Ecological Footprint Awareness Program in 60-72 Months Children
Effectiveness of Ecological Footprint Awareness Program in 60-72 Months Children: A Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
66
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an ecological footprint awareness training program for children aged 60-72 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 2, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 19, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 24, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 24, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 8, 2024
CompletedFebruary 8, 2024
February 1, 2024
3 months
January 24, 2024
February 7, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Ecological Footprint Awareness Scale for 60-72 Month-old Children scores
ıt contains five themes, including 'Water and energy use,' 'Waste utilization,' 'Food consumption,' and 'Transportation'. It contains a total of 19 items, which are asked through a game and story structure. he scale is divided into two sections: a game section and a story section. In the game section, children are shown pictures and asked how the characters should behave. In the story section, children are told a story and asked which character is behaving in an environmentally friendly way. Children who answer correctly receive a score of "1", while those who answer incorrectly receive a score of "0". The total score is used to measure environmental awareness. The KR-20 coefficient for internal consistency reliability of the EKAY-O was calculated as 0.66.
four weeks
Study Arms (2)
Ecological Footprint Awareness Program Group
EXPERIMENTALThe program was conducted for four weeks, one day each week, for 40 minutes. Each week, a different topic was addressed such as waste evaluation, water and energy usage, food consumption, and transportation. The program was created in line with expert opinions and literature.
Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONNo intervention was applied to the group
Interventions
The program was conducted for four weeks, one day each week, for 40 minutes. Each week, a different topic was addressed such as waste evaluation, water and energy usage, food consumption, and transportation. The program was created in line with expert opinions and literature. The sessions were based on the principles of the Social Cognitive Learning Theory, developed by Bandura, which includes mutual determinism, symbolization, anticipatory capacity, vicarious learning, self-regulation capacity, and self-judgment capacity. During each session, various techniques such as animation, drawing, storytelling, memory cards, and games were employed. To ensure the program's content was appropriate for children's development, the opinions of two experts from the child development department of the university were obtained.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- enrolled in the schools where the study was conducted
- Approved by their family to participate in the study,
- months old
You may not qualify if:
- participation in less than 2/3 of the intervention protocol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University
Burdur, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- The researcher responsible for the study identified the children who were assigned to the intervention and control groups. This person was not involved in the implementation of the study to ensure that measurement bias was controlled. To avoid detection bias, statistical bias, and reporting bias, a third researcher, who did not know which children were in the intervention and control groups, was responsible for coding and analyzing the research data.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 24, 2024
First Posted
February 8, 2024
Study Start
April 2, 2023
Primary Completion
June 19, 2023
Study Completion
July 24, 2023
Last Updated
February 8, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02