Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients on DOAC
DOAC-IVT
1 other identifier
interventional
260
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have emerged as safe and efficacious ischemic stroke prophylaxis for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). All four DOACs - apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, rivaroxaban - were associated with lower risks of major bleeding compared to warfarin. Listed as core essential medicines by the World Health Organization, DOAC prescriptions have been surging worldwide. In Hong Kong, approximately 80,000 patients received DOACs from January 2009 through December 2022 according to the Hospital Authority registry. The widespread DOAC usage had created DOAC-specific clinical dilemmas that lack evidence-based treatment despite twenty years of prescribing experience. Ischemic stroke despite DOAC (IS-DOAC), in particular, may occur in up to 6% of DOAC users annually. Due to the in vivo anticoagulation effect, there had been concerns of intracerebral bleeding (ICH) with intravenous thrombolytic therapy (IVT) for acute IS-DOAC. Under the current guideline recommendations, most acute IS-DOAC are contraindicated to IVT (see Intravenous thrombolytic therapy), which resulted in only a small proportion of acute ISDOAC patients being able to receive IVT even if presented early. Nonetheless, our group found that majority of patients had a DOAC level of \<50ng/mL only 24 hours after DOAC cessation (see work done by us), a level deemed clinically negligible and safe for thrombolytic therapy. Together with evolving clinical evidence discussed below, IS-DOAC patients maybe unnecessarily barred from IVT, thus compromised functional recovery. With robust pharmacokinetic and retrospective clinical evidence to support, it is hypothesized that IVT are safe in IS-DOAC patient. The investigators hereby propose a prospective multicenter study to determine the efficacy and safety of IVT in acute IS-DOAC.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 17, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 15, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 12, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2029
February 24, 2026
February 1, 2026
4.7 years
January 17, 2024
February 21, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Presence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH)
As primary safety outcome. By the Heidelberg Bleeding Classification, the investigators shall categorize intracranial hemorrhages into HI1, HI2, PH1, PH2, and define symptomatic ICH as blood at any site in the brain with clinical deterioration (e.g. drowsiness and increased hemiparesis) or an increase in National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of ≥ 4 points (scores ranging from 0-42, higher scores indicating greater severity.)
up to 1 year
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)
To measure the degree of disability as a primary efficacy outcome, on the scale of 0-6: 0= no symptoms at all, 6=dead
3 months after CVA
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Presence of asymptomatic ICH
up to 1 year
Presence of hemorrhagic transformation
up to 1 year
Presence of malignant cerebral edema
up to 1 year
Study Arms (2)
IVT group
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor patients enrolled into the IVT group from participating centers that allow IVT in patients with last DOAC intake 12-48 hours before presentation (PWH, QEH, QMH, UCH, TMH): Either alteplase (0.6 or 0.9mg/kg, maximum dosage 90mg, intravenous infusion) or tenecteplase (0.25mg/kg, maximum dosage 25mg, intravenous infusion) will be given at discretion of the treating physician.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONFor patients enrolled into the control group from participating centers that exclude eligible patients from IVT (PMH, PYNEH): no IVT will be given unless specific antidote can be administered before IVT.
Interventions
Either alteplase (0.6 or 0.9mg/kg, maximum dosage 90mg) or tenecteplase (0.25mg/kg, maximum dosage 25mg) will be given
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Acute ischemic stroke patients with a last-known-well to presentation time within 4.5 hours
- Patients who took any doses of apixaban (2.5mg or 5mg twice daily), dabigatran (110mg or 150mg twice daily), edoxaban (30mg or 60mg daily) or rivaroxaban (15mg or 20mg daily) 12-48 hours before presentation
- National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥ 3
- Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT (ASPECT) score ≥ 6
- Pre-morbid modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤ 3
- Patients aged ≥ 18 years old
You may not qualify if:
- Initial CT brain showing intracranial haemorrhage
- Contraindications to IVT according to current guideline recommendations \[5\], except for the use of DOAC within 12-48 hours
- Patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of ≤ 30ml/min/1.73m2
- Patients with bleeding propensities apart from the use of DOAC, e.g. platelet count of \< 100x109/L
- Patients with significant head injury immediately prior to presentation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kongcollaborator
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Canadacollaborator
- Tuen Mun Hospitalcollaborator
- The Queen Elizabeth Hospitalcollaborator
- United Christian Hospitalcollaborator
- Chinese University of Hong Konglead
- Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bonaventure Yiu Ming Ip, MB ChB
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 17, 2024
First Posted
February 5, 2024
Study Start
April 15, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 12, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 31, 2029
Last Updated
February 24, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share