NCT06262620

Brief Summary

The goal of this prospective, multi-centre, randomised controlled clinical study is to compare the diagnostic yield and safety of the three biopsy techniques (EBUS-TBNA, EBUS-TBMC via a tunnel, and EBUS-TBFB via a tunnel) in mediastinal/hilar lymph node biopsies. Participants will divided into EBUS-TBNA group, EBUS-TBMC via a tunnel group, and EBUS-TBFB via a tunnel group at a 1:1:1 ratio by using central, computerized random sequence, and then undertake EBUS-TBNA, EBUS-TBMC via a tunnel, or EBUS-TBFB according to the group. Researchers will compare the diagnostic yield and incidence of adverse events of the three biopsy techniques.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
552

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 1, 2024

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 16, 2024

Completed
14 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2024

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 18, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 18, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

August 27, 2024

Status Verified

August 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

February 1, 2024

Last Update Submit

August 24, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Dignostic yield of EBUS-TBNA, EBUS-TBMC via a tunnel, and EBUS-TBFB

    The proportion of participants in whom the biopsy led to a definitive diagnosis.

    7 days after the biopsy

  • Incidence rate of adverse events

    Symptoms and signs

    7 days after the biopsy

  • the adequacy of sample acquisition

    Samples resulting in a specific diagnosis or samples with the presence of lymphpcytes were considered as adequate.

    7 days after the biopsy

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • the adequacy of sample acquisition

    7 days after the biopsy

Study Arms (3)

EBUS-transbronchial needle aspiration

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants would undertake EBUS-transbronchial needle aspiration.

Procedure: EBUS-TBNA

EBUS-transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy via a tunnel

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants would undertake EBUS-transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy via a tunnel.

Procedure: EBUS-TBMC via a tunnel

EBUS-transbronchial forceps biopsy via a tunnel

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants would undertake EBUS-transbronchial forceps biopsy via a tunnel.

Procedure: EBUS-TBFB via a tunnel

Interventions

EBUS-TBNAPROCEDURE

A 22G biopsy needle was insert into the lesion through tracheal-bronchial wall under real-time EBUS guided by bronchoscopist. Needle punctures were performed by using the jabbing method. Once it is confirmed that the puncture needle is within the target lesion, the puncture needle is moved back and forth while suction (An empty 50 ml syringe was connected to the port at the end of the puncture needle and aspirated to 20 ml maintained for 20 seconds.) is applied. Each lymph node was operated 5 times.

Also known as: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration.
EBUS-transbronchial needle aspiration

First a tunnel between airway wall and mediastinal and/or hilar lesion was made by a puncture dilation catheter (BroncTruTM AK-91-55, Bronchus Inc. Hangzhou, China). The 1.1mm cryoprobe (Erbe 20402-401, ERBE, Tübingen, Germany) entered the target lymph node through the tunnel under direct monitoring of EBUS, and the distance between the tip of the cryoprobe and the border of target lymph node was measured using EBUS. After confirming that the distance was \>5 mm, the probe was cooled with liquid carbon dioxide for 5-9 seconds. Then retracted with the bronchoscope and the frozen biopsy tissue. Samples were retrieved by thawing in saline and then fixed in formalin. The same lymph node was operated for 3 times.

Also known as: endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy via a tunnel.
EBUS-transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy via a tunnel

Firstly, a tunnel to reach the lymph node is established by making use of a puncture dilation catheter, and a 1.5mm biopsy forceps is pushed into the lymph node through the working channel of the ultrasound bronchoscope. After entering the lymph node, the biopsy forceps were opened proximally to the lymph node, the biopsy forceps were advanced, and then the biopsy forceps were closed distally to the lymph node for each specimen. Each lymph node was operated 5 times.

Also known as: endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial forceps biopsy
EBUS-transbronchial forceps biopsy via a tunnel

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 18 years;
  • At least 1 hilar/mediastinal lesion (short axis ≥ 1 cm) requiring diagnostic bronchoscopy procedure;
  • Patients who can understand the purpose of the trial, participate voluntarily and sign an informed consent form.

You may not qualify if:

  • The lesion is a mediastinal cyst or abscess;
  • Combined severe cardiopulmonary diseases, coagulation disorders, poor tolerance to anaesthesia, combined psychiatric disorders or severe neurosis and other relevant contraindications to bronchoscopy;
  • EBUS assessment reveals that the lesion is rich in blood flow or adjacent to a large vessel, etc. Consider biopsy to be high risk and inappropriate for continuation of biopsy;
  • EBUS did not detect lesions in the hilum and/or mediastinum;
  • Those who, in the judgement of the investigator, have poor patient compliance and are unable to complete the study as required due to mental disorders, etc.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

China-Japan Friendship Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100029, China

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Deng MM, Yang Z, Zhong C, Zheng Z, Tong R, Zhou G, Li X, Zhao L, Herth FJF, Hou G. Comparison of diagnostic yield and safety of three endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy techniques in diagnosing patients with mediastinal/hilar lymphadenopathy: a protocol of multicentre randomised trial in China. BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 23;15(9):e096871. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096871.

Study Officials

  • Gang Hou, MD

    China-Japan Friendship Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Mingming Deng, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2024

First Posted

February 16, 2024

Study Start

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion

February 18, 2026

Study Completion

February 18, 2026

Last Updated

August 27, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-08

Locations