NCT06239454

Brief Summary

This study is designed as a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study to assess putative differences in the effect of interleaving stimulation and empirical stimulation with regards to post-operation dyskinesia control. The primary objective is to assess putative differences in the effect of interleaving stimulation and empirical stimulation with regards to dyskinesia control.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2022

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 14, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 2, 2024

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 28, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

February 2, 2024

Status Verified

January 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

December 14, 2023

Last Update Submit

January 25, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Interleaving stimulationdyskinesia syndrome in in Parkinson's diseaserandomized, double-blind, controlled trial

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • dyskinesia scores (United Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part IV, item 32 + item 33)

    Measure the changes of dyskinesia scores (United Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part IV, item 32 + item 33) in interleaving stimulation compared to empirical programming modes. The total scores range from 0 (good health) to 4 (poor health).

    3 months and 9 months

  • Parkinson's disease quality of life-39 (PDQ-39) scores

    Measure the changes of Parkinson's disease quality of life-39 (PDQ-39) scores in interleaving stimulation compared to empirical programming modes. The total scores range from 0 (good health) to 156 (poor health).

    3 months and 9 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • scores of United Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III

    3 months and 9 months

  • Montreal cognitive assessment scores

    3 months and 9 months

Study Arms (2)

empirical stimulation modes group (ESG)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

empirical programming for the first 9 months' period, followed by any stimulation decided by the neurologists/neurosurgeons for the final 3 months.

Device: empirical stimulation

interleaving stimulation modes group (ISG)

EXPERIMENTAL

empirical stimulation for the first 3 months, followed by interleaving programming period for 6 months, and any stimulation decided by the neurologists/neurosurgeons for the final 3 months.

Device: interleaving stimulation

Interventions

ILS consists of two rapid and alternate stimulation programs with different contacts, amplitudes, and pulse width but the same frequency up to a maximum of 125Hz. Contact selection is determined by postoperative stereotactic computed tomography and clinical evaluation to achieve a balance between motor improvement and tolerable side effects. For example, ILS is successfully applied for PD motor symptoms (stimulation of subthalamic nucleus) as well as dyskinesia (additional stimulation of zona incerta).

interleaving stimulation modes group (ISG)

Patients are settled with simple polar stimulation with combined parameters adjustment (monopolar mode, 60\~90µs pulse width, 130\~185Hz frequency and varied voltage) during the follow-up.

empirical stimulation modes group (ESG)

Eligibility Criteria

Age30 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \. Patients at the age of 30-65 years old. 2. Patients diagnosed as Parkinson's disease according to the UK Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank criteria.
  • \. Patients at Hoehn and Yahr stage 3 or lower in the on-state and stage 2 - 4 in the off-state.
  • \. The disease duration of 5 years or more. 5. Patients with deep levodopa-responsive Parkinson's disease, and are not adequately controlled by drug therapy.

You may not qualify if:

  • major illness or medical comorbidities, depression that is untreated but judged to be clinically significant by an investigator, cochlear implants, cardiac pacemakers, needs for diathermy, anticoagulant therapy, previous neuro-surgical procedure or ablative therapy, frank dementia according to cognitive screening, drug or alcohol abuse, being a woman of child-bearing potential, having a positive pregnancy test, or presence of a terminal illness.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Huashan Hospital

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200040, China

RECRUITING

Related Publications (11)

  • Wiens BL, Iglewicz B. Design and analysis of three treatment equivalence trials. Control Clin Trials. 2000 Apr;21(2):127-37. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(99)00052-5.

    PMID: 10715510BACKGROUND
  • Schuepbach WM, Rau J, Knudsen K, Volkmann J, Krack P, Timmermann L, Halbig TD, Hesekamp H, Navarro SM, Meier N, Falk D, Mehdorn M, Paschen S, Maarouf M, Barbe MT, Fink GR, Kupsch A, Gruber D, Schneider GH, Seigneuret E, Kistner A, Chaynes P, Ory-Magne F, Brefel Courbon C, Vesper J, Schnitzler A, Wojtecki L, Houeto JL, Bataille B, Maltete D, Damier P, Raoul S, Sixel-Doering F, Hellwig D, Gharabaghi A, Kruger R, Pinsker MO, Amtage F, Regis JM, Witjas T, Thobois S, Mertens P, Kloss M, Hartmann A, Oertel WH, Post B, Speelman H, Agid Y, Schade-Brittinger C, Deuschl G; EARLYSTIM Study Group. Neurostimulation for Parkinson's disease with early motor complications. N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 14;368(7):610-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205158.

    PMID: 23406026BACKGROUND
  • Odekerken VJ, van Laar T, Staal MJ, Mosch A, Hoffmann CF, Nijssen PC, Beute GN, van Vugt JP, Lenders MW, Contarino MF, Mink MS, Bour LJ, van den Munckhof P, Schmand BA, de Haan RJ, Schuurman PR, de Bie RM. Subthalamic nucleus versus globus pallidus bilateral deep brain stimulation for advanced Parkinson's disease (NSTAPS study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2013 Jan;12(1):37-44. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70264-8. Epub 2012 Nov 16.

    PMID: 23168021BACKGROUND
  • Koeglsperger T, Palleis C, Hell F, Mehrkens JH, Botzel K. Deep Brain Stimulation Programming for Movement Disorders: Current Concepts and Evidence-Based Strategies. Front Neurol. 2019 May 21;10:410. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00410. eCollection 2019.

    PMID: 31231293BACKGROUND
  • Kern DS, Picillo M, Thompson JA, Sammartino F, di Biase L, Munhoz RP, Fasano A. Interleaving Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease, Tremor, and Dystonia. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2018;96(6):379-391. doi: 10.1159/000494983. Epub 2019 Jan 17.

    PMID: 30654368BACKGROUND
  • Zhang S, Zhou P, Jiang S, Wang W, Li P. Interleaving subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation to avoid side effects while achieving satisfactory motor benefits in Parkinson disease: A report of 12 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Dec;95(49):e5575. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005575.

    PMID: 27930569BACKGROUND
  • Franca C, Barbosa ER, Iglesio R, Teixeira MJ, Cury RG. Interleaving Stimulation in Parkinson Disease: Interesting to Whom? World Neurosurg. 2019 Oct;130:e786-e793. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.223. Epub 2019 Jul 8.

    PMID: 31295615BACKGROUND
  • Khabarova EA, Denisova NP, Dmitriev AB, Slavin KV, Verhagen Metman L. Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus in Patients with Parkinson Disease with Prior Pallidotomy or Thalamotomy. Brain Sci. 2018 Apr 16;8(4):66. doi: 10.3390/brainsci8040066.

    PMID: 29659494BACKGROUND
  • Bouthour W, Bereau M, Kibleur A, Zacharia A, Tomkova Chaoui E, Fleury V, Benis D, Momjian S, Bally J, Luscher C, Krack P, Burkhard PR. Dyskinesia-inducing lead contacts optimize outcome of subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2019 Nov;34(11):1728-1734. doi: 10.1002/mds.27853. Epub 2019 Sep 30.

    PMID: 31571277BACKGROUND
  • Picillo M, Lozano AM, Kou N, Puppi Munhoz R, Fasano A. Programming Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: The Toronto Western Hospital Algorithms. Brain Stimul. 2016 May-Jun;9(3):425-437. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Feb 12.

    PMID: 26968806BACKGROUND
  • Aquino CC, Duffley G, Hedges DM, Vorwerk J, House PA, Ferraz HB, Rolston JD, Butson CR, Schrock LE. Interleaved deep brain stimulation for dyskinesia management in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2019 Nov;34(11):1722-1727. doi: 10.1002/mds.27839. Epub 2019 Sep 4.

    PMID: 31483534BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Parkinsonian DisordersBasal Ganglia DiseasesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesMovement DisordersSynucleinopathiesNeurodegenerative Diseases

Study Officials

  • Feng-Tao Liu, MD

    Huashan Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Randomization is done by computer-generated pairwise according to order of enrolment, so that similar numbers of patients are recruited to each study group. The chief investigator generates the randomization sequence. The randomization scheme is kept in sealed envelopes. The randomization sequence was revealed only to the unmasked clinician responsible for the stimulation programming, but not to the rater. Patients were masked to randomisation group.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: 50 Patients will be randomly assigned to either the interleaving stimulation modes group (ISG) or the empirical stimulation modes group (ESG). ISG: empirical stimulation for the first 3 months, followed by interleaving programming period for 6 months, and any stimulation decided by the neurologists/neurosurgeons for the final 3 months. ESG: empirical programming for the first 9 months' period, followed by any stimulation decided by the neurologists/neurosurgeons for the final 3 months.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of neuroloy department

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 14, 2023

First Posted

February 2, 2024

Study Start

March 1, 2022

Primary Completion

December 1, 2024

Study Completion

February 28, 2025

Last Updated

February 2, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations