NCT06264050

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to verify the influence that participation in a Psychological Support Group has on anxiety, depression and coping skills in patients admitted to the IRCCS San Camillo Hospital. It is therefore an observational study with a pre-post design on a cohort of patients hospitalized at San Camillo IRCCS who attend the Psychological Support Group. The study consists of verifying whether the therapeutic activity of the Psychological Support Group (GSP) has an influence on the levels of anxiety, mood and coping skills in the patients who attend it. These purposes will be pursued through the administration to each patient at the beginning (pre) and at the end (post) of the period of attendance at the GSP, of validated scales: Stay Y2 (anxiety), BDI II(depressive symptoms), COPE NVD 25 (coping strategies) and the CORE-OM (outcomes of psychological activity).

Trial Health

53
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
19

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2004

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 8, 2004

Completed
20.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 8, 2024

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 16, 2024

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 8, 2024

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 15, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

February 16, 2024

Status Verified

February 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

20.7 years

First QC Date

February 8, 2024

Last Update Submit

February 8, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) Y2

    The Stai Y2 instead measures state anxiety (State-anxiety), i.e. a transitory emotional state of an individual in a particular situation, unlike trait anxiety (Trait-anxiety) which reflects a personality variable that stably characterizes the individual and differentiates him from others in the propensity to respond with high levels of anxiety to situations perceived as dangerous. Trait anxiety is measured by the Stai version Y1

    10 minutes

  • The Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II)

    The Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) has 21 items on a 4-point Likert scale (from 0 to 3) and a total score ranging from 0 to 63. Given that the BDI does not diagnose depression but the presence of depressive symptoms, according the manual scores from 0 to 13 indicate normality, from 14 to 19 mild depression, from 20 to 28 moderate depression, from 29 to 63 severe depression.

    15 minutes

  • The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM)

    The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) is a 34-item self-report instrument for measuring outcomes in psychological treatments that has been shown to be reliable, valid, and acceptable in various clinical settings. The items cover four domains: subjective well-being, problems/symptoms, life functioning, and risk. Higher scores in all domains indicate greater psychological problems

    20 minutes

  • The Coping Orientations to Problem Experienced NVI - 25

    The Coping Orientations to Problem Experienced is a self-report questionnaire that takes into consideration different coping methods. The questionnaire asks you to evaluate how often the subject implements that particular coping process in difficult or stressful situations; There are four answer possibilities, from "I usually don't do it" to "I almost always do it". The short version validated in Italian (NVI) has 25 items instead of the 60 of the original version. All elements were grouped into 5 subdimensions, namely: Avoidance strategies, Transcendental orientation, Positive attitude, Social support, Problem orientation.

    15 minutes

Study Arms (1)

Patients in the psychological support group

OTHER

Patients in neurorehabilitation attending a psychological support group

Diagnostic Test: evalutaion scales

Interventions

evalutaion scalesDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

four scales will be administered to whom attend a psychological support group: BDI II (depression); Stai Y2 (trait anxiety); Cope NVI 25 (coping strategies) and Core OM (psychological state)

Patients in the psychological support group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients hospitalized at the IRCCS San Camillo. Patients with indication to attend the Psychological Support Group. Patients who have given valid consent. Patients able to understand and read Italian. Patients with any type of neurological pathology for which they are admitted to neurorehabilitation.
  • Aphasic patients without comprehension deficits and able to communicate effectively with augmented communication media.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients unable to give valid consent. Minor patients or patients over 85 years of age. Patients with participation in the Psychological Support Group of less than three sessions.
  • Patients with cognitive deficits that prevent them from completing the scales and taking the interview.
  • Patients unable to understand and read Italian. Patients with pathologies for which they are not undergoing neurorehabilitation treatment.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (16)

  • Castelnuovo G, Giusti EM, Manzoni GM, Saviola D, Gatti A, Gabrielli S, Lacerenza M, Pietrabissa G, Cattivelli R, Spatola CA, Corti S, Novelli M, Villa V, Cottini A, Lai C, Pagnini F, Castelli L, Tavola M, Torta R, Arreghini M, Zanini L, Brunani A, Capodaglio P, D'Aniello GE, Scarpina F, Brioschi A, Priano L, Mauro A, Riva G, Repetto C, Regalia C, Molinari E, Notaro P, Paolucci S, Sandrini G, Simpson SG, Wiederhold B, Tamburin S. Psychological Treatments and Psychotherapies in the Neurorehabilitation of Pain: Evidences and Recommendations from the Italian Consensus Conference on Pain in Neurorehabilitation. Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 19;7:115. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00115. eCollection 2016.

  • Chiu EC, Chen YJ, Wu WC, Chou CX, Yu MY. Psychometric Comparisons of Three Depression Measures for Patients With Stroke. Am J Occup Ther. 2022 Jul 1;76(4):7604205140. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2022.049347.

  • Denham AMJ, Baker AL, Spratt N, Guillaumier A, Wynne O, Turner A, Magin P, Bonevski B. The unmet needs of informal carers of stroke survivors: a protocol for a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 31;8(1):e019571. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019571.

  • Gregorio GW, Brands I, Stapert S, Verhey FR, van Heugten CM. Assessments of coping after acquired brain injury: a systematic review of instrument conceptualization, feasibility, and psychometric properties. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014 May-Jun;29(3):E30-42. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e31828f93db.

  • Huang SL, Hsieh CL, Wu RM, Lu WS. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of the Beck Depression Inventory and the Taiwan Geriatric Depression Scale in patients with Parkinson's disease. PLoS One. 2017 Sep 25;12(9):e0184823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184823. eCollection 2017.

  • Kampling H, Reese C, Kust J, Mittag O. Systematic development of practice guidelines for psychological interventions in stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Jun;42(11):1616-1622. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1530308. Epub 2019 Jan 7.

  • Liao B, Liang M, Ouyang Q, Song H, Chen X, Su Y. Psychological Nursing of Patients With Stroke in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Dec 11;11:569426. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.569426. eCollection 2020.

  • Palmieri G, Evans C, Hansen V, Brancaleoni G, Ferrari S, Porcelli P, Reitano F, Rigatelli M. Validation of the Italian version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM). Clin Psychol Psychother. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):444-9. doi: 10.1002/cpp.646.

  • Pearce G, Pinnock H, Epiphaniou E, Parke HL, Heavey E, Griffiths CJ, Greenhalgh T, Sheikh A, Taylor SJ. Experiences of Self-Management Support Following a Stroke: A Meta-Review of Qualitative Systematic Reviews. PLoS One. 2015 Dec 14;10(12):e0141803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141803. eCollection 2015.

  • Raciti L, Corallo F, Manuli A, Calabro RS. Nursing, Caregiving and Psychological support in Chronic Disorders of Consciousness: a scoping review. Acta Biomed. 2021 Mar 31;92(S2):e2021013. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS2.11329.

  • Santangelo G, Sacco R, Siciliano M, Bisecco A, Muzzo G, Docimo R, De Stefano M, Bonavita S, Lavorgna L, Tedeschi G, Trojano L, Gallo A. Anxiety in Multiple Sclerosis: psychometric properties of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Acta Neurol Scand. 2016 Dec;134(6):458-466. doi: 10.1111/ane.12564. Epub 2016 Feb 1.

  • Sarkamo T. Cognitive, emotional, and neural benefits of musical leisure activities in aging and neurological rehabilitation: A critical review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Nov;61(6):414-418. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Apr 29.

  • Sihvonen AJ, Sarkamo T, Leo V, Tervaniemi M, Altenmuller E, Soinila S. Music-based interventions in neurological rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2017 Aug;16(8):648-660. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30168-0. Epub 2017 Jun 26.

  • Soratto J, Pires DEP, Friese S. Thematic content analysis using ATLAS.ti software: Potentialities for researchs in health. Rev Bras Enferm. 2020 Apr 22;73(3):e20190250. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0250. eCollection 2020.

  • Starkstein SE, Lischinsky A. The phenomenology of depression after brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation. 2002;17(2):105-13.

  • Wang YP, Gorenstein C. Assessment of depression in medical patients: a systematic review of the utility of the Beck Depression Inventory-II. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013 Sep;68(9):1274-87. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2013(09)15.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Anxiety DisordersConsciousness DisordersNeurologic Manifestations

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Mental DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeurocognitive Disorders

Study Officials

  • Alberto Camuccio, doctor

    IRCCS San Camillo

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: pre post study on a single cohort
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 8, 2024

First Posted

February 16, 2024

Study Start

January 8, 2004

Primary Completion

September 8, 2024

Study Completion

March 15, 2025

Last Updated

February 16, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-02