Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Dry Needling Treatment in Patients Diagnosed with Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
55
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (GTPS) is characterized by lateral hip pain, pain radiating to the lateral leg, tenderness and rotation around the greater trochanter, and pain with specific activities such as abduction or adduction. GTPS is primarily diagnosed clinically. Conservative treatment for GTPS includes activity modification, physiotherapy, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, local corticosteroids, and platelet-rich plasma injections. Particularly, regional muscle sensitivity, such as in the gluteus maximus, is prominent. In recent years, dry needling therapy, which has gained popularity and increased research attention, has become an alternative treatment option, especially if the underlying cause is myofascial pain syndrome or deeper issues like piriformis syndrome. The provided text discusses dry needling as a treatment for various neuromusculoskeletal pain conditions, emphasizing its use as a minimally invasive procedure that involves applying filiform needles to the relevant muscle tissue without the administration of pharmacological drugs. The literature suggests that dry needling therapy has the ability to induce biochemical, biomechanical, endocrinological, and neurovascular changes associated with the reduction of pain and disability in individuals. However, the optimal treatment dosage has not yet been determined, and there is inconsistency in the literature regarding the number of needles to be inserted and the duration of needle retention. Studies evaluating the effectiveness of dry needling are often designed to compare or add it to other injection therapies. Additionally, there is a limited number of studies conducted with real-time imaging. In the planned study, the use of ultrasound-guided dry needling aims to provide a sham application opportunity, where the patient is blinded to the nature of the procedure, allowing for a meaningful investigation of efficacy. This aspect of the study is expected to contribute significantly to the literature.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 28, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 20, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 10, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 15, 2025
CompletedMarch 11, 2025
March 1, 2025
9 months
January 28, 2024
March 8, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Visual Analog Scale
"Visual Analog Scale (VAS)" is a measurement instrument often used in healthcare to assess the intensity or characteristics of subjective experiences such as pain. It typically consists of a straight line, usually 10 centimeters in length, with endpoints representing extremes (e.g., "no pain" to "worst imaginable pain"). Patients mark on the line to indicate their subjective experience, and the distance from one endpoint provides a numerical score representing the intensity of the sensation being measured. The VAS is commonly employed in pain assessment but can also be adapted for various other subjective evaluations.
Time frame 1: Up to 24 hour before the first intervention, Time frame 2: Up to 24 hour before the second intervention, Time frame 3: Up to 24 hour before the third intervention, Time frame 4: One week (and one month) after the last intervention.
Patient-Specific Functional Scale
"Patient-Specific Functional Scale" (PSFS). The PSFS is a self-report outcome measure commonly used in healthcare, particularly in physical therapy and rehabilitation settings. It is designed to assess the patient's perceived difficulty in performing specific activities that are relevant to their daily life and function. Identification of Activities: The patient is asked to identify and list three to five activities that they find challenging or have difficulty performing due to their condition or symptoms. Rating Scale: For each identified activity, the patient is asked to rate their current level of difficulty on a numerical scale, often ranging from 0 to 10. A score of 0 indicates no difficulty, while 10 indicates the maximum difficulty. Follow-up Assessments: The same activities and rating scale are used in follow-up assessments to track changes over time or in response to interventions.
Time frame 1: Up to 24 hour before the first intervention, Time frame 2: Up to 24 hour before the second intervention, Time frame 3: Up to 24 hour before the third intervention, Time frame 4: One week (and one month) after the last intervention.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Pressure Pain Threshold Measurement
Time frame 1: Up to 24 hour before the first intervention, Time frame 2: Up to 24 hour before the second intervention, Time frame 3: Up to 24 hour before the third intervention, Time frame 4: One week (and one month) after the last intervention.
The Oswestry Disability Index
Time frame 1: Up to 24 hour before the first intervention, Time frame 2: One week after the last intervention.
Hip ROM Measurement
Time frame 1: Up to 24 hour before the first intervention, Time frame 2: One week after the last intervention.
Study Arms (2)
Dry needling group (study group)
EXPERIMENTALFor patients in this group, dry needling will be performed once a week for three weeks on trigger points described as pain points in the Copeman nodule, gluteus medius, gluteus maximus, and iliotibial band muscles, guided by ultrasound. Patients will be instructed to perform daily stretching exercises outlined in the home program and mark their daily use of paracetamol on the provided schedule if needed. They will refrain from using NSAIDs or steroids during this period.
Sham dry needling group (control group)
SHAM COMPARATORFor the patients in this group, dry needling will be performed once a week for three weeks on trigger points described as pain points in the Copeman nodule, gluteus medius, gluteus maximus, and iliotibial band muscles, guided by ultrasound. However, the needles will not penetrate beyond the subcutaneous fatty tissue. Patients will be instructed to perform daily stretching exercises outlined in the home program and mark their daily use of paracetamol on the provided schedule if needed. They will refrain from using NSAIDs or steroids during this period.
Interventions
Dry needling will be performed using a 27-gauge, 5 cm long dental needle, guided by ultrasound, on predetermined trigger points in patients.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 80 years old. Ability to read and write. Clinically diagnosed with greater trochanteric pain syndrome. Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score of 6 or higher.
You may not qualify if:
- History of previous lumbar and hip surgery. Lesions, atrophy, or scars in the skin around the hip area. Received physiotherapy for the hip, lumbar, or lower extremities in the last 6 months.
- Underwent an interventional procedure for the hip or lumbar region for the same reason in the last 3 months.
- Used steroids in the last 1 month. Special conditions such as epilepsy, pregnancy, injection phobia, etc. Inability to comply with the restriction on the use of both steroid and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs during the treatment period.
- Subcutaneous fat tissue thickness in the hip area being 5 cm or more.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kutahya Health Sciences University
Kütahya, Kütahya, 43020, Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hasan H Gökpınar, Ass. Prof.
Kutahya Health Sciences University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 28, 2024
First Posted
February 5, 2024
Study Start
March 20, 2024
Primary Completion
December 10, 2024
Study Completion
February 15, 2025
Last Updated
March 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share