NCT06281249

Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to develop a device that can eliminate failed neuraxial placements in challenging patients.The study will attempt to improve safety and efficacy of neuraxial anesthesia with high precision real-time needle visualization through automated real-time needle guidance at the bedside with an experimental device (Accuro 3S). Investigators will verify the clinical workflow for utilizing the Accuro 3S during epidural and spinal procedures and validation of needle visualization while using the device as well as anatomical guidance provided by the device during spinal imaging.The underlying bone imaging enhancement algorithms were introduced in the commercially available FDA approved Accuro. The Accuro 3S will be used to establish needle insertion point and trajectory, after which the clinician will use standard of care methods to advance the needle such as the loss of resistance method.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
12mo left

Started Dec 2026

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 20, 2024

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 28, 2024

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 15, 2026

Expected
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2027

5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2027

Last Updated

April 24, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

February 20, 2024

Last Update Submit

April 21, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Incidence of difficult block placement

    Difficult block placement is defined by need of \> 2 needle insertion attempts for succesful neuraxial analgesia/anesthesia

    15 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Incidence of failed block

    30 minutes

  • Incidence of post-dural puncture headache

    7 days

Study Arms (1)

Intrathecal neuraxial procedure

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants undergoing surgery, receiving neuraxial intrathecal anesthesia with block placement in part by the investigational device.

Device: Ultrasound placement device

Interventions

Device to assist in placement of epidural procedure

Also known as: Accuro 3S
Intrathecal neuraxial procedure

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged 18 years or older
  • The patient is eligible for placement of neuraxial anesthesia, and the patient has agreed to the procedure.
  • Patient skin is intact in the area of placement of the epidural or spinal anesthesia.

You may not qualify if:

  • Contraindication to epidural catheter placement including bleeding diathesis (essential thrombocythemia, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, von Willebrand disease, and hemophilia A or B), neurological dysfunction (multiple sclerosis, subacute myeloopticoneuropathy or preexisting lower limb neurological deficit), prior extensive spinal surgery or major spinal deformity, pre-operative use of anti-coagulant with planned use of therapeutic dose of anti-coagulant in post-operatively, documented pre-operative coagulopathy (INR greater than 1.3 not on Coumadin or PTT greater than 42), platelets less than 70,000/μL, or evidence of infection at potential epidural site.
  • Presence of orthopedic implants in the spine.
  • Skin dyscrasias or allergies to the ultrasound procedure.
  • Unable to assume sitting position.
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) less than 20 kg/m2.
  • Known allergies to ultrasound gel.
  • Known history of allergic reactions to adhesives used in standard epidural placement

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Stanford University

Stanford, California, 94305, United States

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Boselli E, Hopkins P, Lamperti M, Estebe JP, Fuzier R, Biasucci DG, Disma N, Pittiruti M, Traskaite V, Macas A, Breschan C, Vailati D, Subert M. European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Guidelines on peri-operative use of ultrasound for regional anaesthesia (PERSEUS regional anesthesia): Peripheral nerves blocks and neuraxial anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Mar 1;38(3):219-250. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001383.

    PMID: 33186303BACKGROUND
  • Practice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology. Anesthesiology. 2016 Feb;124(2):270-300. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000935. No abstract available.

    PMID: 26580836BACKGROUND
  • Ring L, Landau R, Delgado C. The Current Role of General Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2021;11(1):18-27. doi: 10.1007/s40140-021-00437-6. Epub 2021 Feb 24.

    PMID: 33642943BACKGROUND
  • Rajagopalan S, Shah K, Guffey D, Tran C, Suresh M, Wali A. Predictors of difficult epidural placement in pregnant women: A trainees' perspective. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Oct-Dec;35(4):548-552. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_340_18.

    PMID: 31920244BACKGROUND
  • Ismail S, Raza A, Munshi K, Tabassum R. Failure rate of labor epidural: An observational study among different levels of trainee anesthesiologists in a university hospital of a developing country. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Apr-Jun;37(2):210-215. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_39_19. Epub 2021 Jul 15.

    PMID: 34349368BACKGROUND
  • Cittadini G, Martinoli C. [Ultrasound and the bone: a difficult relationship]. Radiol Med. 1995 Jan-Feb;89(1-2):12-7. Italian.

    PMID: 7716291BACKGROUND
  • Mao Q, He H, Lu Y, Hu Y, Wang Z, Gan M, Yan H, Chen L. Ultrasound probe tilt impedes the needle-beam alignment during the ultrasound-guided procedures. Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 15;11(1):1599. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81354-w.

    PMID: 33452406BACKGROUND
  • Tiouririne M, Dixon AJ, Mauldin FW Jr, Scalzo D, Krishnaraj A. Imaging Performance of a Handheld Ultrasound System With Real-Time Computer-Aided Detection of Lumbar Spine Anatomy: A Feasibility Study. Invest Radiol. 2017 Aug;52(8):447-455. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000361.

    PMID: 28230717BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Labor Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Clemens Ortner, MD

    Stanford University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2024

First Posted

February 28, 2024

Study Start (Estimated)

December 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Last Updated

April 24, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations