NCT06276127

Brief Summary

INTRODUCTION: The study focuses on comparing the effectiveness of oral Bisoprolol, a beta-1 adrenergic receptor blocker, against intravenous Diltiazem, a calcium channel blocker, in treating rapid atrial fibrillation or flutter with rapid ventricular response in an emergency setting. This research aims to fill the gap in empirical evidence regarding the use of oral Bisoprolol for these conditions, potentially offering a convenient, evidence-based alternative for patient management in emergency departments where established protocols are lacking. METHOD: This study is a randomized controlled trial targeting patients who present to the emergency room with symptomatic atrial fibrillation or flutter and rapid ventricular response requiring intervention. Participants will be split into two groups and undergo continuous monitoring of vital signs and regular electrocardiograms to ensure safety and document any adverse effects. The primary focus is on patient safety while evaluating the efficacy of the treatments. AIM: Evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral bisoprolol in treating atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter with rapid ventricular response in an emergency department setting. PRIMARY OJECTIVES: The primary efficacy outcome will be evaluated by achieving a HR\<110 beats per minute or a decrease ≥20% of baseline HR at 60 minutes. The primary safety outcome measures are HR \< 60 bpm and SBP \< 95 mm Hg. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: The use of Rescue medication, proportion of patients who required hospitalization, worsening of heart failure or pulmonary oedema, side effect of medication ( dizziness, headaches, gastrointestinal symptoms) PATEINT POPULATION: Adults (18 and older) presenting to the emergency department at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital with symptomatic atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter with rapid ventricular response requiring treatment. INTERVENTION: A single oral dose of 5 mg Bisoprolol (maximum dose of 5 mg) or a single intravenous dose of Diltiazem at 0.25 mg/kg (to a maximum dose of 30 mg). CLINICAL MEASURMENT: Heart rate recorded every 15 minutes up to the 90-minute mark, with a 12-lead ECG performed every 30 minutes. OUTCOME: For therapy to be considered effective, patients must achieve a ventricular rate ≤110/min or experience a drop-in ventricular rate of at least 20% at 60 minutes.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
13mo left

Started Apr 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress51%
Apr 2025Jun 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 18, 2024

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 23, 2024

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2025

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2027

Expected
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2027

Last Updated

March 14, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

February 18, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 11, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

BisoprololAFDiltiazemAtrial flutter

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Efficacy Outcome Evaluated by Achieving the Target Heart Rate Reduction

    The primary efficacy outcome evaluated by achieving a HR\<110 beats per minute or a decrease ≥20% of baseline HR at 60 minutes

    at 60 minutes

  • Safety Outcome Evaluated by the Presence of serious adverse event

    The primary safety outcome measures were HR \< 60 bpm and SBP \< 95 mm Hg

    at 60 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • The use of Rescue medication

    60 minutes

  • Proportion of patients who required hospitalization

    90 minutes

  • ED revisit

    First 48 hour from discharge

  • Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Related Adverse Events

    First 48 hour after receive intervention

Study Arms (2)

Oral Bisoprolol

EXPERIMENTAL

A single oral dose of 5 mg Bisoprolol (maximum dose of 5 mg)

Drug: Oral Bisoprolol

Intravenous Diltiazem

OTHER

single intravenous dose of Diltiazem at 0.25 mg/kg (to a maximum dose of 30 mg)

Drug: Intravenous Diltiazem

Interventions

Participants in this group will receive a single oral dose of Bisoprolol, set at a dosage of 5 mg, with a maximum dose limit of 5 mg.

Also known as: Bisoprolol hemifumarate
Oral Bisoprolol

Participants in this group will be administered a single intravenous dose of diltiazem at a dosage of 0.25 mg/kg, with a maximum dose capped at 30 mg.

Also known as: Diltiazem nondihydropyridine calcium channel blocker
Intravenous Diltiazem

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • ≥ 18 years old.
  • Atrial fibrillation (RVR) or Atrial flutter on electrocardiogram.
  • Heart rate \>120 beats/min
  • Stable patient with stable vital signs (Defined as having a SBP \>110 mmHg, oxygen saturation \> 94% on room air or with a simple face mask, a respiratory rate within normal limits, being conscious and oriented, and not having any concurrent life-threatening conditions such as myocardial infarction (MI) or Class IV heart failure).
  • Mentally competent patient who can understand and sign the consent form.

You may not qualify if:

  • Acute myocardial infarction.
  • Known congenital and acquired valvular defects.
  • Pre-excitation syndromes.
  • Ventricular rate \> 220beats/min.
  • Administration of AV nodal blocking agents within the previous 24 h (beta blockers, non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, digoxin and amiodarone or receiving regular maintains oral dose).
  • Allergy to either bisoprolol or diltiazem.
  • Severe hepatic and renal failure.
  • Pregnancy / breastfeeding.
  • A history of cocaine or methamphetamine use within 24 hours before arrival.
  • Known Asthmatic.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Sultan Qaboos University Hospital

Muscat, Al-khod, 38, Oman

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Fromm C, Suau SJ, Cohen V, Likourezos A, Jellinek-Cohen S, Rose J, Marshall J. Diltiazem vs. Metoprolol in the Management of Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter with Rapid Ventricular Rate in the Emergency Department. J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;49(2):175-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.01.014. Epub 2015 Apr 22.

    PMID: 25913166BACKGROUND
  • January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, Conti JB, Ellinor PT, Ezekowitz MD, Field ME, Murray KT, Sacco RL, Stevenson WG, Tchou PJ, Tracy CM, Yancy CW; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 2;64(21):e1-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.022. Epub 2014 Mar 28. No abstract available.

    PMID: 24685669BACKGROUND
  • Posen A, Bursua A, Petzel R. DOsing Strategy Effectiveness of Diltiazem in Atrial Fibrillation With Rapid Ventricular Response. Ann Emerg Med. 2023 Mar;81(3):288-296. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.08.462. Epub 2022 Nov 17.

    PMID: 36402632BACKGROUND
  • Saksena S, Slee A, Waldo AL, Freemantle N, Reynolds M, Rosenberg Y, Rathod S, Grant S, Thomas E, Wyse DG. Cardiovascular outcomes in the AFFIRM Trial (Atrial Fibrillation Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management). An assessment of individual antiarrhythmic drug therapies compared with rate control with propensity score-matched analyses. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Nov 1;58(19):1975-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.07.036.

    PMID: 22032709BACKGROUND
  • Groenveld HF, Crijns HJ, Tijssen JG, Alings M, Hillege HL, Tuininga YS, Van den Berg MP, Van Veldhuisen DJ, Van Gelder IC. Rate control in atrial fibrillation, insight into the RACE II study. Neth Heart J. 2013 Apr;21(4):199-204. doi: 10.1007/s12471-013-0391-1. No abstract available.

    PMID: 23468405BACKGROUND
  • Bakheit AH, Ali R, Alshahrani AD, El-Azab AS. Bisoprolol: A comprehensive profile. Profiles Drug Subst Excip Relat Methodol. 2021;46:51-89. doi: 10.1016/bs.podrm.2020.07.006. Epub 2020 Sep 8.

    PMID: 33461700BACKGROUND
  • clinical_evaluation_of_bisoprolol_in_the_treatment.31.

    BACKGROUND
  • Ishiguro H, Ikeda T, Abe A, Tsukada T, Mera H, Nakamura K, Yusu S, Yoshino H. Antiarrhythmic effect of bisoprolol, a highly selective beta1-blocker, in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Int Heart J. 2008 May;49(3):281-93. doi: 10.1536/ihj.49.281.

    PMID: 18612186BACKGROUND
  • A randomized trial of beta-blockade in heart failure. The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS). CIBIS Investigators and Committees. Circulation. 1994 Oct;90(4):1765-73. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.90.4.1765.

    PMID: 7923660BACKGROUND
  • The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II (CIBIS-II)-.

    BACKGROUND
  • Demircan C, Cikriklar HI, Engindeniz Z, Cebicci H, Atar N, Guler V, Unlu EO, Ozdemir B. Comparison of the effectiveness of intravenous diltiazem and metoprolol in the management of rapid ventricular rate in atrial fibrillation. Emerg Med J. 2005 Jun;22(6):411-4. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.012047.

    PMID: 15911947BACKGROUND
  • Hasbrouck M, Nguyen TT. Acute management of atrial fibrillation in congestive heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Aug;58:39-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.03.058. Epub 2022 Apr 6.

    PMID: 35623182BACKGROUND
  • Nicholson J, Czosnowski Q, Flack T, Pang PS, Billups K. Hemodynamic comparison of intravenous push diltiazem versus metoprolol for atrial fibrillation rate control. Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Sep;38(9):1879-1883. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.06.034. Epub 2020 Jun 21.

    PMID: 32745920BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atrial Flutter

Interventions

Bisoprolol

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PhenoxypropanolaminesPropanolaminesAmino AlcoholsAlcoholsOrganic ChemicalsPropanolsAmines

Study Officials

  • Usama Al Khalasi, MD

    The Medical City for Military & Security Services, Oman

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Fatin ALOmairi, MD

CONTACT

Fatin AlOmairi, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
While the treating physician, nurse, and the patient will not be blinded to the treatment, the statistician analyzing it will remain blinded to treatment allocations.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Study Design: Open-label, randomized controlled trial. Participants: Patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter and rapid ventricular rate. Treatment Arms: Oral Bisoprolol vs. Intravenous Diltiazem. Randomization: Subjects randomly assigned to either treatment group. Primary Endpoint: Reduction of heart rate to a target level within a specific timeframe. Secondary Outcomes: Adverse effects, hospital admission rates, additional rate control needs. Objective: Compare effectiveness and safety of oral Bisoprolol to intravenous Diltiazem. Monitoring: Continuous observation of vital signs and electrocardiograms for safety.
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Resident, Emergency Medicine, OMSB

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2024

First Posted

February 23, 2024

Study Start

April 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Last Updated

March 14, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Will share the Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) to enhance transparency and provide detailed insights into our study's design, methodologies, statistical analyses, and inclusion criteria.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
Time Frame
Data from our study will be available soon after its completion and will remain accessible for a period of 3 years.
Access Criteria
Open Access Policy: The document is accessible to anyone who requests it, promoting widespread dissemination.

Locations