Specific Versus Empirical Anthelminthic Treatment in Eosinophilia
Eosinophilia
Comparison of Outcome Between Specific Anthelminthic Treatment According to Test Results and Empirical Anthelminthic Treatment in Eosinophilic Patient
1 other identifier
interventional
700
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There are a few guidelines recommend about management of eosinophilia worldwide, most of guielines recommend a thorough history-taking and physical examination. Subsequently, investigations are requested based on suspected causes. In cases where parasite infection is suspected, particularly in developing countries, stool microscopy and serology are recommended. However, limitations such as low sensitivity of stool microscopy, the inconvenience of collecting multiple stool samples, and the high cost and unavailability of serology may arise. Consequently, some physicians opt for empiric anthelminthic regimens in managing eosinophilic patients, even without stool tests or if stool test results are normal. If subsequent complete blood count (CBC) results show a recovery of absolute eosinophil count, it is assumed that eosinophilia was caused by a parasite infection. While some studies demonstrate the efficacy and simplicity of this approach, there is a risk of overestimating parasite infection in eosinophilic patients, potential adverse drug reactions from unnecessary anthelminthic treatment, and the possibility of drug resistance due to inappropriate dosing. To address this gap, no study has yet compared the efficacy between specific anthelminthic treatment based on test results and empirical anthelminthic treatment in eosinophilic patients. Therefore, the investigators are conducting this study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 10, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 20, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedSeptember 24, 2024
September 1, 2024
1.7 years
February 10, 2024
September 22, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Eosinophilia recovery
Recovery from eosinophilia was defined as an absolute eosinophil count of less than 500 cells per microliter, as measured from the complete blood count (CBC) four weeks after receiving anthelminthic treatment.
From receive anthelminthic treatment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in AEC
From receive anthelminthic treatment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Specific anthelminthic
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants were asked to provide stool samples for three consecutive days for testing through microscopy, culture, and PCR to detect parasites. * This study will combine wet smear and Kato's thick smear methods, with duplicate samples collected from each stool specimen to maximize parasite detection. To ensure reliability, two experienced microscopists will independently examine all four slides, and an independent report generated. In cases of discrepant results, a third microscopist will arbitrate, and the final diagnosis determined by majority vote. * Stool culture will look for Strongyloides stercoralis and hookworm larvae. * Stool PCR: Targeted gene of 7 helminths will be amplified and detected by multiplex real-time PCR. The reaction will be dividing into three assays. Following the analysis of the stool samples, participants will receive specific anthelminthic treatment tailored to the results of the stool tests.
Empirical anthelminthic
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants will receive an empirical anthelminthic regimen consisting of albendazole 400 mg twice a day for seven consecutive days. Following this treatment, a follow-up complete blood count (CBC) will be requested to assess responsiveness.
Interventions
Participants receive empiric anthelminthic treatment which is albendazole 400 mg twice a day for seven consecutive days
Participants will receive specific anthelminthic treatment tailored to the results of the stool tests
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants who come for check-ups at general practitioner, primary care unit, and Srivejchavat Premium Center have an absolute eosinophil count greater than 500 cells/microliter with a white blood cell count less than 10,000 cells/microliter.
- Age at least 18 years old
- Consent to participate in research
You may not qualify if:
- Having any characteristics that need urgent care 1.1 Having history of unintended significant weight loss is defined as the loss of body weight exceeding 10% within a span of six months without deliberate attention.
- Physical examination revealed a body temperature equal to or greater than 37.8 degrees Celsius, lymphadenopathy or hepatosplenomegaly.
- CBC revealed blast cell
- Receiving anthelminthic drug within 6 months
- Underlying cancer (active stage), HIV, HBV, HCV, collagen vascular disease, active TB
- Allergy to albendazole, ivermectin, or metronidazole
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Serum transaminase higher than 2 times of upper normal limit
- Taking medications that may induce eosinophilia within the past three months, such as herbal supplements, NSAIDs, Salicylic acid, Carbamazepine, Colchicine, Nitrofurantoin, Dapsone, or Minocycline, was reported.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Prince of Songkla University - Hat Yai Campus: Prince of Songkla University
Hat Yai, Changwat Songkhla, 90110, Thailand
Related Publications (18)
Chanswangphuwana C, Uaprasert N, Moonla C, Rojnuckarin P. Causes and outcomes of hypereosinophilia in a tropical country. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2024 Dec;42(4):403-408. doi: 10.12932/AP-221220-1021.
PMID: 33865302RESULTAnanchaisarp T, Chamroonkiadtikun P, Julamanee J, Perdvong K, Chimpalee T, Rattanavirakul N, Leelarujijaroen N, Hathaipitak T, Tantinam T. Prevalence and management of eosinophilia based on periodic health examinations in primary care clinics. Asian Biomed (Res Rev News). 2023 Jun 16;16(5):273-282. doi: 10.2478/abm-2022-0030. eCollection 2022 Oct.
PMID: 37551315RESULTShomali W, Gotlib J. World Health Organization-defined eosinophilic disorders: 2022 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 2022 Jan 1;97(1):129-148. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26352. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
PMID: 34533850RESULTButt NM, Lambert J, Ali S, Beer PA, Cross NC, Duncombe A, Ewing J, Harrison CN, Knapper S, McLornan D, Mead AJ, Radia D, Bain BJ; British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Guideline for the investigation and management of eosinophilia. Br J Haematol. 2017 Feb;176(4):553-572. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14488. Epub 2017 Jan 23. No abstract available.
PMID: 28112388RESULTMagnaval JF, Laurent G, Gaudre N, Fillaux J, Berry A. A diagnostic protocol designed for determining allergic causes in patients with blood eosinophilia. Mil Med Res. 2017 May 23;4:15. doi: 10.1186/s40779-017-0124-7. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28546866RESULTVaisben E, Brand R, Kadakh A, Nassar F. The role of empirical albendazole treatment in idiopathic hypereosinophilia - a case series. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2015 Nov-Dec;26(6):323-4. doi: 10.1155/2015/531675.
PMID: 26744590RESULTInsiripong S, Siriyakorn N. Treatment of eosinophilia with albendazole. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2008 May;39(3):517-20.
PMID: 18564693RESULTChen B, Fu Y, Wang Z, Rong Q, Zhang Q, Xie J, Kong X, Jiang M. Eosinophilia attention, diagnosis, treatment, and awareness in physicians: a cross-sectional survey. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2023 Jan 24;14:20406223221146938. doi: 10.1177/20406223221146938. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 36712467RESULTKim DW, Shin MG, Yun HK, Kim SH, Shin JH, Suh SP, Ryang DW. [Incidence and causes of hypereosinophilia (corrected) in the patients of a university hospital]. Korean J Lab Med. 2009 Jun;29(3):185-93. doi: 10.3343/kjlm.2009.29.3.185. Korean.
PMID: 19571614RESULTWardlaw AJ, Wharin S, Aung H, Shaffu S, Siddiqui S. The causes of a peripheral blood eosinophilia in a secondary care setting. Clin Exp Allergy. 2021 Jul;51(7):902-914. doi: 10.1111/cea.13889. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
PMID: 34080735RESULTTefferi A, Patnaik MM, Pardanani A. Eosinophilia: secondary, clonal and idiopathic. Br J Haematol. 2006 Jun;133(5):468-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2006.06038.x.
PMID: 16681635RESULTGuo C, Bochner BS. Workup for eosinophilia. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2019 Nov 1;40(6):429-432. doi: 10.2500/aap.2019.40.4264.
PMID: 31690387RESULTKuang FL. Approach to Patients with Eosinophilia. Med Clin North Am. 2020 Jan;104(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2019.08.005.
PMID: 31757229RESULTRosenwasser LJ. Approach to patients with eosinophilia. Mo Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;108(5):358-60.
PMID: 22073495RESULTSimon D, Simon HU. Eosinophilic disorders. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Jun;119(6):1291-300; quiz 1301-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.02.010. Epub 2007 Apr 2.
PMID: 17399779RESULTCarranza-Rodriguez C, Escamilla-Gonzalez M, Fuentes-Corripio I, Perteguer-Prieto MJ, Garate-Ormaechea T, Perez-Arellano JL. Helminthosis and eosinophilia in Spain (1990-2015). Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2018 Feb;36(2):120-136. doi: 10.1016/j.eimc.2015.11.019. Epub 2016 Jan 27. English, Spanish.
PMID: 26827134RESULTKhoury P, Bochner BS. Consultation for Elevated Blood Eosinophils: Clinical Presentations, High Value Diagnostic Tests, and Treatment Options. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Sep-Oct;6(5):1446-1453. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.04.030.
PMID: 30197068RESULTKhanna V, Tilak K, Mukhopadhyay C, Khanna R. Significance of Diagnosing Parasitic Infestation in Evaluation of Unexplained Eosinophilia. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Jul;9(7):DC22-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12222.6259. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
PMID: 26393130RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thareerat Ananchaisarp
Prince of Songkla University - Hat Yai Campus: Prince of Songkla University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 10, 2024
First Posted
February 20, 2024
Study Start
May 1, 2024
Primary Completion
December 31, 2025
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
September 24, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09