CBCT vs OPT on the Oral Health Status at 12 Months of Patients Hospitalized for Infective Endocarditis.
3D STARS
3D Imaging (Cone Beam Computed Tomography) Versus Orthopantomogram on the Oral Health Status at 12 Months of Patients Hospitalized for Infective Endocarditis: a Multicenter Randomized Superiority Controlled Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
170
1 country
10
Brief Summary
1\. Infective Endocarditis (IE) is a rare and serious disease with high morbidity and mortality; 2. Streptoccoci of oral origin are the second more frequent microorganisms responsible for IE; 3. Oral Infectious Foci (OIF) are underdetected using the current recommended clinical examination/Orthopantomogram (OPT) approach; 4. Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) has a better sensitivity and sensibility to detect OIF than OPT; 5. To date, no study has been performed to assess the potential benefit of a clinical examination/CBCT approach on the oral health status in IE patients. Thus, conducting a randomized controlled trial is highly desirable to assess the potential impact of a clinical examination/CBCT approach on the oral health status of patients hospitalized for IE and potentially to reduce IE new episodes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 5, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 21, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 18, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 18, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 18, 2028
September 17, 2025
December 1, 2024
3.6 years
February 5, 2024
September 11, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Superiority of CBCT
Number of oral infectious foci detected using orthopantomogram versus Cone Beam Computer Tomography
Month 12
Superiority of CBCT
DFMT index comprising the number of decayed, filled and missing teeth
Month 12
Superiority of CBCT
Number of severe periodontitis sites
Month 12
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Diagnostic at inclusion
Day 0
Incident symptomatic OIF
Month 12
Incident asymptomatic OIF
Month 12
Oral hygiene
Day 0 and Month 12
Follow-up habits
Day 0 and Month 12
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
OPT
NO INTERVENTIONOrthopantomogram = current recommended clinical examination approach (comparator procedure)
CBCT
EXPERIMENTALCone Beam Computed Tomography = experimental clinical examination approach (procedure under evaluation)
Interventions
Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) has a better sensitivity and sensibility to detect OIF.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients hospitalized or recently hospitalized for definite IE according to the 2015 ESC classification, naive patients for dental examination and imaging, whatever the IE responsible microorganism;
- Patients with a stable clinical state, meaning stabilized IE patients out of the critical phase, compatible with the performance of an OPT and a CBCT;
- Patients whose life expectancy is expected to be longer than 6 months;
- Patients who agree to visit the dental department of the hospital to carry out OIF eradication or at his/her personal dentist;
- Patients over 18 years old;
- Patients affiliated to a Social Security or a health insurance scheme;
- Patients who have given informed consent to participate to the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Medical contraindications to perform OPT or CBCT imaging;
- Absence of microbiologic identification of the IE responsible microorganism;
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women;
- Patients unable to give informed consent to participate to the study (under trusteeship, guardianship and legal protection).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (10)
CHU Bordeaux - Site Pellegrin
Bordeaux, France
CHU Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, France
CHU Grenoble
Grenoble, France
HCL
Lyon, France
APHM
Marseille, France
CHRU Nancy
Nancy, France
CHU Nantes
Nantes, France
AP-HP - Site Bretonneau
Paris, France
CHU Toulouse
Toulouse, France
CHRU Tours
Tours, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 5, 2024
First Posted
February 21, 2024
Study Start
December 18, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 18, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 18, 2028
Last Updated
September 17, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share