NCT06243744

Brief Summary

The goal of this prospective, single-arm clinical study is to gather quantifiable data on Renuvion's impact on skin elasticity and hydration, indicators of skin quality and estimate the biological skin age using DNA methylation in males and females between 18 and 75 years of age who plan to receive a lower facelift surgery. The main purpose is to quantify the effect of the Renuvion device on skin elasticity (collagen density, elastin, fibrillin-1), hydration (aquaporin-3, acidic glycosaminoglycans, HA), and DNA methylation to estimate the biological age of the skin. Participants will receive a lower facelift surgery per the Investigator's standard clinical practice and treatment with the Renuvion APR System.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
7

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 30, 2023

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 18, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 6, 2024

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 10, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 10, 2025

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 24, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

March 24, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

December 18, 2023

Results QC Date

December 5, 2025

Last Update Submit

March 20, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Analysis of Elasticity (Collagen & Elastin)

    To assess Elasticity (collagen \& elastin) evaluation will be based on the qualitative histology in samples at baseline and Day 180 follow-up. Two samples from each time period were analyses - control and treatment area. The H\&E, trichrome, and van Gieson-stained slides were evaluated via light microscopy for any abnormalities and extracellular matrix changes. The results of histopathological assessment were scored using the industry standard 5-point scoring system. 0=Normal, 1=Minimal, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe.

    Baseline, Day 180

  • Analyzing Days of Duration for Bruising, Swelling

    Analysis days of duration of overall facial bruising and swelling post-treatment through the 180-day visit. The reported data is for the lower face treatment area only; the control area was not evaluated for bruising/swelling.

    Post-Treatment, Day 1, 7, 14, 45, 90, 180

  • Percentage of Lower Face Area Healed

    Percentage of the lower facial treatment area assessed as healed at each post-treatment time frame (Days 1, 7, 14, 45, 90 \& 180) based on investigator clinical evaluation documented in Case Report Forms. The reported data is for the lower face treatment area only; the control untreated mid/upper-face area was not evaluated for healing.

    Post-Treatment, Day 1, 7, 14, 45, 90, 180

  • Bleeding

    Analysis of bleeding during surgery measured in cubic centimeter. The reported data is for the lower face treatment area only; the control area was not evaluated for bleeding.

    During Procedure (Day 0)

  • The Principal Investigator Will Complete a PGAIS Assessing Overall Aesthetic Improvement in the Treatment Area at Day 180 Post-treatment.

    Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale Evaluation (PGAIS) rating by investigator \[Very much improved, Much improved, Improved, No change, Worse, Much Worse, Very much Worse\]. The reported data is for the lower face treatment area only; the control area was not evaluated for GAIS as it was not treated.

    Day 180

  • The Subject Will Complete a SGAIS Assessing Overall Aesthetic Improvement in the Treatment Area at Day 180 Post-treatment.

    Subject Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale Evaluation (SGAIS) rating by subject \[Very much improved, Much improved, Improved, No change, Worse, Much Worse, Very much Worse\]. The reported data is for the lower face treatment area only; the control area was not evaluated for GAIS as it was not treated.

    Day 180

  • Patient Satisfaction

    The subject will complete a Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) while referring to their image in a mirror and current post-treatment photos compared to baseline photos to rate how satisfied they are, and if they note any improvement in the treatment area. The reported data is for the lower face treatment area only; the control area was not evaluated for PSQ as it was not treated.

    Day 180

Study Arms (1)

Procedure with the Renuvion APR System in lower facelift area

OTHER

Subjects will receive a lower facelift surgery per the Investigator's standard clinical practice and treatment with the Renuvion APR System.

Device: Renuvion APR System

Interventions

The Apyx Medical Corporation Renuvion/J-Plasma helium plasma family of products has received FDA clearance under 510(k) numbers K191542, K192867 for the cutting, coagulation, and ablation of soft tissue.

Procedure with the Renuvion APR System in lower facelift area

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female subjects, ages 18 - 75 years old.
  • ASA Physical Status Classification System Class I and Class II subjects.
  • Planning to undergo a lower facelift procedure, with or without a neck lift, at the investigator's site.
  • Understands and accepts the obligation not to undergo any other procedures or treatments in the areas to be treated during study participation.
  • Absence of physical conditions unacceptable to the investigator.
  • Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active must be willing to use an approved method of birth control during study participation.
  • Willing and able to comply with protocol requirements, including study-required images/photos, assessments/measurements, and returning for follow-up visits.
  • Willing to release rights for the use of study photos, including in publication.
  • Able to read, understand, sign, and date the informed consent.
  • Able to communicate with the site via video and/or photographs, in the event of a virtual follow-up visit.

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects presenting with ASA Physical Status Classification System Classes III or higher.
  • Pregnant, lactating, or plans to become pregnant during study participation.
  • Known hypersensitivity or allergy to tumescent anesthetic (lidocaine/ epinephrine).
  • Known hypersensitivity or allergy to ibuprofen or other NSAIDS.
  • Active systemic or local skin disease that may alter wound healing.
  • Significant or uncontrolled medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator participation in the study may compromise the patient's health.
  • History of autoimmune disease (excluding Hashimoto's thyroiditis).
  • Known susceptibility to keloid formation or hypertrophic scarring.
  • Cancerous or pre-cancerous lesions in the area to be treated.
  • Possesses a surgically implanted electronic device (i.e. pacemaker).
  • Serious mental health illness such as dementia or schizophrenia; psychiatric hospitalization in the past two years.
  • Participation in any other investigational study within 30 days prior to consent and throughout study participation.
  • Subject who, in the opinion of the investigator, is not an appropriate candidate for the study.
  • Subject who has had a prior facelift, neck lift, or Renuvion treatment in the face/neck area

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

LA Plastic Surgery and Dermatology

Bradenton, Florida, 34208, United States

Location

Holcomb & Kreithen Plastic Surgery and MedSpa

Sarasota, Florida, 34237, United States

Location

Related Publications (19)

  • Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS, Halpern EF, Rittman WJ, Mueller PR, Rosenthal DI. Radiofrequency tissue ablation: importance of local temperature along the electrode tip exposure in determining lesion shape and size. Acad Radiol. 1996 Mar;3(3):212-8. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(96)80443-0.

    PMID: 8796667BACKGROUND
  • Thomsen S. Pathologic analysis of photothermal and photomechanical effects of laser-tissue interactions. Photochem Photobiol. 1991 Jun;53(6):825-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1991.tb09897.x.

    PMID: 1886941BACKGROUND
  • Ross EV, McKinlay JR, Anderson RR. Why does carbon dioxide resurfacing work? A review. Arch Dermatol. 1999 Apr;135(4):444-54. doi: 10.1001/archderm.135.4.444.

    PMID: 10206052BACKGROUND
  • Gardner ES, Reinisch L, Stricklin GP, Ellis DL. In vitro changes in non-facial human skin following CO2 laser resurfacing: a comparison study. Lasers Surg Med. 1996;19(4):379-87. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1996)19:43.0.CO;2-P.

    PMID: 8982996BACKGROUND
  • Doshi SN, Alster TS. Combination radiofrequency and diode laser for treatment of facial rhytides and skin laxity. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2005 Mar;7(1):11-5. doi: 10.1080/14764170410003075.

    PMID: 16020210BACKGROUND
  • Fatemi A, Weiss MA, Weiss RA. Short-term histologic effects of nonablative resurfacing: results with a dynamically cooled millisecond-domain 1320 nm Nd:YAG laser. Dermatol Surg. 2002 Feb;28(2):172-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.01112.x.

    PMID: 11860431BACKGROUND
  • Mayoral FA. Skin tightening with a combined unipolar and bipolar radiofrequency device. J Drugs Dermatol. 2007 Feb;6(2):212-5.

    PMID: 17373181BACKGROUND
  • Alster TS, Doshi SN, Hopping SB. Combination surgical lifting with ablative laser skin resurfacing of facial skin: a retrospective analysis. Dermatol Surg. 2004 Sep;30(9):1191-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30370.x.

    PMID: 15355357BACKGROUND
  • Zelickson BD, Kist D, Bernstein E, Brown DB, Ksenzenko S, Burns J, Kilmer S, Mehregan D, Pope K. Histological and ultrastructural evaluation of the effects of a radiofrequency-based nonablative dermal remodeling device: a pilot study. Arch Dermatol. 2004 Feb;140(2):204-9. doi: 10.1001/archderm.140.2.204.

    PMID: 14967794BACKGROUND
  • Hsu TS, Kaminer MS. The use of nonablative radiofrequency technology to tighten the lower face and neck. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2003 Jun;22(2):115-23. doi: 10.1053/sder.2003.50011.

    PMID: 12877230BACKGROUND
  • Paul M, Blugerman G, Kreindel M, Mulholland RS. Three-dimensional radiofrequency tissue tightening: a proposed mechanism and applications for body contouring. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011 Feb;35(1):87-95. doi: 10.1007/s00266-010-9564-0. Epub 2010 Sep 11.

    PMID: 20835826BACKGROUND
  • Hurwitz D, Smith D. Treatment of overweight patients by radiofrequency-assisted liposuction (RFAL) for aesthetic reshaping and skin tightening. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012 Feb;36(1):62-71. doi: 10.1007/s00266-011-9783-z. Epub 2011 Jul 13.

    PMID: 21751063BACKGROUND
  • Irvine Duncan D. Nonexcisional tissue tightening: creating skin surface area reduction during abdominal liposuction by adding radiofrequency heating. Aesthet Surg J. 2013 Nov 1;33(8):1154-66. doi: 10.1177/1090820X13505862.

    PMID: 24335016BACKGROUND
  • Boeni R. Safety of tumescent liposuction under local anesthesia in a series of 4,380 patients. Dermatology. 2011;222(3):278-81. doi: 10.1159/000327375. Epub 2011 May 24.

    PMID: 21606638BACKGROUND
  • Nakab L, Hee CK, Guetta O. Improvements in Skin Quality Biological Markers in Skin Explants Using Hyaluronic Acid Filler VYC-12L. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Mar 27;8(3):e2723. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002723. eCollection 2020 Mar.

    PMID: 32537370BACKGROUND
  • van Dongen JA, Langeveld M, van de Lande LS, Harmsen MC, Stevens HP, van der Lei B. The Effects of Facial Lipografting on Skin Quality: A Systematic Review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Nov;144(5):784e-797e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006147.

    PMID: 31688753BACKGROUND
  • Narins RS, Brandt F, Leyden J, Lorenc ZP, Rubin M, Smith S. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of Restylane versus Zyplast for the correction of nasolabial folds. Dermatol Surg. 2003 Jun;29(6):588-95. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2003.29150.x.

    PMID: 12786700BACKGROUND
  • Boroni M, Zonari A, Reis de Oliveira C, Alkatib K, Ochoa Cruz EA, Brace LE, Lott de Carvalho J. Highly accurate skin-specific methylome analysis algorithm as a platform to screen and validate therapeutics for healthy aging. Clin Epigenetics. 2020 Jul 13;12(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13148-020-00899-1.

    PMID: 32660606BACKGROUND
  • Fuchshuber P, Schwaitzberg S, Jones D, Jones SB, Feldman L, Munro M, Robinson T, Purcell-Jackson G, Mikami D, Madani A, Brunt M, Dunkin B, Gugliemi C, Groah L, Lim R, Mischna J, Voyles CR. The SAGES Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy program (FUSE): history, development, and purpose. Surg Endosc. 2018 Jun;32(6):2583-2602. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5933-y. Epub 2017 Dec 7.

    PMID: 29218661BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cutis Laxa

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Skin Diseases, GeneticGenetic Diseases, InbornCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesConnective Tissue DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesSkin Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Kari Larson, Sr. Director, Clinical Affairs
Organization
Apyx Medical

Study Officials

  • David Holcomb, M.D.

    Holcomb & Kreithen Plastic Surgery and MedSpa

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Melinda Lacerna, M.D.

    LA Plastic Surgery & Dermatology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: This is a prospective single-arm, study of up to 10 study subjects undergoing a lower facelift surgery and treatment with the Renuvion APR System. The study will be conducted at up to three (3) investigational centers in the United States. Two biopsy tissue samples will be taken during the facelift procedure prior to use of the Renuvion APR System and then at the Day 180 visit. Tissue samples will be assessed via microscopy, histology, and immunohistochemistry for biological markers of elasticity (collagen density, elastin, fibrillin-1) and hydration (\[aquaporin-3, acidic glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), HA\]). Additionally, DNA methylation will be measured in tissue samples to estimate the biological age of the skin. Follow-up will occur 1 day, 2 days (optional), 7 days, 14 days, 45 days, 90 days, and 180 days post-procedure with images and skin quality measurements taken as described.
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2023

First Posted

February 6, 2024

Study Start

November 30, 2023

Primary Completion

July 10, 2025

Study Completion

July 10, 2025

Last Updated

March 24, 2026

Results First Posted

March 24, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations