The Impact of Using Different Spinal Needle Sizes on the Efficacy of the Dural Puncture Epidural Block
1 other identifier
interventional
81
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the dural puncture epidural technique (DPET) with either 25-gauge spinal needle or 27-gauge spinal needle versus conventional epidural technique and evaluate whether DPET improves onset and spread of labor analgesia and if there is a role of the usage of different sized needles as regards block efficiency and complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 23, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 29, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 15, 2024
CompletedApril 29, 2025
April 1, 2025
1.1 years
February 23, 2024
April 25, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Onset of analgesia
Duration from injection of the first initial epidural bolus dose to attainment of VAS \<3
20 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Degree of analgesia
5 hours
Study Arms (3)
Conventional epidural group
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional epidural. .
DPE-25G group
ACTIVE COMPARATORDural puncture epidural with 25-gauge spinal needle.
DPE-27G group
ACTIVE COMPARATORDural puncture epidural with 27-gauge spinal needle.
Interventions
Epidural analgesia alone or with dural puncture with different sizes of spinal needles
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASAI \& II parturient in active labor
- Uncomplicated pregnancy with vertex presentation
- Willing to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient's refusal
- Coagulopathy (INR\> 1.5 and platelets \< 80,000)
- Allergy to local anesthetics.
- Prior surgery in lumbosacral spine.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Medidcne, Cairo Univerisity
Cairo, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The details of the series will be unknown to the investigators and the group assignment will be kept in asset of sealed envelopes each bearing only the case number on the outside. Prior to surgery the appropriate numbered envelope will be opened by the nurse, the card inside will determine the patient group.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 23, 2024
First Posted
February 29, 2024
Study Start
January 1, 2021
Primary Completion
January 31, 2022
Study Completion
June 15, 2024
Last Updated
April 29, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share