A Clinical Study to Compare Functional Outcomes After Surgery Using a Transverse or Longitudinal Surgical Incision in the Skin.
Clinical Study to Compare Functional Results in Patients Affected by Trigger Finger When Surgery is Performed Through a Transverse or Longitudinal Surgical Incision in the Skin.
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Trigger finger is a common pathology in the hand. Patients suffer from pain and depending on which tasks, patients have difficulty to perform them. Its treatment in initial and less serious phases includes conservative measures, but failure of these may require releasing the trigger finger with surgery. The surgical technique performed for trigger finger is the opening of the A1 pulley, the skin incisions used for this surgery are various (transverse, longitudinal, oblique). Trigger finger surgery presents good results in terms of resolution, but complications may also occur. The reason for this study is to assess whether there are functional differences using the Dash scale when we perform a transverse or longitudinal incision in trigger finger surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 31, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 20, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 15, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2025
CompletedAugust 15, 2024
August 1, 2024
9 months
January 31, 2024
August 13, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Functional improvement of the patient after surgery
functional improvement of the patient after surgery, which will be assessed with the Dash scale, 1 being difficult while 5 being unable
Immediately after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Surgeon comfort
Immediately after surgery
Resolution
1, 3 and 6 months
Flushed
1, 3 and 6 months
Pain feeling
1, 3 and 6 months
Contracture
1, 3 and 6 months
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Longitudinal incision
EXPERIMENTALIncision performed longitudinally
Transverse incision
EXPERIMENTALIncision performed transversally
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients over 18 years of age.
- Clinical diagnosis of trigger finger grade II to IV.
- Grade I (pre-trigger) Pain, history of entrapment, but not demonstrable on physical examination, tenderness over the A1 pulley.
- Grade II (active) Demonstrable entrapment, but the patient can actively extend the finger.
- Grade III (passive) Demonstrable entrapment, patient requires passive extension IIIA or inability to actively flex IIIB.
- Grade IV (contracture) Demonstrable entrapment with fixed flexion contracture of the PIP.
You may not qualify if:
- Thumb
- Polydigital
- Allergy to local anesthetics and/or vasoconstrictor agents.
- Previous surgery
- Patients who, in the researcher's opinion, are not good candidates for the study (e.g. inability to comply with the follow-up program, comorbidity, poor physical or mental health in general, drug or alcohol abuse problems...).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Parc taulí
Sabadell, Barcelona, 08208, Spain
Related Publications (3)
Mohd Rashid MZ, Sapuan J, Abdullah S. A randomized controlled trial of trigger finger release under digital anesthesia with (WALANT) and without adrenaline. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019 Jan-Apr;27(1):2309499019833002. doi: 10.1177/2309499019833002.
PMID: 30852960BACKGROUNDKazmers NH, Holt D, Tyser AR, Wang A, Hutchinson DT. A prospective, randomized clinical trial of transverse versus longitudinal incisions for trigger finger release. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2019 Oct;44(8):810-815. doi: 10.1177/1753193419859375. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
PMID: 31272265BACKGROUNDKloeters O, Ulrich DJ, Bloemsma G, van Houdt CI. Comparison of three different incision techniques in A1 pulley release on scar tissue formation and postoperative rehabilitation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 May;136(5):731-7. doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2430-z. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
PMID: 26926477BACKGROUND
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 31, 2024
First Posted
February 20, 2024
Study Start
May 15, 2024
Primary Completion
February 1, 2025
Study Completion
March 1, 2025
Last Updated
August 15, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share