Safety and Efficacy of Fospropofol vs Propofol During Invasive Mechanical Ventilation.
1 other identifier
interventional
200
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the safety and efficacy of fospropofol and propofol during sedation in invasively mechanically ventilated patients in the Anesthesia Intensive Care Unit (AICU). Specific objectives include the following:
- Evaluate the sedative effects of fospropofol and propofol in invasively mechanically ventilated patients. Compare the sedative effects of the two medications using relevant clinical indicators and scoring tools, such as the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS).
- Compare the safety of fospropofol and propofol during sedation. Monitor medication-related adverse reactions, such as respiratory depression, hypotension, arrhythmias, headache, injection site pain, and assess the differences in adverse reaction incidence between the two medications.
- Compare the characteristics of recovery from sedation between PPD and propofol. Focus on the time from sedation to emergence from sedation and compare the differences in recovery time between the two medications. Participants will be sedated with fospropofol or propofol during invasive mechanical ventilation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2024
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 8, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 12, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 15, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 15, 2025
CompletedFebruary 15, 2024
February 1, 2024
11 months
February 8, 2024
February 8, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The patient's Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score and the incidence of adverse reactions
The participant's RASS score was assessed by the caregiver and the occurrence of adverse reactions was recorded. Adverse effects include hypotension, bradycardia, tachycardia, agitation, pain at the injection site, nausea and vomiting, edema, fever, anemia, paresthesias, headache, and hypoxemia.
Admission to the intensive care unit to 2 hours after weaning off the ventilator.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Incidence of adverse reactions during the follow-up period
2 hours after weaning off the ventilator to 24 hours after leaving the intensive care unit.
Extubation time
From admission to the intensive care unit to removal of the endotracheal tube
Study Arms (2)
Fospropofol group
ACTIVE COMPARATORFospropofol is administered to patients after admission to the roomat a pumping rate of 1 mg/kg/h.
Propofol group
PLACEBO COMPARATORPropofol is administered after admission to the room at a pumping rate of 0.5 mg/kg/h.
Interventions
Fospropofol is administered after admission to the room at a pumping rate of 1 mg/kg/h.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18-65 years old
- Intubation and mechanical ventilation \<12h before enrollment
- Expected to require continuous invasive ventilation and sedation less than 6h after admission to anesthesia intensive care unit (AICU).
- Signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- parturient, childbirth or lactating mothers
- acute severe neurological disease or coma
- chronic renal failure
- previous mechanical ventilation \>12h
- severe liver dysfunction (Child-Pugh score C)
- BMI \>30kg/m2 (\>90kg)
- dying
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Jiaqiang Q Zhang, M.D
Henan Provincial People's Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 8, 2024
First Posted
February 15, 2024
Study Start
February 12, 2024
Primary Completion
January 15, 2025
Study Completion
January 15, 2025
Last Updated
February 15, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02