Neuraxial Ultrasound Device Study
Real-time Spine Ultrasound Imaging System: Data Collection Study
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to develop a device that can eliminate failed neuraxial placements in challenging patients.The study will attempt to improve safety and efficacy of neuraxial anesthesia with high precision real-time needle visualization through automated real-time needle guidance at the bedside with an experimental device (Accuro 3S). Investigators will verify the clinical workflow for utilizing the Accuro 3S during epidural and spinal procedures and validation of needle visualization while using the device as well as anatomical guidance provided by the device during spinal imaging.The underlying bone imaging enhancement algorithms were introduced in the commercially available FDA approved Accuro. The Accuro 3S will be used to establish needle insertion point and trajectory, after which the clinician will use standard of care methods to advance the needle such as the loss of resistance method.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 20, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 28, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 15, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2027
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2027
April 24, 2026
April 1, 2026
7 months
February 20, 2024
April 21, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of difficult block placement
Difficult block placement is defined by need of \> 2 needle insertion attempts for succesful neuraxial analgesia/anesthesia
15 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Incidence of failed block
30 minutes
Incidence of post-dural puncture headache
7 days
Study Arms (1)
Intrathecal neuraxial procedure
EXPERIMENTALParticipants undergoing surgery, receiving neuraxial intrathecal anesthesia with block placement in part by the investigational device.
Interventions
Device to assist in placement of epidural procedure
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18 years or older
- The patient is eligible for placement of neuraxial anesthesia, and the patient has agreed to the procedure.
- Patient skin is intact in the area of placement of the epidural or spinal anesthesia.
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindication to epidural catheter placement including bleeding diathesis (essential thrombocythemia, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, von Willebrand disease, and hemophilia A or B), neurological dysfunction (multiple sclerosis, subacute myeloopticoneuropathy or preexisting lower limb neurological deficit), prior extensive spinal surgery or major spinal deformity, pre-operative use of anti-coagulant with planned use of therapeutic dose of anti-coagulant in post-operatively, documented pre-operative coagulopathy (INR greater than 1.3 not on Coumadin or PTT greater than 42), platelets less than 70,000/μL, or evidence of infection at potential epidural site.
- Presence of orthopedic implants in the spine.
- Skin dyscrasias or allergies to the ultrasound procedure.
- Unable to assume sitting position.
- Body Mass Index (BMI) less than 20 kg/m2.
- Known allergies to ultrasound gel.
- Known history of allergic reactions to adhesives used in standard epidural placement
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Stanford Universitylead
- Rivanna Medical, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Stanford University
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
Related Publications (8)
Boselli E, Hopkins P, Lamperti M, Estebe JP, Fuzier R, Biasucci DG, Disma N, Pittiruti M, Traskaite V, Macas A, Breschan C, Vailati D, Subert M. European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Guidelines on peri-operative use of ultrasound for regional anaesthesia (PERSEUS regional anesthesia): Peripheral nerves blocks and neuraxial anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Mar 1;38(3):219-250. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001383.
PMID: 33186303BACKGROUNDPractice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology. Anesthesiology. 2016 Feb;124(2):270-300. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000935. No abstract available.
PMID: 26580836BACKGROUNDRing L, Landau R, Delgado C. The Current Role of General Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2021;11(1):18-27. doi: 10.1007/s40140-021-00437-6. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
PMID: 33642943BACKGROUNDRajagopalan S, Shah K, Guffey D, Tran C, Suresh M, Wali A. Predictors of difficult epidural placement in pregnant women: A trainees' perspective. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Oct-Dec;35(4):548-552. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_340_18.
PMID: 31920244BACKGROUNDIsmail S, Raza A, Munshi K, Tabassum R. Failure rate of labor epidural: An observational study among different levels of trainee anesthesiologists in a university hospital of a developing country. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Apr-Jun;37(2):210-215. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_39_19. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
PMID: 34349368BACKGROUNDCittadini G, Martinoli C. [Ultrasound and the bone: a difficult relationship]. Radiol Med. 1995 Jan-Feb;89(1-2):12-7. Italian.
PMID: 7716291BACKGROUNDMao Q, He H, Lu Y, Hu Y, Wang Z, Gan M, Yan H, Chen L. Ultrasound probe tilt impedes the needle-beam alignment during the ultrasound-guided procedures. Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 15;11(1):1599. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81354-w.
PMID: 33452406BACKGROUNDTiouririne M, Dixon AJ, Mauldin FW Jr, Scalzo D, Krishnaraj A. Imaging Performance of a Handheld Ultrasound System With Real-Time Computer-Aided Detection of Lumbar Spine Anatomy: A Feasibility Study. Invest Radiol. 2017 Aug;52(8):447-455. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000361.
PMID: 28230717BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Clemens Ortner, MD
Stanford University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 20, 2024
First Posted
February 28, 2024
Study Start (Estimated)
December 15, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
April 24, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share