NCT06265870

Brief Summary

There are a few guidelines recommend about management of eosinophilia worldwide, most of guielines recommend a thorough history-taking and physical examination. Subsequently, investigations are requested based on suspected causes. In cases where parasite infection is suspected, particularly in developing countries, stool microscopy and serology are recommended. However, limitations such as low sensitivity of stool microscopy, the inconvenience of collecting multiple stool samples, and the high cost and unavailability of serology may arise. Consequently, some physicians opt for empiric anthelminthic regimens in managing eosinophilic patients, even without stool tests or if stool test results are normal. If subsequent complete blood count (CBC) results show a recovery of absolute eosinophil count, it is assumed that eosinophilia was caused by a parasite infection. While some studies demonstrate the efficacy and simplicity of this approach, there is a risk of overestimating parasite infection in eosinophilic patients, potential adverse drug reactions from unnecessary anthelminthic treatment, and the possibility of drug resistance due to inappropriate dosing. To address this gap, no study has yet compared the efficacy between specific anthelminthic treatment based on test results and empirical anthelminthic treatment in eosinophilic patients. Therefore, the investigators are conducting this study.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
700

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 10, 2024

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 20, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2024

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

September 24, 2024

Status Verified

September 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

February 10, 2024

Last Update Submit

September 22, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

eosinophiliaanthelminthic drugsempirical treatmentstool examination

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Eosinophilia recovery

    Recovery from eosinophilia was defined as an absolute eosinophil count of less than 500 cells per microliter, as measured from the complete blood count (CBC) four weeks after receiving anthelminthic treatment.

    From receive anthelminthic treatment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in AEC

    From receive anthelminthic treatment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Specific anthelminthic

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants were asked to provide stool samples for three consecutive days for testing through microscopy, culture, and PCR to detect parasites. * This study will combine wet smear and Kato's thick smear methods, with duplicate samples collected from each stool specimen to maximize parasite detection. To ensure reliability, two experienced microscopists will independently examine all four slides, and an independent report generated. In cases of discrepant results, a third microscopist will arbitrate, and the final diagnosis determined by majority vote. * Stool culture will look for Strongyloides stercoralis and hookworm larvae. * Stool PCR: Targeted gene of 7 helminths will be amplified and detected by multiplex real-time PCR. The reaction will be dividing into three assays. Following the analysis of the stool samples, participants will receive specific anthelminthic treatment tailored to the results of the stool tests.

Drug: Ivermectin or albendazole

Empirical anthelminthic

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants will receive an empirical anthelminthic regimen consisting of albendazole 400 mg twice a day for seven consecutive days. Following this treatment, a follow-up complete blood count (CBC) will be requested to assess responsiveness.

Drug: Albendazole

Interventions

Participants receive empiric anthelminthic treatment which is albendazole 400 mg twice a day for seven consecutive days

Empirical anthelminthic

Participants will receive specific anthelminthic treatment tailored to the results of the stool tests

Specific anthelminthic

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants who come for check-ups at general practitioner, primary care unit, and Srivejchavat Premium Center have an absolute eosinophil count greater than 500 cells/microliter with a white blood cell count less than 10,000 cells/microliter.
  • Age at least 18 years old
  • Consent to participate in research

You may not qualify if:

  • Having any characteristics that need urgent care 1.1 Having history of unintended significant weight loss is defined as the loss of body weight exceeding 10% within a span of six months without deliberate attention.
  • Physical examination revealed a body temperature equal to or greater than 37.8 degrees Celsius, lymphadenopathy or hepatosplenomegaly.
  • CBC revealed blast cell
  • Receiving anthelminthic drug within 6 months
  • Underlying cancer (active stage), HIV, HBV, HCV, collagen vascular disease, active TB
  • Allergy to albendazole, ivermectin, or metronidazole
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Serum transaminase higher than 2 times of upper normal limit
  • Taking medications that may induce eosinophilia within the past three months, such as herbal supplements, NSAIDs, Salicylic acid, Carbamazepine, Colchicine, Nitrofurantoin, Dapsone, or Minocycline, was reported.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Prince of Songkla University - Hat Yai Campus: Prince of Songkla University

Hat Yai, Changwat Songkhla, 90110, Thailand

RECRUITING

Related Publications (18)

  • Chanswangphuwana C, Uaprasert N, Moonla C, Rojnuckarin P. Causes and outcomes of hypereosinophilia in a tropical country. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2024 Dec;42(4):403-408. doi: 10.12932/AP-221220-1021.

  • Ananchaisarp T, Chamroonkiadtikun P, Julamanee J, Perdvong K, Chimpalee T, Rattanavirakul N, Leelarujijaroen N, Hathaipitak T, Tantinam T. Prevalence and management of eosinophilia based on periodic health examinations in primary care clinics. Asian Biomed (Res Rev News). 2023 Jun 16;16(5):273-282. doi: 10.2478/abm-2022-0030. eCollection 2022 Oct.

  • Shomali W, Gotlib J. World Health Organization-defined eosinophilic disorders: 2022 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 2022 Jan 1;97(1):129-148. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26352. Epub 2021 Oct 8.

  • Butt NM, Lambert J, Ali S, Beer PA, Cross NC, Duncombe A, Ewing J, Harrison CN, Knapper S, McLornan D, Mead AJ, Radia D, Bain BJ; British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Guideline for the investigation and management of eosinophilia. Br J Haematol. 2017 Feb;176(4):553-572. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14488. Epub 2017 Jan 23. No abstract available.

  • Magnaval JF, Laurent G, Gaudre N, Fillaux J, Berry A. A diagnostic protocol designed for determining allergic causes in patients with blood eosinophilia. Mil Med Res. 2017 May 23;4:15. doi: 10.1186/s40779-017-0124-7. eCollection 2017.

  • Vaisben E, Brand R, Kadakh A, Nassar F. The role of empirical albendazole treatment in idiopathic hypereosinophilia - a case series. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2015 Nov-Dec;26(6):323-4. doi: 10.1155/2015/531675.

  • Insiripong S, Siriyakorn N. Treatment of eosinophilia with albendazole. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2008 May;39(3):517-20.

  • Chen B, Fu Y, Wang Z, Rong Q, Zhang Q, Xie J, Kong X, Jiang M. Eosinophilia attention, diagnosis, treatment, and awareness in physicians: a cross-sectional survey. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2023 Jan 24;14:20406223221146938. doi: 10.1177/20406223221146938. eCollection 2023.

  • Kim DW, Shin MG, Yun HK, Kim SH, Shin JH, Suh SP, Ryang DW. [Incidence and causes of hypereosinophilia (corrected) in the patients of a university hospital]. Korean J Lab Med. 2009 Jun;29(3):185-93. doi: 10.3343/kjlm.2009.29.3.185. Korean.

  • Wardlaw AJ, Wharin S, Aung H, Shaffu S, Siddiqui S. The causes of a peripheral blood eosinophilia in a secondary care setting. Clin Exp Allergy. 2021 Jul;51(7):902-914. doi: 10.1111/cea.13889. Epub 2021 Jun 3.

  • Tefferi A, Patnaik MM, Pardanani A. Eosinophilia: secondary, clonal and idiopathic. Br J Haematol. 2006 Jun;133(5):468-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2006.06038.x.

  • Guo C, Bochner BS. Workup for eosinophilia. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2019 Nov 1;40(6):429-432. doi: 10.2500/aap.2019.40.4264.

  • Kuang FL. Approach to Patients with Eosinophilia. Med Clin North Am. 2020 Jan;104(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2019.08.005.

  • Rosenwasser LJ. Approach to patients with eosinophilia. Mo Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;108(5):358-60.

  • Simon D, Simon HU. Eosinophilic disorders. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Jun;119(6):1291-300; quiz 1301-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.02.010. Epub 2007 Apr 2.

  • Carranza-Rodriguez C, Escamilla-Gonzalez M, Fuentes-Corripio I, Perteguer-Prieto MJ, Garate-Ormaechea T, Perez-Arellano JL. Helminthosis and eosinophilia in Spain (1990-2015). Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2018 Feb;36(2):120-136. doi: 10.1016/j.eimc.2015.11.019. Epub 2016 Jan 27. English, Spanish.

  • Khoury P, Bochner BS. Consultation for Elevated Blood Eosinophils: Clinical Presentations, High Value Diagnostic Tests, and Treatment Options. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Sep-Oct;6(5):1446-1453. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.04.030.

  • Khanna V, Tilak K, Mukhopadhyay C, Khanna R. Significance of Diagnosing Parasitic Infestation in Evaluation of Unexplained Eosinophilia. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Jul;9(7):DC22-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12222.6259. Epub 2015 Jul 1.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Eosinophilia

Interventions

AlbendazoleIvermectin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Leukocyte DisordersHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CarbamatesAcids, AcyclicCarboxylic AcidsOrganic ChemicalsBenzimidazolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsMacrolidesPolyketidesLactones

Study Officials

  • Thareerat Ananchaisarp

    Prince of Songkla University - Hat Yai Campus: Prince of Songkla University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Thareerat Ananchaisarp

CONTACT

Wisarut Srisintorn

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2024

First Posted

February 20, 2024

Study Start

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion

December 31, 2025

Study Completion

December 31, 2025

Last Updated

September 24, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-09

Locations