Impact of Workload and Fatigue on Sleep in OR Nurses
The Impact of Individual Workload and Fatigue Levels on Sleep Perception in Operating Room Nurses: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional and Correlational Study
1 other identifier
observational
250
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to explore the impact of individual workload and fatigue levels on the sleep quality of operating room (OR) nurses, highlighting a critical aspect of healthcare professionals' well-being that directly affects patient safety and care quality. Operating room nurses face unique challenges due to the high-stress, fast-paced environment of surgical settings, which can lead to increased stress levels, emotional challenges, and a higher incidence of fatigue compared to other nursing specialties. Factors contributing to this fatigue include the demanding nature of surgical procedures, the need for constant vigilance, and the irregular hours associated with shift work, all of which can impair sleep quality. The literature review suggests that while the relationship between workload, fatigue, and sleep quality has been extensively studied in general nursing populations, there is a lack of specific focus on operating room nurses. These professionals work under distinct conditions that may exacerbate the effects of workload and fatigue on sleep quality, yet comprehensive studies targeting this group are limited. Understanding the nuances of how workload and fatigue specifically impact the sleep quality of OR nurses is crucial for developing targeted interventions aimed at improving their health and job performance, thereby enhancing patient care and safety. This cross-sectional and correlational study seeks to fill the gap in the literature by examining the specific effects of workload and fatigue on sleep perception among OR nurses. By identifying these relationships, the study aims to contribute valuable insights into strategies for mitigating fatigue and improving sleep among this critical group of healthcare workers, with the ultimate goal of ensuring both nurse well-being and patient safety.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Apr 2024
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 22, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 29, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2024
CompletedFebruary 29, 2024
February 1, 2024
1 month
February 22, 2024
February 22, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Demographic Information Form
This form gathers nurses' demographic details through seven multiple-choice questions, covering aspects like age, gender, marital status, nursing experience, operating room nursing experience, chronic conditions, and regular medication usage.
up to 12 weeks
Individual Workload Perception Scale (IWPS)
Initially developed in 2003 by Cox and colleagues and later adapted to Turkish in 2011 by Saygılı and Çelik, the IWPS assesses workload perception with a reliability coefficient of 0.894. It comprises 31 items across five categories: Supervisor Support, Colleague Support, Unit Support, Work Environment Workload Features, and Job Sustainability. Scoring is done on a 5-point Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 31 to 155, where higher scores suggest a more positive perception of workload.
up to 12 weeks
Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFS)
The CFS, developed by Chalder et al. in 1993 and revised in 2010, is designed to measure fatigue levels. It includes two subscales for Physical and Mental Fatigue, with reliability ranging from 0.72 to 0.87. The scale consists of 11 items, which can be scored using either a bi-modal (0-1) or a 4-point Likert scale (0-3), with higher scores indicating greater fatigue levels.
up to 12 weeks
Richard-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ)
Developed in 1987 by Richards, the RCSQ aims to evaluate different aspects of sleep quality using 6 items scored on a scale from 0 to 100. The Turkish version's reliability, assessed by Karaman Özlü and Özer in 2015, stands at 0.91. Higher scores on this scale denote better sleep quality, with detailed scoring ranges indicating varying levels of sleep quality from very poor to excellent.
up to 12 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
The study focuses on operating room (OR) nurses with at least one year of experience in various hospitals. These participants are chosen for their specialized knowledge in the surgical environment, ensuring they provide insights into workload, fatigue, and sleep quality. Inclusion is based on voluntary consent, aiming to collect data from a group well-versed in the unique challenges and stressors of OR settings. This demographic is particularly valuable for exploring how their demanding roles affect sleep and well-being.
You may qualify if:
- Nurses who have been working as operating room nurses in the hospitals where the study is conducted for at least one year,
- Nurses who are willing to participate in the study will be included.
You may not qualify if:
- Data from nurses who wish to withdraw from the study at any stage will be excluded from the research.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Kilis 7 Aralik Universitylead
- Hasan Kalyoncu Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Islam Elagöz
Kilis, 79100, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
islam elagöz, MsC
devlet hastanesi
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Target Duration
- 1 Year
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Researcher Asisstan
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 22, 2024
First Posted
February 29, 2024
Study Start
April 1, 2024
Primary Completion
May 1, 2024
Study Completion
June 1, 2024
Last Updated
February 29, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The IPD sharing plan ensures confidentiality and ethical compliance, using a secure, anonymized database for data access by verified researchers post-publication. Key aspects include anonymization, controlled access, a data use agreement, a sharing timeline, supporting documentation, and ethical oversight. This strategy balances scientific advancement with participant privacy.