Kinesiological / Dietary Supplement Intervention in Knee Osteoarthritis
KDSKOA
Effectiveness of Kinesiological and Dietary Supplement Intervention in Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis
1 other identifier
interventional
93
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the effectiveness of dietary supplement combined with exercise in managing knee osteoarthritis (KOA). The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Is adding a dietary supplement to exercise additionally effective in managing KOA?
- Is adding exercise to the dietary supplement additionally effective in managing KOA? Participants will be given in three groups:
- Real dietary supplement alone
- Real dietary supplement with exercise
- Placebo dietary supplement with exercise
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 13, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 21, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 11, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2026
February 23, 2026
February 1, 2026
2.2 years
February 13, 2024
February 19, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (15)
Change from baseline in self-assessment pain, stiffness, and physical function (WOMAC questionaire) at week 12 and at a 6-week follow-up
WOMAC is a self-assessment questionnaire consisting of 24 questions, addressing pain, stiffness, and physical function in individuals with knee or hip osteoarthritis. A higher achieved value or sum of points (0-96) indicates a worse condition.
Baseline, week 12 and at a 6-week follow-up
Change from baseline in self-assessment quality of life (SF-36 questionaire) at week 12
SF-36 is a self-assessment questionnaire on quality of life consisting of 36 items, which are grouped into domains measuring eight health components: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, role limitations due to emotional health, vitality, mental health, social functioning, bodily pain, and general health. Each item is scored, and each health component provides a score ranging from 0 to 100, where a score of 0 indicates very poor health, while a score of 100 indicates excellent health.
Baseline and week 12
Change from baseline in knee pain on numeric rating scale at week 12
Numeric rating scale (NRS) measures pain intensity. It is subjectively assess the current level of knee pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Change = week 12 score - baseline score
Baseline and week 12
Change from baseline in 40 metre fast-paced walk at week 12 and at a 6-week follow-up
A timed walk of 4 x 10 metres for a total of 40 metres
Baseline, week 12 and at a 6-week follow-up
Change from baseline in static balance time at week 12
A piezoelectric force plate (Kistler, Winterthur, Switzerland, model 9260AA) for a measure forces on the surface, allowing us to record the movement of the center of pressure on the surface over time. The position is a single-leg stance, with the test conducted with eyes open, and parallel stance with the test conducted with eyes open and eyes closed, with three 30-second repetitions in each position. In evaluating the quality of static balance performance, investigators will calculate time of single-leg stance and parallel stance.
Baseline and week 12
Change from baseline in direction-specific amplitude from the center of pressure in static balance at week 12
The position is a single-leg stance and parallel stance on piezoelectric force plate (Kistler, Winterthur, Switzerland, model 9260AA) for a measure forces on the surface, with the test conducted with eyes open and eyes closed, with three 30-second repetitions in each position. In evaluating the quality of static balance performance, investigators will calculate overall and direction-specific amplitude from the center of pressure on the surface.
Baseline and week 12
Change from baseline in direction-specific velocity from the center of pressure in static balance at week 12
The position is a single-leg stance and parallel stance on piezoelectric force plate (Kistler, Winterthur, Switzerland, model 9260AA) for a measure forces on the surface, with the test conducted with eyes open and eyes closed, with three 30-second repetitions in each position. In evaluating the quality of static balance performance, investigators will calculate overall and direction-specific velocity from the center of pressure on the surface.
Baseline and week 12
Change from baseline in direction-specific frequency from the center of pressure in static balance at week 12
The position is a single-leg stance and parallel stance on piezoelectric force plate (Kistler, Winterthur, Switzerland, model 9260AA) for a measure forces on the surface, with the test conducted with eyes open and eyes closed, with three 30-second repetitions in each position. In evaluating the quality of static balance performance, investigators will calculate overall and direction-specific frequency from the center of pressure on the surface.
Baseline and week 12
Change from baseline in number of repetitions in Chair Stand Test at week 12 and at a 6-week follow-up
Chair Stand Test is measure lower body strength, in which participants stand up repeatedly from a chair for 30 seconds with their arms across their chest. Investigators will measure the number of repetitions in one set.
Baseline, 12 week and at a 6-week follow-up
Change from baseline in time for Five Times Sit to Stand Test at week 12
The Five Times Sit to Stand Test scoring is based on the amount of time (to the nearest decimal in seconds) a participant is able to transfer from a seated to a standing position and back to sitting five times with their arms across their chest. Test is used to asses functional lower limbs strength, balance, and fall risk.
Baseline, 12 week and at a 6-week follow-up
Change from baseline in lower body flexibility at week 12
The participant sits on the edge of a chair. One foot must remain flat on the floor, while the other leg is extended forward with the knee straight, heel on the floor, and ankle bent at a 90° angle. One hand is placed on top of the other, with the middle fingers aligned. The participant reaches forward towards the toes by bending at the hips. The back remains straight. The final position is held for 2 seconds. Investigators measure the distance between the fingertips and the toes. Two trials are performed, and the better result is considered.
Baseline and 12 week
Change from baseline in Timed up-and-go test (TUG) at week 12 and at a 6-week follow-up
Timed up-and-go test measures functional mobility and balance. Participants will start seated in a chair with armrests. Upon the investigator's signal, participants will rise from the chair, walk 3 meters forward, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down. The time taken to complete the task will be recorded to the nearest tenth of a second. The test will be performed three times, and the best time will be recorded for analysis.
Baseline, week 12 and at 6-week follow-up
Change from baseline in 10-Step Stair Climb Test (SCT) at week 12 and at a 6-week follow-up
After the practice trial, participants will perform one test trial, during which they will be instructed to ascend and descend a flight of 10 stairs as quickly as possible while maintaining safety. The time taken to complete the task will be recorded to the nearest tenth of a second.
Baseline, week 12 and at 6-week follow-up
Change from baseline in 6-minute walk distance at week 12
6-Minute Walk Test is a sub-maximal exercise test used to assess aerobic capacity and endurance. The distance covered over a time of 6 minutes is used as the outcome.
Baseline and 12 week
Change from baseline in maximal isometric voluntary contraction of knee flexors and extensors at week 12
Maximal isometric voluntary contraction of knee flexion and extension will be performed using a knee dynamometer (S2P, Science in Practice, Ltd., Ljubljana, Slovenia), which will allow knee flexion and extension under static conditions with a knee joint angle of 60° and hip flexion in a seated position at 90°. A support will be placed over the ankle (2-3 cm above the lateral malleolus), through which the participant will press against the measuring part of the device. Before the measurement, the participant will perform two repetitions of flexion and extension with submaximal force, aimed at warming up the participant and familiarizing them with the test requirements. This will be followed by 3 muscle contractions with a 3-second hold at the maximum force produced, during which the participant will be verbally encouraged to achieve maximum strength.
Baseline and week 12
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Change from baseline in presence of inflammatory markers in blood sample at week 12
Baseline and week 12
Change from baseline in 24-hour time use at week 12
Baseline and 12 week
Change from baseline in time spent sleeping, awake/sedentary, and physical activity within 24 hour (DAB-Q) at week 12
Baseline and week 12
Change from baseline in handgrip strength at week 12
Baseline and week 12
Change from baseline in number of repetitions in Arm Curl Test at week 12
Baseline and 12 week
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
The effect of dietary supplements added to physical exercise intervention
OTHERThis study arm will include two groups of participants, one receiving 12 weeks physical exercise intervention together with real dietary supplements (glucosamne and collagen), while the other group receiving exercise intervention with placebo dietary supplements (placebo glucosamine and collagen).
The effect of physical exercise added to dietary supplement intervention
OTHERThis study arm will include two groups of participants, one receiving 12 weeks real dietary supplements alone (glucosamine and collagen), while the other group receiving real dietary supplements (glucosamine and collagen) with physical exercise.
Interventions
One capsule of glucosamine three times daily, and one packet of hydrolyzed collagen.
One capsule of placebo glucosamine three times daily, and one packet containing placebo collagen + physical exercise (60 minutes per session twice a week)
One capsule of glucosamine three times daily, and one packet of hydrolyzed collagen + physical exercise (60 minutes per session twice a week)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- knee osteoarthritis of one or both knee
- severity of knee osteoarthritis based on Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic grade 1-3
- knee pain between 4 and 7 (using a 0-10 scale)
You may not qualify if:
- Age \<55 years
- Kellgren \& Lawrence grade 4 of knee osteoarthritis
- Acute knee injuries within the last 6 months
- Knee pain not associated with knee osteoarthritis
- History of knee or hip endoprosthesis
- Surgery on the back, hip, knee, ankle, or foot within the last 12 months
- Health issues or musculoskeletal limitations affecting strength training and mobility more than knee pain (e.g., lower back pain, hip pain)
- Rheumatoid arthritis, gout
- Neurological conditions (Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, metabolic diseases affecting the nervous system)
- Muscular or joint diseases/injuries affecting lower limb function (e.g., hip and/or ankle osteoarthritis, sprains, fractures)
- Internal medical conditions (cardiovascular, pulmonary, oncological, diabetes with late complications - diabetic foot, neuropathies) affecting physical performance
- Stroke or similar condition with consequences on motor skills and/or cognition (inability to provide consent)
- Balance disorders, known vestibular system impairment
- Body Mass Index \> 32
- Structured strength training exceeding 30 minutes per week
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
University of Primorska, Faculty of Health Sciences
Izola, 6310, Slovenia
Community Healthcare Center dr. Adolf Drolc
Maribor, 2000, Slovenia
Related Publications (2)
Ceh T, Zavrsnik J, Sarabon N. Complementary effect of a combined exercise and dietary supplement intervention in individuals with knee osteoarthritis: study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Trials. 2026 Mar 3. doi: 10.1186/s13063-026-09594-7. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 41772729DERIVEDCeh T, Zavrsnik J, Sarabon N, Prosen M. Experiences and perceptions of a 12-week combined exercise and dietary supplement program for individuals with knee osteoarthritis: a qualitative focus group study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2026 Jan 20;27(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12891-026-09509-2.
PMID: 41559644DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Nejc Šarabon, PhD
University of Primorska, Faculty of Health Sciences
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Placebo blinding / masked for dietary supplement
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Full Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 13, 2024
First Posted
February 21, 2024
Study Start
March 11, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Last Updated
February 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share