia (PPOIT-003): a multicentre, randomised, phase 2b trial. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022 Mar;6(3):171-184. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00006-2. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
PMID: 35123664BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Paxton Loke
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Participants, outcome assessors, other research staff, treating clinicians, investigators and trial statistician will be blinded to treatment allocation.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 29, 2024
First Posted
March 6, 2024
Study Start
May 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2027
Last Updated
September 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Beginning 24 months following article publication
- Access Criteria
- These will be made available long-term for use by future researchers from a recognised research institution whose proposed use of the data has been ethically reviewed and approved by an independent committee and who accept MCRI's conditions for access (including any conditions relating to MCRI's intellectual property)
Beginning 24 months after article publication, the following will be made available long-term for use by future researchers from a recognised research institution whose proposed use of the data has been ethically reviewed and approved by an independent committee and who accept MCRI's conditions for access (including any conditions relating to MCRI's intellectual property): * Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article after de-identification (text, tables, figures and appendices) * Trial protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, Informed Consent Form (ICF)