NCT06272344

Brief Summary

Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs) such as pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators need to be regularly and systematically interrogated and reprogrammed to ensure proper functioning. While remote monitoring allows for partial interrogation at a remote location, full CIED check-up and reprogramming is only possible when the patient visits a cardiologist capable of performing device programming. This can be challenging for patients and may cause unnecessary delays, particularly in settings of limited resources, enforced physical distancing, and quarantines. The aim of this study is to evaluate our previously validated remote programming solution (REACT study, NCT05366660) in outpatient device clinics which are close to the patient's home but remote from the CIED expert.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
36

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 24, 2023

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 15, 2024

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 22, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 2, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 2, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

June 17, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

February 15, 2024

Last Update Submit

June 12, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Implantable cardioverter defibrillatorICDTelemedecineRemote monitoringRemote programmingCardiac implantable electronical deviceMedically underserved populationMedically underserved areaHealth professional shortage area

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • assess the satisfaction of patients benefiting from a teleconsultation compared to a standard consultation at hospital

    Patient satisfaction

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Time saving for patient

    6 months

  • Savings on medical transport

    6 months

  • Costs associated with teleconsultation

    6 months

  • safety of teleconsultation

    6 months

Study Arms (1)

Teleconsultation

EXPERIMENTAL

Teleconsultation at 6 months

Other: Teleconsultation

Interventions

Teleconsultation at 6 months

Teleconsultation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient of both sexes over the age of 18
  • Patients implanted with a cardiac pacemaker or an automatic defibrillator and an indication for device check-up (interrogation ± programming)
  • Patient followed at the Bordeaux University Hospital but living more than 90km away
  • Person beneficiary of social security insurance
  • Women of procreating age with effective contraception

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients younger than 18 years old
  • Patients who are incapable to understand the study design or to give informed consent.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Persons placed under legal protection
  • Subject deprived of liberty on judicial or administrative decision

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Bordeaux University Hospital

Pessac, France, 33604, France

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Ploux S, Strik M, Varma N, Bouteiller XP, Carlier L, Lissandreau S, Ben Boujema T, Boursier D, Hugot E, Haissaguerre M, Benali K, Bordachar P. Bridging the Gap: Remote Evaluation and Programming of Cardiac Implantable Devices in Medically Underserved Areas. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2025 Jan;11(1):171-178. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.09.027. Epub 2024 Nov 27.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Remote Consultation

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Referral and ConsultationProfessional PracticeOrganization and AdministrationHealth Services AdministrationTelemedicineDelivery of Health CarePatient Care Management

Study Officials

  • Sylvain MD PLOUX

    University Hospital, Bordeaux

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Prospective, single-center, single-arm, pairwise comparison trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2024

First Posted

February 22, 2024

Study Start

April 24, 2023

Primary Completion

April 2, 2024

Study Completion

April 2, 2024

Last Updated

June 17, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations