NCT06266052

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of 4 different flap types used during mandibular impacted wisdom teeth surgery on postoperative quality of life, soft tissue and hard tissue healing at the end of the 3rd month.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 15, 2024

Completed
5 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 20, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 20, 2024

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 20, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 20, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

February 20, 2024

Status Verified

February 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

January 15, 2024

Last Update Submit

February 10, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

third molar surgeryflap designfractal analysissoft tissue healing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Eudema Amount

    5 separate length measurements will be made on the face using a flexible ruler. (mm)

    postoperative second and 7.th day

  • Pain Level

    Pain values will be determined with vas scales numbered 0-10.

    postoperative second and 7.th day

  • Trismus Level

    the distance between the incisal edges of the lower and upper teeth during maximum mouth opening will be measured in millimeters with a ruler. (mm)

    postoperative second and 7.th day

  • Halitosis Amount

    It will be evaluated as presence/absence of halitosis. 0/1

    postoperative second and 7.th day

  • bone healing condition

    With the help of a program, the amount of trabeculae in the bone will be counted by the box counting method and a numerical value will be obtained.

    preoperative and postoperative 3th month

Study Arms (4)

Group 1

EXPERIMENTAL

triangular flep design will be use in third molar impacted surgery

Procedure: Triangular Flap

Group 2

EXPERIMENTAL

Berwick flep design will be use in third molar impacted surgery

Procedure: Berwick Flap

Group 3

EXPERIMENTAL

Saurez flep design will be use in third molar impacted surgery

Procedure: Saurez Flap

Group 4

EXPERIMENTAL

Heitz

Procedure: Heitz Flap

Interventions

Triangular flap is a type of flap that is made in the retromolar region, from the distal of the 2nd molar tooth towards the ramus and up to the distal gingival sulcus of the 2nd molar, and includes a vertical releasing incision added from the distobuccal sulcus of the 2nd molar tooth. The auxiliary vertical incision made in this flap type allows the wound to be closed without tension.

Group 1
Berwick FlapPROCEDURE

Berwick described a type of flap whose base is in the distolingual direction of the second molar tooth, in which the tongue-shaped vestibular wing extends to the buccal part of the mandible. In this modification, the incision line is not over the bone defect created by the extraction.

Group 2
Saurez FlapPROCEDURE

In the modified flap type he used, Suarez combined the crestal incision (marginal incision) from the distobuccal corner of the second molar tooth, following the line where the retromolar area meets the buccal bone, with a releasing incision made at the mesial and distal ends of the incision.

Group 3
Heitz FlapPROCEDURE

Heitz used the incision line extending from the distobuccal corner of the 2nd molar tooth to the buccal face of the 2nd molar tooth and downwards, by rotating it towards the angulus mandible on the buccal bone.

Group 4

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged between 18-45
  • Do not have a systemic disease that prevents tissue healing
  • Patients needed impacted third surgery

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregancy
  • Allergic conditions
  • Diabetes
  • Smokers
  • Patients with low oral hygiene

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

RTEU Faculty of Dentistry

Rize, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Soft Tissue Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • zeynep gümrükçü, Dr

    PhD DDS

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2024

First Posted

February 20, 2024

Study Start

January 20, 2024

Primary Completion

March 20, 2024

Study Completion

April 20, 2024

Last Updated

February 20, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

no sharing permission

Locations