Histological Evaluation of Human Skin Bx to Assess the Effects of APR Tx as an Adjunct Procedure in Facelift Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
7
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The goal of this prospective, single-arm clinical study is to gather quantifiable data on Renuvion's impact on skin elasticity and hydration, indicators of skin quality and estimate the biological skin age using DNA methylation in males and females between 18 and 75 years of age who plan to receive a lower facelift surgery. The main purpose is to quantify the effect of the Renuvion device on skin elasticity (collagen density, elastin, fibrillin-1), hydration (aquaporin-3, acidic glycosaminoglycans, HA), and DNA methylation to estimate the biological age of the skin. Participants will receive a lower facelift surgery per the Investigator's standard clinical practice and treatment with the Renuvion APR System.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2023
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 30, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 18, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 6, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 10, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 10, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 24, 2026
CompletedMarch 24, 2026
March 1, 2026
1.6 years
December 18, 2023
December 5, 2025
March 20, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Analysis of Elasticity (Collagen & Elastin)
To assess Elasticity (collagen \& elastin) evaluation will be based on the qualitative histology in samples at baseline and Day 180 follow-up. Two samples from each time period were analyses - control and treatment area. The H\&E, trichrome, and van Gieson-stained slides were evaluated via light microscopy for any abnormalities and extracellular matrix changes. The results of histopathological assessment were scored using the industry standard 5-point scoring system. 0=Normal, 1=Minimal, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe.
Baseline, Day 180
Analyzing Days of Duration for Bruising, Swelling
Analysis days of duration of overall facial bruising and swelling post-treatment through the 180-day visit. The reported data is for the lower face treatment area only; the control area was not evaluated for bruising/swelling.
Post-Treatment, Day 1, 7, 14, 45, 90, 180
Percentage of Lower Face Area Healed
Percentage of the lower facial treatment area assessed as healed at each post-treatment time frame (Days 1, 7, 14, 45, 90 \& 180) based on investigator clinical evaluation documented in Case Report Forms. The reported data is for the lower face treatment area only; the control untreated mid/upper-face area was not evaluated for healing.
Post-Treatment, Day 1, 7, 14, 45, 90, 180
Bleeding
Analysis of bleeding during surgery measured in cubic centimeter. The reported data is for the lower face treatment area only; the control area was not evaluated for bleeding.
During Procedure (Day 0)
The Principal Investigator Will Complete a PGAIS Assessing Overall Aesthetic Improvement in the Treatment Area at Day 180 Post-treatment.
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale Evaluation (PGAIS) rating by investigator \[Very much improved, Much improved, Improved, No change, Worse, Much Worse, Very much Worse\]. The reported data is for the lower face treatment area only; the control area was not evaluated for GAIS as it was not treated.
Day 180
The Subject Will Complete a SGAIS Assessing Overall Aesthetic Improvement in the Treatment Area at Day 180 Post-treatment.
Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale Evaluation (SGAIS) rating by subject \[Very much improved, Much improved, Improved, No change, Worse, Much Worse, Very much Worse\]. The reported data is for the lower face treatment area only; the control area was not evaluated for GAIS as it was not treated.
Day 180
Patient Satisfaction
The subject will complete a Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) while referring to their image in a mirror and current post-treatment photos compared to baseline photos to rate how satisfied they are, and if they note any improvement in the treatment area. The reported data is for the lower face treatment area only; the control area was not evaluated for PSQ as it was not treated.
Day 180
Study Arms (1)
Procedure with the Renuvion APR System in lower facelift area
OTHERSubjects will receive a lower facelift surgery per the Investigator's standard clinical practice and treatment with the Renuvion APR System.
Interventions
The Apyx Medical Corporation Renuvion/J-Plasma helium plasma family of products has received FDA clearance under 510(k) numbers K191542, K192867 for the cutting, coagulation, and ablation of soft tissue.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female subjects, ages 18 - 75 years old.
- ASA Physical Status Classification System Class I and Class II subjects.
- Planning to undergo a lower facelift procedure, with or without a neck lift, at the investigator's site.
- Understands and accepts the obligation not to undergo any other procedures or treatments in the areas to be treated during study participation.
- Absence of physical conditions unacceptable to the investigator.
- Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active must be willing to use an approved method of birth control during study participation.
- Willing and able to comply with protocol requirements, including study-required images/photos, assessments/measurements, and returning for follow-up visits.
- Willing to release rights for the use of study photos, including in publication.
- Able to read, understand, sign, and date the informed consent.
- Able to communicate with the site via video and/or photographs, in the event of a virtual follow-up visit.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects presenting with ASA Physical Status Classification System Classes III or higher.
- Pregnant, lactating, or plans to become pregnant during study participation.
- Known hypersensitivity or allergy to tumescent anesthetic (lidocaine/ epinephrine).
- Known hypersensitivity or allergy to ibuprofen or other NSAIDS.
- Active systemic or local skin disease that may alter wound healing.
- Significant or uncontrolled medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator participation in the study may compromise the patient's health.
- History of autoimmune disease (excluding Hashimoto's thyroiditis).
- Known susceptibility to keloid formation or hypertrophic scarring.
- Cancerous or pre-cancerous lesions in the area to be treated.
- Possesses a surgically implanted electronic device (i.e. pacemaker).
- Serious mental health illness such as dementia or schizophrenia; psychiatric hospitalization in the past two years.
- Participation in any other investigational study within 30 days prior to consent and throughout study participation.
- Subject who, in the opinion of the investigator, is not an appropriate candidate for the study.
- Subject who has had a prior facelift, neck lift, or Renuvion treatment in the face/neck area
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Apyx Medicallead
Study Sites (2)
LA Plastic Surgery and Dermatology
Bradenton, Florida, 34208, United States
Holcomb & Kreithen Plastic Surgery and MedSpa
Sarasota, Florida, 34237, United States
Related Publications (19)
Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS, Halpern EF, Rittman WJ, Mueller PR, Rosenthal DI. Radiofrequency tissue ablation: importance of local temperature along the electrode tip exposure in determining lesion shape and size. Acad Radiol. 1996 Mar;3(3):212-8. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(96)80443-0.
PMID: 8796667BACKGROUNDThomsen S. Pathologic analysis of photothermal and photomechanical effects of laser-tissue interactions. Photochem Photobiol. 1991 Jun;53(6):825-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1991.tb09897.x.
PMID: 1886941BACKGROUNDRoss EV, McKinlay JR, Anderson RR. Why does carbon dioxide resurfacing work? A review. Arch Dermatol. 1999 Apr;135(4):444-54. doi: 10.1001/archderm.135.4.444.
PMID: 10206052BACKGROUNDGardner ES, Reinisch L, Stricklin GP, Ellis DL. In vitro changes in non-facial human skin following CO2 laser resurfacing: a comparison study. Lasers Surg Med. 1996;19(4):379-87. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1996)19:43.0.CO;2-P.
PMID: 8982996BACKGROUNDDoshi SN, Alster TS. Combination radiofrequency and diode laser for treatment of facial rhytides and skin laxity. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2005 Mar;7(1):11-5. doi: 10.1080/14764170410003075.
PMID: 16020210BACKGROUNDFatemi A, Weiss MA, Weiss RA. Short-term histologic effects of nonablative resurfacing: results with a dynamically cooled millisecond-domain 1320 nm Nd:YAG laser. Dermatol Surg. 2002 Feb;28(2):172-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.01112.x.
PMID: 11860431BACKGROUNDMayoral FA. Skin tightening with a combined unipolar and bipolar radiofrequency device. J Drugs Dermatol. 2007 Feb;6(2):212-5.
PMID: 17373181BACKGROUNDAlster TS, Doshi SN, Hopping SB. Combination surgical lifting with ablative laser skin resurfacing of facial skin: a retrospective analysis. Dermatol Surg. 2004 Sep;30(9):1191-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30370.x.
PMID: 15355357BACKGROUNDZelickson BD, Kist D, Bernstein E, Brown DB, Ksenzenko S, Burns J, Kilmer S, Mehregan D, Pope K. Histological and ultrastructural evaluation of the effects of a radiofrequency-based nonablative dermal remodeling device: a pilot study. Arch Dermatol. 2004 Feb;140(2):204-9. doi: 10.1001/archderm.140.2.204.
PMID: 14967794BACKGROUNDHsu TS, Kaminer MS. The use of nonablative radiofrequency technology to tighten the lower face and neck. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2003 Jun;22(2):115-23. doi: 10.1053/sder.2003.50011.
PMID: 12877230BACKGROUNDPaul M, Blugerman G, Kreindel M, Mulholland RS. Three-dimensional radiofrequency tissue tightening: a proposed mechanism and applications for body contouring. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011 Feb;35(1):87-95. doi: 10.1007/s00266-010-9564-0. Epub 2010 Sep 11.
PMID: 20835826BACKGROUNDHurwitz D, Smith D. Treatment of overweight patients by radiofrequency-assisted liposuction (RFAL) for aesthetic reshaping and skin tightening. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012 Feb;36(1):62-71. doi: 10.1007/s00266-011-9783-z. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
PMID: 21751063BACKGROUNDIrvine Duncan D. Nonexcisional tissue tightening: creating skin surface area reduction during abdominal liposuction by adding radiofrequency heating. Aesthet Surg J. 2013 Nov 1;33(8):1154-66. doi: 10.1177/1090820X13505862.
PMID: 24335016BACKGROUNDBoeni R. Safety of tumescent liposuction under local anesthesia in a series of 4,380 patients. Dermatology. 2011;222(3):278-81. doi: 10.1159/000327375. Epub 2011 May 24.
PMID: 21606638BACKGROUNDNakab L, Hee CK, Guetta O. Improvements in Skin Quality Biological Markers in Skin Explants Using Hyaluronic Acid Filler VYC-12L. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Mar 27;8(3):e2723. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002723. eCollection 2020 Mar.
PMID: 32537370BACKGROUNDvan Dongen JA, Langeveld M, van de Lande LS, Harmsen MC, Stevens HP, van der Lei B. The Effects of Facial Lipografting on Skin Quality: A Systematic Review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Nov;144(5):784e-797e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006147.
PMID: 31688753BACKGROUNDNarins RS, Brandt F, Leyden J, Lorenc ZP, Rubin M, Smith S. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of Restylane versus Zyplast for the correction of nasolabial folds. Dermatol Surg. 2003 Jun;29(6):588-95. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2003.29150.x.
PMID: 12786700BACKGROUNDBoroni M, Zonari A, Reis de Oliveira C, Alkatib K, Ochoa Cruz EA, Brace LE, Lott de Carvalho J. Highly accurate skin-specific methylome analysis algorithm as a platform to screen and validate therapeutics for healthy aging. Clin Epigenetics. 2020 Jul 13;12(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13148-020-00899-1.
PMID: 32660606BACKGROUNDFuchshuber P, Schwaitzberg S, Jones D, Jones SB, Feldman L, Munro M, Robinson T, Purcell-Jackson G, Mikami D, Madani A, Brunt M, Dunkin B, Gugliemi C, Groah L, Lim R, Mischna J, Voyles CR. The SAGES Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy program (FUSE): history, development, and purpose. Surg Endosc. 2018 Jun;32(6):2583-2602. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5933-y. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
PMID: 29218661BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Kari Larson, Sr. Director, Clinical Affairs
- Organization
- Apyx Medical
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Holcomb, M.D.
Holcomb & Kreithen Plastic Surgery and MedSpa
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Melinda Lacerna, M.D.
LA Plastic Surgery & Dermatology
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 18, 2023
First Posted
February 6, 2024
Study Start
November 30, 2023
Primary Completion
July 10, 2025
Study Completion
July 10, 2025
Last Updated
March 24, 2026
Results First Posted
March 24, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share