NCT06283823

Brief Summary

The retention is one of the stages of orthodontic treatment that aims to keep the teeth in the correct positions after orthodontic treatment. Without a retention phase, there is a tendency for the teeth to return to their initial position (relapse). To prevent relapse, at the end of orthodontic therapy the use of retaining devices to keep the teeth in their ideal position is required. The aim of the study is to analyse whether intraoral aging of removable retention devices can lead to morphological or dimensional changes, and whether or not these changes are related to orthodontic relapse, expressed as a change in the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index. The PAR index is an index that allows us to evaluate the relapse after orthodontic treatment. In this study the PAR index will be measured at the start of the retention period (T0), at the three-months follow-up (T1) and at the six months follow-up (T2). In particular, two types of thermoformed retainers with different cutouts will be evaluated to determine whether the presence of higher margins in a type of retainers allows to maintain greater stability over time and, therefore, to confer a mechanical and clinical advantage.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
41

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2021

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 21, 2021

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 21, 2024

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 28, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2024

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

April 1, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

February 21, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 26, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

orthodonticretainerstabilitythermoformable retainer

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index

    The PAR index will be measured on digital casts to evaluate the amount of alignment relapse.

    3 years

  • Volumetric superimposition of digital models

    Digital models of pre- and post-usage thermoformed retainers will be superimposed and the distance between the two digital models will be measured

    3 years

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Thickness

    3 years

Study Arms (2)

Retainer with high margins

Thermoformed retainers with modified cutout and high margins in the posterior region of the retainer

Device: Thermoformed orthodontic retainer

Retainer with low margins

Thermoformed retainer with conventional festooned cutout and low margins

Device: Thermoformed orthodontic retainer

Interventions

compare the outcome of the retaining phase of the orthodontic treatment with two different thermoformed retainers

Retainer with high marginsRetainer with low margins

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 35 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Undergraduate students

You may qualify if:

  • young adult patients: 18-35 years;
  • Caucasian ethnic group;
  • good oral hygiene (evaluated by observing a plaque index \< 20% understood as the sum of the indices of the individual dental elements divided by the number of dental elements considered multiplied by 100);
  • patients with normal occlusion Class I occlusion with slight overcrowding and PAR Index less than or equal to 10;
  • patients who have received previous orthodontic treatment, with or without stripping;
  • patients who have received previous orthodontic treatment with \< 20 orthodontic aligners;
  • patients who currently use a thermoprinted mask as a restraint, or who do not use any restraint but who would like to receive one.

You may not qualify if:

  • patients with chromosomal defects, specific neuropsychological disorder, epilepsy (1);
  • patients with systemic diseases and comorbidities;
  • bruxist patients;
  • patients with hypertrophy of chewing muscles, occlusal parafunctions or joint disorders;
  • patients with cognitive disabilities with IQ\<70;
  • patients undergoing drug therapy.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of L'Aquila

L’Aquila, Italy, 67100, Italy

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Bucci R, Rongo R, Levate C, Michelotti A, Barone S, Razionale AV, D'Anto V. Thickness of orthodontic clear aligners after thermoforming and after 10 days of intraoral exposure: a prospective clinical study. Prog Orthod. 2019 Sep 9;20(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40510-019-0289-6.

    PMID: 31495908BACKGROUND
  • Saghaei M. Random allocation software for parallel group randomized trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004 Nov 9;4:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-4-26.

    PMID: 15535880BACKGROUND
  • Schuster S, Eliades G, Zinelis S, Eliades T, Bradley TG. Structural conformation and leaching from in vitro aged and retrieved Invisalign appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Dec;126(6):725-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.04.021.

    PMID: 15592222BACKGROUND
  • Gerard Bradley T, Teske L, Eliades G, Zinelis S, Eliades T. Do the mechanical and chemical properties of InvisalignTM appliances change after use? A retrieval analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2016 Feb;38(1):27-31. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv003. Epub 2015 Mar 3.

    PMID: 25740599BACKGROUND
  • Lombardo L, Arreghini A, Maccarrone R, Bianchi A, Scalia S, Siciliani G. Optical properties of orthodontic aligners--spectrophotometry analysis of three types before and after aging. Prog Orthod. 2015;16:41. doi: 10.1186/s40510-015-0111-z. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

    PMID: 26582007BACKGROUND
  • Thickett E, Power S. A randomized clinical trial of thermoplastic retainer wear. Eur J Orthod. 2010 Feb;32(1):1-5. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp061. Epub 2009 Oct 14.

    PMID: 19828592BACKGROUND
  • Richmond S, Shaw WC, O'Brien KD, Buchanan IB, Jones R, Stephens CD, Roberts CT, Andrews M. The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod. 1992 Apr;14(2):125-39. doi: 10.1093/ejo/14.2.125.

    PMID: 1582457BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Michele Tepedino

    University of L'Aquila

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 21, 2024

First Posted

February 28, 2024

Study Start

December 21, 2021

Primary Completion

April 1, 2024

Study Completion

September 30, 2024

Last Updated

April 1, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Locations