NCT06269835

Brief Summary

This was a randomized controlled study including 80 infants with cerebral palsy and dysphagia. The Participants were evenly divided into the observation group (with intermittent oro-esophageal tube feeding, n=40) and the control group (with persistent nasogastric tube feeding , n=40). Nutritional status and physical development, condition of dysphagia, and pneumonia before and after 3-month treatment were compared.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 13, 2024

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 21, 2024

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 28, 2024

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

March 6, 2024

Status Verified

March 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

February 13, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 2, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The Oral Motor Assessment Scale

    The Oral Motor Assessment Scale was a reliable and accurate scale. It consists of seven items compromising oral-motor skills. The assessment was conducted with the child in comfortable supported sitting with the head neutral position. The caregiver was allowed to feed the child one of the following foods normally: fed with a spoon soft food as yoghurt, a solid food as cookie or fed a liquid food with a glass, with/without a straw. The assessment primarily focused on feeding with 5 types of food (mash, semi-solids, solids, cracker, and liquid bottle/cup). Throughout the assessment, the examiner didn't interfere with the way the caregiver fed the child but just observed and scored each item of feeding process including chewing, sucking and swallowing. Each item of The Oral Motor Assessment Scale takes 30 second to be scored as passive (0), sub-functional (1), semi-functional (2) and functional (3). The final score was positively proportional to swallowing function.

    day 1 and day 90

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Pneumonia

    day 1 and day 90

  • Hemoglobin

    day 1 and day 90

  • Total Protein

    day 1 and day 90

  • Albumin

    day 1 and day 90

  • Prealbumin

    day 1 and day 90

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

The observation group

EXPERIMENTAL

All participants were given routine rehabilitation treatment by professional rehabilitation therapists, including exercise therapy, guided education, psychological therapy, acupuncture and massage therapy, to promote the development of motor and cognitive function, as well as to improve intellectual development. Besides, swallowing function training was also provided, including direct training, indirect training, and compensatory training.Within 4 hours of admission, the observation group were required to undergo nasogastric tube removal and initiated Intermittent Oro-Esophageal Tube Feeding for nutrition support.

Behavioral: systemic therapyDevice: Intermittent Oro-Esophageal Tube Feeding

The control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

All participants were given routine rehabilitation treatment by professional rehabilitation therapists, including exercise therapy, guided education, psychological therapy, acupuncture and massage therapy, to promote the development of motor and cognitive function, as well as to improve intellectual development. Besides, swallowing function training was also provided, including direct training, indirect training, and compensatory training.The control group was given nutrition support with persistent nasogastric tube feeding , of which the tube passed through the nasal cavity into the stomach.

Behavioral: systemic therapyDevice: Persistent Nasogastric Tube Feeding

Interventions

All participants were given routine rehabilitation treatment by professional rehabilitation therapists, including exercise therapy, guided education, psychological therapy, acupuncture and massage therapy, to promote the development of motor and cognitive function, as well as to improve intellectual development\[. Besides, swallowing function training was also provided, including direct training, indirect training, and compensatory training, as follows The mendelson maneuver: performed 5 days per week, twice per day, 5-10 minutes each time. Cold stimulation of the pharynx: performed every day, twice per day, 3-5 minutes each time. Passive head extension: to stretch the submental muscle for 2-3 seconds, with upward resistance applied to the lower cheek for no less than 5 times a day and no less than 5 minutes each time. Direct feeding training: with powdered milk, once a day, 5 days a week.

The control groupThe observation group

Within 4 hours of admission, the observation group were required to undergo nasogastric tube removal and initiated Intermittent Oro-Esophageal Tube Feeding for nutrition support. Before each feeding, the infant should rest for approximately 1 hour and undergo oral clean. During feeding, the infant should be held by the caregiver in a semi-reclined or upright position. Firstly, the tail of the tube was inserted via mouth into the upper part of the esophagus with a depth of 18-20cm, and the external part of the tube should be placed in water with the absence of bubbles indicating the successful tube placement. Subsequently, 1ml of water was slowly injected, followed by liquid food or water at a rate of approximately 50ml/min through a syringe connected to the feeding tube. After feeding, the tube should be slowly removed, and the feeding position should be maintained for 30-60 minutes to prevent reflux.

The observation group

The control group was given nutrition support with Persistent Nasogastric Tube Feeding, of which the tube passed through the nasal cavity into the stomach. After successful intubation, the tube was secured on the cheek. Liquid food was then syringe-fed into the stomach and the feeding was conducted every 2-3 hours, with each meal not exceeding 200 ml. The daily intake was generally consistent with that of the observation group. Besides, after successful intubation, the tube was secured on the infant's face and changed every one to two weeks.

The control group

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Months - 12 Months
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • meeting the diagnostic criteria of cerebral palsy formulated by the 13th National Conference on Pediatric Cerebral Palsy Rehabilitation;
  • age\<1 year;
  • diagnosed as dysphagia confirmed by Dysphagia Disorder Survey or pediatric esophagoscopy;
  • with a nasogastric tube inserted at admission;
  • enteral nutrition support is required and feasible.

You may not qualify if:

  • with dysphagia caused by other diseases or factors;
  • with progressive neurological disease or degenerative neurological disease;
  • with severe heart disease, liver or kidney dysfunction, hematological disorders, or other acute and severe symptoms;
  • with abnormalities in the oral cavity, pharynx, esophagus, or other parts of the digestive tract;
  • with poor compliance.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Center Rehabilitation Hospital

Seoul, South Korea

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Palsy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain Damage, ChronicBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Nieto Luis, Master

    Site Coordinator of United Medical Group

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Qianyun Lu, Master

CONTACT

Weiji Zhao, Master

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Head of R&D

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2024

First Posted

February 21, 2024

Study Start

February 28, 2024

Primary Completion

December 1, 2024

Study Completion

December 1, 2024

Last Updated

March 6, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations