Feasibility and Effectiveness of Lymphedema Education Program After Gynecological Cancer Surgery
Development and Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Lower Extremity Lymphedema Education Program After Gynecological Cancer Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
28
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study aims to examine the effect of lower extremity lymphedema prevention training based on the Symptom Management Model on women undergoing gynecological cancer surgery on lymphedema development, quality of life, and women's self-efficacy. The hypotheses of the study are: H1a: The quality of life of women who underwent gynecological cancer surgery and received lower extremity lymphedema prevention training based on the Symptom Management Model is statistically significantly higher than the quality of life of women in the control group. H1b: The self-efficacy levels of women who underwent gynecological cancer surgery and received lower extremity lymphedema prevention training based on the Symptom Management Model are statistically significantly higher than the self-efficacy levels of women in the control group. H1c: The frequency of experiencing lower extremity lymphedema symptoms of women who underwent gynecological cancer surgery and received lower extremity lymphedema prevention training based on the Symptom Management Model is significantly lower than the frequency of experiencing lower extremity lymphedema symptoms of women in the control group. Participants will be given training on lower extremity lymphedema. At the end of the study, researchers will evaluate the impact of the training on quality of life, self-efficacy, and lymphedema development.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 9, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2024
CompletedFebruary 9, 2024
January 1, 2024
7 months
February 1, 2024
February 1, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Gynecological Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire (GCLQ)- experiences of lymphedema symptoms
The scale questions are answered with a "yes" or "no". GCLQ contains 20 questions that evaluate the presence of symptoms over the past four weeks, scored as 0. If a patient scores 20 points on GCLQ, it indicates the presence of all symptoms, while a score of 0 indicates the absence of all symptoms.
3th month and 6th month
Lower Extremity Circumference Measurement
Circumference measurements will be taken in the supine position, moving from the medial malleolus to the inguinal region at 5 cm intervals for both lower extremities. The difference between both extremities will be recorded in cm. A difference of 2 cm between sides measured from at least 6 points is considered significant.
baseline, 3th and 6th month
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) (C30-VERSION 3.0)
The answers are rated from "not at all" (1 point) to "a lot" (4 points). The last two questions (29th and 30th) are related to the general quality of life and ask the patient to evaluate their health and quality of life in the last week on a scale of 1 to 7 (1 being "very bad" and 7 being "very good"). High scores from these questions indicate high quality of life, while low scores indicate low quality of life.; very bad, 7 points; very good).
baseline, 3th and 6th month
6-Item Self-Efficacy Scale for Chronic Disease Management
The scale consists of six items, with the first four measuring behavioral attitude and the last two measuring psychological attitude. Each item is rated on a 10-point scale ranging from "not at all confident" to "completely confident." To obtain the score, the average of all six items is calculated, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy.
baseline, 3th and 6th month
Study Arms (2)
lymphedema education
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive lymphedema education and educational brochures from the researcher on the 2nd day after gynecological cancer surgery.
routine discharge education
NO INTERVENTIONRoutine post-op discharge education is given to patients who undergo gynecological cancer surgery at the institution by nurses on the day of discharge.
Interventions
On post-op day 2, patients will receive Symptom Management Model-Based Lower Extremity Lymphedema Training. Brochures will be introduced and delivered to the patient.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women over 18 years of age,
- Able to speak and understand Turkish,
- Not having any cognitive, visual or auditory disabilities,
- Diagnosed with gynecological cancer (cervix, ovary, uterus, endometrium, vulva, etc.)
- Women who underwent gynecological surgery with inguinal and/or para-aortic and/or pelvic lymph node dissection due to malignancy.
- Women who have accepted and signed the consent and consent document
You may not qualify if:
- Women who diagnosed with venous insufficiency and peripheral artery disease,
- Women with previously diagnosed lower extremity lymphedema
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Koç Universitylead
Related Publications (11)
Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.
PMID: 8433390BACKGROUNDAbakay H, Abdulrezzak U, Akbayrak T. (2022). An Important Tool in Lymphedema Management: Validation of the Turkish Version of the Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire. Gynecol Obstet Reprod Med. https://doi.org/10.21613/GORM.2022.1348
BACKGROUNDBackler C, Beck M, Poage E. Lymphedema: Clinical Summary of the ONS Guidelines for Cancer Treatment-Related Lymphedema. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2020 Oct 1;24(5):566-570. doi: 10.1188/20.CJON.566-570.
PMID: 32945785BACKGROUNDBakar Y, Tugral A. Lower Extremity Lymphedema Management after Gynecologic Cancer Surgery: A Review of Current Management Strategies. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Oct;44:442-450. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.03.197. Epub 2017 May 5.
PMID: 28483624BACKGROUNDHayes SC, Janda M, Ward LC, Reul-Hirche H, Steele ML, Carter J, Quinn M, Cornish B, Obermair A. Lymphedema following gynecological cancer: Results from a prospective, longitudinal cohort study on prevalence, incidence and risk factors. Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Sep;146(3):623-629. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
PMID: 28624154BACKGROUNDBowman C, Piedalue KA, Baydoun M, Carlson LE. The Quality of Life and Psychosocial Implications of Cancer-Related Lower-Extremity Lymphedema: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 2;9(10):3200. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103200.
PMID: 33023211BACKGROUNDCal A, Bahar Z, Gorken I. Effects of Health Belief Model based nursing interventions offered at home visits on lymphedema prevention in women with breast cancer: A randomised controlled trial. J Clin Nurs. 2020 Jul;29(13-14):2521-2534. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15271. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
PMID: 32243029BACKGROUNDCankurtaran ES, Ozalp E, Soygur H, Ozer S, Akbiyik DI, Bottomley A. Understanding the reliability and validity of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Turkish cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2008 Jan;17(1):98-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2007.00827.x.
PMID: 18181898BACKGROUNDDeura I, Shimada M, Hirashita K, Sugimura M, Sato S, Sato S, Oishi T, Itamochi H, Harada T, Kigawa J. Incidence and risk factors for lower limb lymphedema after gynecologic cancer surgery with initiation of periodic complex decongestive physiotherapy. Int J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jun;20(3):556-60. doi: 10.1007/s10147-014-0724-0. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
PMID: 24993674BACKGROUNDDo JH, Choi KH, Ahn JS, Jeon JY. Effects of a complex rehabilitation program on edema status, physical function, and quality of life in lower-limb lymphedema after gynecological cancer surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Nov;147(2):450-455. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
PMID: 28941657BACKGROUNDIncirkus K, Nahcivan N. Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the self-efficacy for managing chronic disease 6-item scale. Turk J Med Sci. 2020 Aug 26;50(5):1254-1261. doi: 10.3906/sag-1910-13.
PMID: 32336077BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 1, 2024
First Posted
February 9, 2024
Study Start
March 1, 2024
Primary Completion
October 1, 2024
Study Completion
December 1, 2024
Last Updated
February 9, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01