Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With Exercise in Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Introduction. At the neurophysiological level, it is possible to observe an increase in the central processing of pain in patients diagnosed with persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome (PSPS-T1/2), potentially stemming from dysfunctions in the endogenous facilitation and inhibition of pain. Administration of high doses of spinal cord stimulation to individuals with PSPS-T1/2 may induce supraspinal descending activation. Similarly, exercise is recognized as a fundamental aspect of spinal pain management. Studies have demonstrated its impact on neurophysiological factors, including the release of spinal and supraspinal beta-endorphins, which activate μ-opioid receptors. Therefore, the purpose of this study will be to examine the effect of SCS in combination with lumbo-pelvic stability core training on perceived low back pain, quality of life and disability in failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) patients. Methods/Materials. A double-blind randomized clinical trial (RCT) has been designed. All participants will be randomized from a pre-set sequence. The intervention design has been elaborated from the CONSORT guidelines. This study protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee in research of Salamanca Health Area (protocol number PI 2023 101435 in (24/01/2024) in accordance with the ethical guidelines of the Helsinki declaration. Sample size was calculated using G Power® Sample size software (University of Düsseldorf). The calculation was based on a moderate effect size of 0.4 (partial η2 = 0.40, α = .05, power = 0.90), resulting in a total of 28 patients. Assuming a 30% dropout rate, 36 participants will be recruited in total. Two sessions per week will be scheduled for 8 weeks with a total of 16 sessions. Each work session will have a duration of 60 minutes. The exercise will be adapted according to the phases based on the results already published, limiting in each phase the degrees of flexion and extension of the spine in order to avoid the risk of electrode migration. Primary outcomes will be functionality, satisfaction, strength, psychosocial variables, quality of life and pain perception.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 22, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 9, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2026
CompletedAugust 28, 2024
August 1, 2024
1.7 years
February 15, 2024
August 26, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Disability (Oswestry Disability Index)
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is the most used and validated assessment test for lumbar pain. Is a self-assessment test divided in ten sections designed to assess the limitations in daily life
at baseline, Post3weeks, Post2months, Post6months
Perception Pain (Visual analogue scale)
This scale is an efficient tool to quantify in a subjective and selective way this range in which 0 is considered a total absence of pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable
at baseline, Post3weeks, Post2months, Post6months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Quality of life (Short Form 36 Health Survey, SF36)
at baseline, Post3weeks, Post2months, Post6months
Patient's satisfaction
at baseline, Post3weeks, Post2months, Post6months
Strength (Sorensen Test)
at baseline, Post3weeks, Post2months, Post6months
Fear of Movement (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, TSK)
at baseline, Post3weeks, Post2months, Post6months
Individual's belief in their own ability to successfully execute tasks (Self-efficacy Scale)
at baseline, Post3weeks, Post2months, Post6months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Spinal Cord Stimulation
ACTIVE COMPARATORSpinal cord stimulation (SCS) involves an implantable pulse generator with the potential for enhanced therapeutic success through stimulation algorithms and parameters (28). Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) targeting distal areas, such as the dorsal root ganglion, may offer greater anatomical specificity in therapy. Subthreshold stimulation, utilizing high-frequency or burst energy delivery, has the potential to eliminate noxious and off-target paresthesiae. Recent studies have demonstrated that subthreshold stimulation at high frequencies and/or utilizing different stimulation paradigms can provide equal or even superior pain relief compared to standard SCS (29). The procedure entails the placement of two octapolar electrodes inserted through the epidural space, positioned beneath the dorsal area posterior to the spinal cord's posterior horn.
Spinal Cord Stimulation+Exercise
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental group will perform a Lumbo-pelvic core stability training program combined with motor control exercises through specific therapeutic exercises of the lumbopelvic centre combined with neurostimulation treatment. The exercise will be adapted according to the phases based on the results already published, the following intervention plan has been designed. Additionally, in each of the phases, the exercises were designed, limiting the degree of flexion/extension and lumbar traction of the exercises. Two weekly sessions will be scheduled during 8 weeks with a total of 24 sessions, each one of 60 minutes of duration. A certified physiotherapist in exercised with at least 10 years of clinical practice has applied treatment.
Interventions
The exercise The exercise will be adapted according to the phases based on the results already published, limiting in each phase the degrees of flexion and extension of the spine in order to avoid the risk of electrode migration.
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) involves an implantable pulse generator with the potential for enhanced therapeutic success through stimulation algorithms and parameters (28). Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) targeting distal areas, such as the dorsal root ganglion, may offer greater anatomical specificity in therapy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Have a diagnostic of PSPS-T1/2 with leg pain and back pain,
- Patients older than 18 years
- months with pain
- Visual Analogue Scale score \>7
- Spanish native language
You may not qualify if:
- Previous surgeries in abdominal area
- Pregnant or lactating
- Severe fractures or pathologies
- Spine structural deformity
- Neurologic or psychiatric issues.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Juan Vicente-Mampel
Torrent, Valencia, 46900, Spain
Related Publications (5)
Othman R, Dassanayake S, Jayakaran P, Tumilty S, Swain N, Mani R. Relationships Between Psychological, Social, Physical Activity, and Sleep Measures and Somatosensory Function in Individuals With Spinal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin J Pain. 2020 Feb;36(2):124-134. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000775.
PMID: 31764166BACKGROUNDBaber Z, Erdek MA. Failed back surgery syndrome: current perspectives. J Pain Res. 2016 Nov 7;9:979-987. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S92776. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27853391BACKGROUNDChristelis N, Simpson B, Russo M, Stanton-Hicks M, Barolat G, Thomson S, Schug S, Baron R, Buchser E, Carr DB, Deer TR, Dones I, Eldabe S, Gallagher R, Huygen F, Kloth D, Levy R, North R, Perruchoud C, Petersen E, Rigoard P, Slavin K, Turk D, Wetzel T, Loeser J. Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome: A Proposal for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome and ICD-11. Pain Med. 2021 Apr 20;22(4):807-818. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab015.
PMID: 33779730BACKGROUNDNijs J, Meeus M, Cagnie B, Roussel NA, Dolphens M, Van Oosterwijck J, Danneels L. A modern neuroscience approach to chronic spinal pain: combining pain neuroscience education with cognition-targeted motor control training. Phys Ther. 2014 May;94(5):730-8. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130258. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
PMID: 24481595BACKGROUNDCho JH, Lee JH, Song KS, Hong JY. Neuropathic Pain after Spinal Surgery. Asian Spine J. 2017 Aug;11(4):642-652. doi: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.4.642. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
PMID: 28874984BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Francisco J Sanchez Montero
Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca. Unidad del Dolor
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Juan Vicente-Mampel
Catholic University of Valencia
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- By doing so, we will aim to eliminate or reduce potential biases due to the order of patients and any transference effects that might occur if one profile clinical patients will influence the performance in several evaluations. Specifically, each patient will complete a sequence of allocation in the order of A, B, B, A, where 'A' represents SCS treatment isolated and 'B' denotes combined treatment. Subsequently, the average of the two 'A' conditions was calculated, and the same process was applied for the 'B' conditions
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 15, 2024
First Posted
February 22, 2024
Study Start
April 9, 2024
Primary Completion
January 1, 2026
Study Completion
January 1, 2026
Last Updated
August 28, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share