Weight Loss and Physical Activity Lifestyle Interventions In Post Liver And Kidney Transplants
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This research project seeks to learn more about how lifestyle interventions can help liver and kidney transplant recipients achieve weight loss goals. The investigators want to evaluate if an intervention using weight and activity wrist monitors, as well as nutritional coaching group sessions is acceptable and useful for post-transplant patients aiming for weight loss. All participants will be given a wrist activity monitor, and a scale. Half of participants will be invited to participate in the nutritional coaching group sessions. The research team will look at weight loss, devices' usage, and satisfaction, and see if there are any difference among the two groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 28, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 22, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 8, 2024
CompletedFebruary 8, 2024
January 1, 2024
1.2 years
January 22, 2024
January 31, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Feasibility of intervention
The Feasibility of Intervention Measurement (FIM) is a previously-validated survey tool used in implementation science, and answered by participants, that uses a Likert scale from 1 to 5 to evaluate feasibility of the proposed intervention. A score greater than or equal to 4 is considered acceptable feasibility.
12 months (All study duration)
Acceptability of intervention
The Acceptability of Intervention Measurement (AIM) is a previously-validated survey tool used in implementation science, and answered by participants, that uses a Likert scale from 1 to 5 to evaluate acceptability of the proposed intervention. A score greater than or equal to 4 is considered adequate acceptability.
12 months (All study duration)
Rate of highly satisfied Patients
Patient-completed satisfaction questionnaires will be evaluated using a Likert scale from 1 to 5 with five being very satisfied and one being very unsatisfied. Satisfaction surveys were asked separately for the use of devices (Fitbit and smart scale), every other month follow-up calls, and every other month group sessions. An additional overall satisfaction score was also obtained for the entire intervention. High satisfaction will be considered the proportion of "somewhat satisfied" and "very satisfied" answers.
12 months (All study duration)
Wrist activity tracker usage rate
Usage rate will be calculated as the proportion of days in which steps are logged in relation to the number of days per month.
12 months (All study duration)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Weight change percentage
12 months (All study duration)
Study Arms (2)
Control group
OTHERPatients receive a wrist activity monitor and a scale. They are also followed with monthly calls ensuring adequate functioning of devices and receiving case-specific nutritional guidance.
Group intervention group
EXPERIMENTALIn addition to receiving a wrist activity monitor, scale, and being followed with monthly calls, patients in this arm received every other month nutritional coaching group sessions on topics related to nutrition and physical activity to promote education and lifestyle changes
Interventions
Wrist activity tracker used to evaluate number of steps, heart rate, and frequency of usage of the devices to monitor activity. Scale used to record a patient's weight value.
Nutritional coaching group sessions held via zoom and performed by a certified clinical nutritionist regarding nutrition, and physical activity specific for weight loss.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Prior liver or kidney transplant recipient
- BMI \>=30
- months to 10 years post-transplant
- Stable immunosuppression as defined by no treatment for rejection in the past 3 months
- Access to Smartphone or computer
- Able to provide informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Dual and/or simultaneous organ kidney and liver transplant
- Any type of other prior transplant
- Age \<= 18 years old
- Treatment for rejection within the last 3 months
- Major infection requiring hospitalization within the last 3 months
- Relisting for liver transplant or returned to dialysis for kidney transplant
- Physical inability to participate in lifestyle intervention activity recommendations
- Patients that are actively enrolled in a weight center program
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Massachusetts
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Related Publications (15)
Estes C, Razavi H, Loomba R, Younossi Z, Sanyal AJ. Modeling the epidemic of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease demonstrates an exponential increase in burden of disease. Hepatology. 2018 Jan;67(1):123-133. doi: 10.1002/hep.29466. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
PMID: 28802062BACKGROUNDSaeed N, Glass L, Sharma P, Shannon C, Sonnenday CJ, Tincopa MA. Incidence and Risks for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Steatohepatitis Post-liver Transplant: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Transplantation. 2019 Nov;103(11):e345-e354. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002916.
PMID: 31415032BACKGROUNDGermani G, Laryea M, Rubbia-Brandt L, Egawa H, Burra P, O'Grady J, Watt KD. Management of Recurrent and De Novo NAFLD/NASH After Liver Transplantation. Transplantation. 2019 Jan;103(1):57-67. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002485.
PMID: 30335694BACKGROUNDWang X, Li J, Riaz DR, Shi G, Liu C, Dai Y. Outcomes of liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Mar;12(3):394-402.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.09.023. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
PMID: 24076414BACKGROUNDCotter TG, Charlton M. Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis After Liver Transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2020 Jan;26(1):141-159. doi: 10.1002/lt.25657. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
PMID: 31610081BACKGROUNDWadden TA, Brownell KD, Foster GD. Obesity: responding to the global epidemic. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002 Jun;70(3):510-25. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.70.3.510.
PMID: 12090366BACKGROUNDO'Brien T, Russell CL, Tan A, Mion L, Rose K, Focht B, Daloul R, Hathaway D. A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Using SystemCHANGE Approach to Increase Physical Activity in Older Kidney Transplant Recipients. Prog Transplant. 2020 Dec;30(4):306-314. doi: 10.1177/1526924820958148. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
PMID: 32912051BACKGROUNDNeale J, Smith AC. Cardiovascular risk factors following renal transplant. World J Transplant. 2015 Dec 24;5(4):183-95. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v5.i4.183.
PMID: 26722646BACKGROUNDChen G, Gao L, Li X. Effects of exercise training on cardiovascular risk factors in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ren Fail. 2019 Nov;41(1):408-418. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2019.1611602.
PMID: 31106657BACKGROUNDAndres A, Saldana C, Gomez-Benito J. The transtheoretical model in weight management: validation of the processes of change questionnaire. Obes Facts. 2011;4(6):433-42. doi: 10.1159/000335135. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
PMID: 22248993BACKGROUNDAndres A, Saldana C, Gomez-Benito J. Establishing the stages and processes of change for weight loss by consensus of experts. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009 Sep;17(9):1717-23. doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.100. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
PMID: 19360014BACKGROUNDSteinberg DM, Bennett GG, Askew S, Tate DF. Weighing every day matters: daily weighing improves weight loss and adoption of weight control behaviors. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 Apr;115(4):511-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.12.011. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
PMID: 25683820BACKGROUNDPalmeira AL, Teixeira PJ, Branco TL, Martins SS, Minderico CS, Barata JT, Serpa SO, Sardinha LB. Predicting short-term weight loss using four leading health behavior change theories. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007 Apr 20;4:14. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-4-14.
PMID: 17448248BACKGROUNDTakacs J, Pollock CL, Guenther JR, Bahar M, Napier C, Hunt MA. Validation of the Fitbit One activity monitor device during treadmill walking. J Sci Med Sport. 2014 Sep;17(5):496-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.10.241. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
PMID: 24268570BACKGROUNDWeiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, Boynton MH, Halko H. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 29;12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3.
PMID: 28851459BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Leigh A Dageforde, MD, MPH
Massachusetts General Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 22, 2024
First Posted
February 8, 2024
Study Start
February 28, 2022
Primary Completion
April 30, 2023
Study Completion
May 30, 2023
Last Updated
February 8, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no plan to share individual participant data available to other researchers since all data analysis and publications that derive from the information collected through this trial will be handled and analyzed by the current research team. No additional analyses or data management other than the originally intended is planned or allowed.