Interleaving Stimulation Improves Dyskinesia in Parkinson's Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is designed as a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study to assess putative differences in the effect of interleaving stimulation and empirical stimulation with regards to post-operation dyskinesia control. The primary objective is to assess putative differences in the effect of interleaving stimulation and empirical stimulation with regards to dyskinesia control.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 14, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 2, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2025
CompletedFebruary 2, 2024
January 1, 2024
2.8 years
December 14, 2023
January 25, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
dyskinesia scores (United Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part IV, item 32 + item 33)
Measure the changes of dyskinesia scores (United Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part IV, item 32 + item 33) in interleaving stimulation compared to empirical programming modes. The total scores range from 0 (good health) to 4 (poor health).
3 months and 9 months
Parkinson's disease quality of life-39 (PDQ-39) scores
Measure the changes of Parkinson's disease quality of life-39 (PDQ-39) scores in interleaving stimulation compared to empirical programming modes. The total scores range from 0 (good health) to 156 (poor health).
3 months and 9 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
scores of United Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III
3 months and 9 months
Montreal cognitive assessment scores
3 months and 9 months
Study Arms (2)
empirical stimulation modes group (ESG)
ACTIVE COMPARATORempirical programming for the first 9 months' period, followed by any stimulation decided by the neurologists/neurosurgeons for the final 3 months.
interleaving stimulation modes group (ISG)
EXPERIMENTALempirical stimulation for the first 3 months, followed by interleaving programming period for 6 months, and any stimulation decided by the neurologists/neurosurgeons for the final 3 months.
Interventions
ILS consists of two rapid and alternate stimulation programs with different contacts, amplitudes, and pulse width but the same frequency up to a maximum of 125Hz. Contact selection is determined by postoperative stereotactic computed tomography and clinical evaluation to achieve a balance between motor improvement and tolerable side effects. For example, ILS is successfully applied for PD motor symptoms (stimulation of subthalamic nucleus) as well as dyskinesia (additional stimulation of zona incerta).
Patients are settled with simple polar stimulation with combined parameters adjustment (monopolar mode, 60\~90µs pulse width, 130\~185Hz frequency and varied voltage) during the follow-up.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \. Patients at the age of 30-65 years old. 2. Patients diagnosed as Parkinson's disease according to the UK Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank criteria.
- \. Patients at Hoehn and Yahr stage 3 or lower in the on-state and stage 2 - 4 in the off-state.
- \. The disease duration of 5 years or more. 5. Patients with deep levodopa-responsive Parkinson's disease, and are not adequately controlled by drug therapy.
You may not qualify if:
- major illness or medical comorbidities, depression that is untreated but judged to be clinically significant by an investigator, cochlear implants, cardiac pacemakers, needs for diathermy, anticoagulant therapy, previous neuro-surgical procedure or ablative therapy, frank dementia according to cognitive screening, drug or alcohol abuse, being a woman of child-bearing potential, having a positive pregnancy test, or presence of a terminal illness.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Huashan Hospitallead
- Medtroniccollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Huashan Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200040, China
Related Publications (11)
Wiens BL, Iglewicz B. Design and analysis of three treatment equivalence trials. Control Clin Trials. 2000 Apr;21(2):127-37. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(99)00052-5.
PMID: 10715510BACKGROUNDSchuepbach WM, Rau J, Knudsen K, Volkmann J, Krack P, Timmermann L, Halbig TD, Hesekamp H, Navarro SM, Meier N, Falk D, Mehdorn M, Paschen S, Maarouf M, Barbe MT, Fink GR, Kupsch A, Gruber D, Schneider GH, Seigneuret E, Kistner A, Chaynes P, Ory-Magne F, Brefel Courbon C, Vesper J, Schnitzler A, Wojtecki L, Houeto JL, Bataille B, Maltete D, Damier P, Raoul S, Sixel-Doering F, Hellwig D, Gharabaghi A, Kruger R, Pinsker MO, Amtage F, Regis JM, Witjas T, Thobois S, Mertens P, Kloss M, Hartmann A, Oertel WH, Post B, Speelman H, Agid Y, Schade-Brittinger C, Deuschl G; EARLYSTIM Study Group. Neurostimulation for Parkinson's disease with early motor complications. N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 14;368(7):610-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205158.
PMID: 23406026BACKGROUNDOdekerken VJ, van Laar T, Staal MJ, Mosch A, Hoffmann CF, Nijssen PC, Beute GN, van Vugt JP, Lenders MW, Contarino MF, Mink MS, Bour LJ, van den Munckhof P, Schmand BA, de Haan RJ, Schuurman PR, de Bie RM. Subthalamic nucleus versus globus pallidus bilateral deep brain stimulation for advanced Parkinson's disease (NSTAPS study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2013 Jan;12(1):37-44. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70264-8. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
PMID: 23168021BACKGROUNDKoeglsperger T, Palleis C, Hell F, Mehrkens JH, Botzel K. Deep Brain Stimulation Programming for Movement Disorders: Current Concepts and Evidence-Based Strategies. Front Neurol. 2019 May 21;10:410. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00410. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31231293BACKGROUNDKern DS, Picillo M, Thompson JA, Sammartino F, di Biase L, Munhoz RP, Fasano A. Interleaving Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease, Tremor, and Dystonia. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2018;96(6):379-391. doi: 10.1159/000494983. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
PMID: 30654368BACKGROUNDZhang S, Zhou P, Jiang S, Wang W, Li P. Interleaving subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation to avoid side effects while achieving satisfactory motor benefits in Parkinson disease: A report of 12 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Dec;95(49):e5575. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005575.
PMID: 27930569BACKGROUNDFranca C, Barbosa ER, Iglesio R, Teixeira MJ, Cury RG. Interleaving Stimulation in Parkinson Disease: Interesting to Whom? World Neurosurg. 2019 Oct;130:e786-e793. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.223. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
PMID: 31295615BACKGROUNDKhabarova EA, Denisova NP, Dmitriev AB, Slavin KV, Verhagen Metman L. Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus in Patients with Parkinson Disease with Prior Pallidotomy or Thalamotomy. Brain Sci. 2018 Apr 16;8(4):66. doi: 10.3390/brainsci8040066.
PMID: 29659494BACKGROUNDBouthour W, Bereau M, Kibleur A, Zacharia A, Tomkova Chaoui E, Fleury V, Benis D, Momjian S, Bally J, Luscher C, Krack P, Burkhard PR. Dyskinesia-inducing lead contacts optimize outcome of subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2019 Nov;34(11):1728-1734. doi: 10.1002/mds.27853. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
PMID: 31571277BACKGROUNDPicillo M, Lozano AM, Kou N, Puppi Munhoz R, Fasano A. Programming Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: The Toronto Western Hospital Algorithms. Brain Stimul. 2016 May-Jun;9(3):425-437. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
PMID: 26968806BACKGROUNDAquino CC, Duffley G, Hedges DM, Vorwerk J, House PA, Ferraz HB, Rolston JD, Butson CR, Schrock LE. Interleaved deep brain stimulation for dyskinesia management in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2019 Nov;34(11):1722-1727. doi: 10.1002/mds.27839. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
PMID: 31483534BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Feng-Tao Liu, MD
Huashan Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Randomization is done by computer-generated pairwise according to order of enrolment, so that similar numbers of patients are recruited to each study group. The chief investigator generates the randomization sequence. The randomization scheme is kept in sealed envelopes. The randomization sequence was revealed only to the unmasked clinician responsible for the stimulation programming, but not to the rater. Patients were masked to randomisation group.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of neuroloy department
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 14, 2023
First Posted
February 2, 2024
Study Start
March 1, 2022
Primary Completion
December 1, 2024
Study Completion
February 28, 2025
Last Updated
February 2, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share