Real World Evaluation of Lunit INSIGHT MMG Technology
1 other identifier
observational
5,500
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is a single-centre prospective observational cohort study designed to assess and compare the sensitivity and specificity of a Lunit INSIGHT MMG assisted human reading to the standard care double human reading process within mammography review at a "one-stop" breast clinic (non-inferiority study). The current imaging reporting process is a sequential double read of mammography and ultrasound (if available) images, by consultant radiologists or radiographers. The first reader produces a report which is then sent to the second reader who reviews it. If the second reader agrees with the first, this is reflected in the second reader's report which translates into a decision for further action; in the event of disagreement, a third reader arbitrates and produces the final report. In the past, breast clinics have had to resort to single reader reporting due to staff shortages and high demand. This results in delays to any further assessments that may be required. It is worth noting however that despite difficulties in meeting the target, the current clinical pathway has proven to be cost effective. The Lunit INSIGHT MMG tool could generate benefits and potential efficiencies if it were introduced to the clinical service as an assistant reader within the mammography reporting process, by replacing one of the two human readers in the current standard of care. Before this can be assessed however, its non-inferiority in combination with a human reader in comparison to standard of care (double human reading) must first be established. This study will aim to address this issue in the first instance, maintaining standard of care for all patients seen within the 2 week wait pathway, by introducing the use of Lunit INSIGHT MMG into one of two arms within this prospective, observational parallel cohort study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Feb 2024
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 22, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2024
CompletedJanuary 30, 2024
January 1, 2024
9 months
January 22, 2024
January 22, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Sensitivity, specificity and cost effectiveness of Lunit INSIGHT MMG
To assess and compare the sensitivity and specificity (further follow up or not) of Lunit INSIGHT MMG combined with a single human reader for non-inferiority against double human reading
Jan-Nov 2024
Acceptability of Lunit INSIGHT MMG to patients and NHS workforce
To assess the acceptability of Lunit INSIGHT MMG to patients and NHS workforce. This will be done through a patient and workforce qualitative study involving in-depth interviews and questionnaires
Jan-Nov 2024
Cost Effectiveness of introducing Lunit INSIGHT MMG
To assess the cost effectiveness of introducing Lunit INSIGHT MMG at the 'one-stop' breast clinic
Jan-Nov 2024
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Sensitivity and specificity of the Lunit INSIGHT MMG assisted single Human reading compared to double human reading
Jan-Nov 2024
Number and proportion of non-agreement/arbitrations in the Lunit INSIGHT MMG assisted arm vs the Standard of care pathway arm
Jan-Nov 2024
Correlation between the Lunit INSIGHT MMG abnormality score and the level of confidence of human reader 1 in the Lunit result
Jan-Nov 2024
Correlation of reader level of concern score
Jan-Nov 2024
Investigation of performance of the Lunit assisted arm in sub-categories of patients
Jan-Nov 2024
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Standard Pathway Arm
All participating patients will have their mammograms reported using the standard of care. The mammograms randomised to the Standard Pathway arm will be reported using the current standard of care, which involves two human readers; The readers will be blind to Lunit INSIGHT MMG report
Lunit Assisted Arm
All participating patients will have their mammograms reported using the standard of care. Those randomised to the Lunit assisted arm will also undergo double reader process , ensuring the current standard of clinical care is provided. In addition to that, the Lunit INSIGHT MMG report will also be available to the readers. Within this arm, each reader will be presented with a Likert scale to rank their level of agreement with the Lunit INSIGHT MMG report
Interventions
In the Lunit Assisted arm, the radiographers will also be seeing the Lunit INSIGHT MMG reports while reading the mammograms. The standard of care will be followed in all the cases
Eligibility Criteria
The symptomatic breast population will be recruited from the breast service 2 week pathway referred to a 'one-stop' breast clinic
You may qualify if:
- Non-Inferiority Study
- Women 18 years of age or older.
- Referred to a "one-stop" breast clinic following GP appointment for breast symptoms.
- Patient and workforce qualitative studies Patients: as above. Workforce: Clinical staff and other key stakeholders involved in the implementation of Lunit INSIGHT MMG both male and female
- Able to undergo mammography.
You may not qualify if:
- Non-Inferiority Study
- Men will not be included in this study.
- Women who are not able to tolerate a mammogram or are unable to have one due to physical difficulties in engagement with the technology caused by immobility or being wheelchair bound.
- Patient and workforce qualitative studies Patients: as above. Workforce: Has no connection to Lunit INSIGHT MMG implementation irrespective of being male or female
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Lunit Inc.lead
- King's College Londoncollaborator
- The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trustcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Leeds, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nisha Sharma
The Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 22, 2024
First Posted
January 30, 2024
Study Start
February 1, 2024
Primary Completion
November 1, 2024
Study Completion
November 1, 2024
Last Updated
January 30, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No patient identifiable data will be shared outside of the direct care team for the main study. The qualitative interview data will only be available to the King's College Research team which also be anonymized after transcription.