Diagnostic Performance of CIM for Helicobacter Pylori Infection in Patients With Peptic Ulcer Bleeding
CIM
Diagnostic Performance of Current Infection Marker (CIM) for Helicobacter Pylori Infection in Patients With Peptic Ulcer Bleeding
1 other identifier
observational
135
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this cross-sectional study is to evaluate the efficacy of current infection marker (CIM) method for H. pylori detection. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- To evaluate the efficacy of CIM method for H. pylori detection compared to rapid urease test(RUT), histopathology, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and urea breath test (UBT) in patients who presented with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage from peptic ulcer, and their sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio.
- To evaluate the advantages of CIM method for H. pylori detection comparing to RUT, histopathology, PCR, and UBT in patients who presented with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage from peptic ulcer as net reclassification index (NRI).
- To study the associated factors in false negative value of H. pylori detection methods with CIM, RUT, histopathology, PCR, and UBT.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Mar 2024
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 7, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 22, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2024
CompletedFebruary 22, 2024
February 1, 2024
7 months
February 7, 2024
February 15, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The efficacy of CIM method for H. pylori detection
The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the CIM method for H. pylori detection were compared to those of RUT, histopathology, PCR, and UBT.
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The advantages of CIM method for H. pylori detection
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Study Arms (1)
Intervention group
Patients aged 18 years and older who present with peptic ulcer hemorrhage, confirmed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD).
Eligibility Criteria
Patients aged 18 years or older, who present with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage and undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy, receiving a diagnosis of peptic ulcer, will be recruited and enrolled. The exclusion criteria include patients with inappropriate gastric mucosal biopsy conditions, such as hemodynamic instability, coagulopathy, severe thrombocytopenia, or the presence of massive bloody content in the gastric cavity or duodenum. Additionally, individuals with a previous history of gastric surgery, such as partial or total gastrectomy, will be excluded.
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage and undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy with diagnosis of peptic ulcer
You may not qualify if:
- Inappropriate gastric mucosal biopsy conditions such as hemodynamic instability, coagulopathy or severe thrombocytopenia or massive bloody content in gastric cavity or duodenum
- Previous history of gastric surgery such as partial or total gastrectomy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand
Related Publications (32)
Warren JR, Marshall B. Unidentified curved bacilli on gastric epithelium in active chronic gastritis. Lancet. 1983 Jun 4;1(8336):1273-5. No abstract available.
PMID: 6134060RESULTPounder RE, Ng D. The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in different countries. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1995;9 Suppl 2:33-9.
PMID: 8547526RESULTHooi JKY, Lai WY, Ng WK, Suen MMY, Underwood FE, Tanyingoh D, Malfertheiner P, Graham DY, Wong VWS, Wu JCY, Chan FKL, Sung JJY, Kaplan GG, Ng SC. Global Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori Infection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology. 2017 Aug;153(2):420-429. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.022. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
PMID: 28456631RESULTSirinthornpunya S. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with peptic disease. J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Mar;95 Suppl 3:S22-7.
PMID: 22619883RESULTHentschel E, Brandstatter G, Dragosics B, Hirschl AM, Nemec H, Schutze K, Taufer M, Wurzer H. Effect of ranitidine and amoxicillin plus metronidazole on the eradication of Helicobacter pylori and the recurrence of duodenal ulcer. N Engl J Med. 1993 Feb 4;328(5):308-12. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199302043280503.
PMID: 8419816RESULTMoayyedi P. The health economics of Helicobacter pylori infection. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;21(2):347-61. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2006.11.004.
PMID: 17382282RESULTFord AC, Moayyedi P. Whom should we "test and treat" for Helicobacter pylori? BMJ. 2014 May 20;348:g3320. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3320. No abstract available.
PMID: 24846521RESULTMcColl KE. Clinical practice. Helicobacter pylori infection. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 29;362(17):1597-604. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1001110. No abstract available.
PMID: 20427808RESULTCiociola AA, McSorley DJ, Turner K, Sykes D, Palmer JB. Helicobacter pylori infection rates in duodenal ulcer patients in the United States may be lower than previously estimated. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Jul;94(7):1834-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01214.x.
PMID: 10406244RESULTTsuji H, Kohli Y, Fukumitsu S, Morita K, Kaneko H, Ohkawara T, Minami M, Ueda K, Sawa Y, Matsuzaki H, Morinaga O, Ohkawara Y. Helicobacter pylori-negative gastric and duodenal ulcers. J Gastroenterol. 1999 Aug;34(4):455-60. doi: 10.1007/s005350050296.
PMID: 10452677RESULTVu C, Ng YY. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer disease in a Singapore hospital. Singapore Med J. 2000 Oct;41(10):478-81.
PMID: 11281437RESULTZhang W, Liang X, Chen X, Ge Z, Lu H. Time trends in the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with peptic ulcer disease: a single-center retrospective study in Shanghai. J Int Med Res. 2021 Oct;49(10):3000605211051167. doi: 10.1177/03000605211051167.
PMID: 34686094RESULTLanas A, Chan FKL. Peptic ulcer disease. Lancet. 2017 Aug 5;390(10094):613-624. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32404-7. Epub 2017 Feb 25.
PMID: 28242110RESULTJaspersen D, Koerner T, Schorr W, Brennenstuhl M, Raschka C, Hammar CH. Helicobacter pylori eradication reduces the rate of rebleeding in ulcer hemorrhage. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995 Jan;41(1):5-7. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(95)70267-9.
PMID: 7698624RESULTRokkas T, Karameris A, Mavrogeorgis A, Rallis E, Giannikos N. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori reduces the possibility of rebleeding in peptic ulcer disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995 Jan;41(1):1-4. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(95)70266-0.
PMID: 7698617RESULTFitzGerald R, Smith SM. An Overview of Helicobacter pylori Infection. Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2283:1-14. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1302-3_1.
PMID: 33765303RESULTPatel SK, Pratap CB, Jain AK, Gulati AK, Nath G. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori: what should be the gold standard? World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep 28;20(36):12847-59. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i36.12847.
PMID: 25278682RESULTChey WD, Wong BC; Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. American College of Gastroenterology guideline on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug;102(8):1808-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01393.x. Epub 2007 Jun 29.
PMID: 17608775RESULTGralnek IM, Dumonceau JM, Kuipers EJ, Lanas A, Sanders DS, Kurien M, Rotondano G, Hucl T, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Marmo R, Racz I, Arezzo A, Hoffmann RT, Lesur G, de Franchis R, Aabakken L, Veitch A, Radaelli F, Salgueiro P, Cardoso R, Maia L, Zullo A, Cipolletta L, Hassan C. Diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2015 Oct;47(10):a1-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393172. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
PMID: 26417980RESULTLaine L, Barkun AN, Saltzman JR, Martel M, Leontiadis GI. ACG Clinical Guideline: Upper Gastrointestinal and Ulcer Bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 May 1;116(5):899-917. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001245.
PMID: 33929377RESULTLee JM, Breslin NP, Fallon C, O'Morain CA. Rapid urease tests lack sensitivity in Helicobacter pylori diagnosis when peptic ulcer disease presents with bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 May;95(5):1166-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02004.x.
PMID: 10811322RESULTGatta L, Vakil N, Ricci C, Osborn JF, Tampieri A, Perna F, Miglioli M, Vaira D. Effect of proton pump inhibitors and antacid therapy on 13C urea breath tests and stool test for Helicobacter pylori infection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 May;99(5):823-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30162.x.
PMID: 15128344RESULTGisbert JP, Abraira V. Accuracy of Helicobacter pylori diagnostic tests in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Apr;101(4):848-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00528.x. Epub 2006 Feb 22.
PMID: 16494583RESULTSingh V, Mishra S, Rao GR, Jain AK, Dixit VK, Gulati AK, Mahajan D, McClelland M, Nath G. Evaluation of nested PCR in detection of Helicobacter pylori targeting a highly conserved gene: HSP60. Helicobacter. 2008 Feb;13(1):30-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2008.00573.x.
PMID: 18205663RESULTJehanne Q, Benejat L, Megraud F, Bessede E, Lehours P. Evaluation of the Allplex H pylori and ClariR PCR Assay for Helicobacter pylori detection on gastric biopsies. Helicobacter. 2020 Aug;25(4):e12702. doi: 10.1111/hel.12702. Epub 2020 May 19.
PMID: 32426894RESULTLoy CT, Irwig LM, Katelaris PH, Talley NJ. Do commercial serological kits for Helicobacter pylori infection differ in accuracy? A meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Jun;91(6):1138-44.
PMID: 8651160RESULTMohammadian T, Ganji L. The Diagnostic Tests for Detection of Helicobacter pylori Infection. Monoclon Antib Immunodiagn Immunother. 2019 Feb;38(1):1-7. doi: 10.1089/mab.2018.0032. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
PMID: 30648911RESULTRahman SH, Azam MG, Rahman MA, Arfin MS, Alam MM, Bhuiyan TM, Ahmed N, Rahman M, Nahar S, Hassan MS. Non-invasive diagnosis of H pylori infection: evaluation of serological tests with and without current infection marker CIM. World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Feb 28;14(8):1231-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.1231.
PMID: 18300349RESULTWang XY, Yang Y, Shi RH, Ho B, Wang HD, Zhang GX. An evaluation of a serologic test with a current infection marker of Helicobacter pylori before and after eradication therapy in Chinese. Helicobacter. 2008 Feb;13(1):49-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2008.00578.x.
PMID: 18205666RESULTForrest JA, Finlayson ND, Shearman DJ. Endoscopy in gastrointestinal bleeding. Lancet. 1974 Aug 17;2(7877):394-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91770-x. No abstract available.
PMID: 4136718RESULTGralnek IM, Barkun AN, Bardou M. Management of acute bleeding from a peptic ulcer. N Engl J Med. 2008 Aug 28;359(9):928-37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0706113. No abstract available.
PMID: 18753649RESULTBanks M, Graham D, Jansen M, Gotoda T, Coda S, di Pietro M, Uedo N, Bhandari P, Pritchard DM, Kuipers EJ, Rodriguez-Justo M, Novelli MR, Ragunath K, Shepherd N, Dinis-Ribeiro M. British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of patients at risk of gastric adenocarcinoma. Gut. 2019 Sep;68(9):1545-1575. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-318126. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
PMID: 31278206RESULT
Biospecimen
Participants underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with random biopsies of two pieces of gastric mucosa: one from the antrum and another from the incisura angularis. Subsequently, PCR was performed for the detection of H. pylori DNA.
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Monthira Maneerattanaporn, Asso Prof
Department of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 7, 2024
First Posted
February 22, 2024
Study Start
March 1, 2024
Primary Completion
September 30, 2024
Study Completion
December 31, 2024
Last Updated
February 22, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share