Effectiveness Of Computer-Based Cognitive Training in Age-Related Cognitive Decline
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Ageing is frequently accompanied by physiological changes that might result in a deterioration in physical and cognitive abilities, which frequently leads to institutionalization or the loss of autonomy. Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is an intermediate state between normal cognitive aging and early dementia, the optimal period to intervene with preventive strategies and early treatments. Thus, the current study intends to investigate the effects of aerobic and computer-based cognitive training on age-related cognitive decline. Methods: This is a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment (n = 60) will be randomized to 2 arms and treated for 12 weeks: arm 1 (aerobic exercise and computerized cognitive training) and arm 2 (Placebo; will not receive any intervention). Outcome measure used were Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) test, Barthel Index (BI) and short form survey-12 (SF-12). Statistical Analysis: To compare the baseline characteristics and outcome variables between the two groups, independent t-tests was employed. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA was utilized to determine the interaction effect of time (baseline, post-treatment, and follow-up) and group (intervention vs. control) on the outcome measures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 5, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 26, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 25, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 12, 2025
CompletedJuly 29, 2025
July 1, 2025
12 months
January 5, 2024
July 24, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Montreal Cognitive Assessment test
A commonly used test to assess different cognitive domains, including short-term memory recall, visuospatial abilities, executive functions, attention, concentration, and working memory. MoCA scores range between 0 and 30 where the highest score is considered to be normal.
at the baseline (day 0), at the end of the treatment (after 12 weeks) as well as after 4 weeks of follow up (after 16 weeks)
Barthel Index
This index was used to measure an individual's capacity to perform ten activities of daily living, reflecting their functional independence. Total possible scores range from 0 - 20, with lower scores indicating increased disability.
at the baseline (day 0), at the end of the treatment (after 12 weeks) as well as after 4 weeks of follow up (after 16 weeks)
Short form survey-12
A generic measure utilized to assess the health-related quality of life, covering both physical and mental health dimensions. The summary scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100. Higher the SF-12 scores, indicates the higher (better) quality of life.
at the baseline (day 0), at the end of the treatment (after 12 weeks) as well as after 4 weeks of follow up (after 16 weeks)
Study Arms (2)
Interventional Group (Aerobic Exercise and Computerized Cognitive Training)
EXPERIMENTALAerobic Exercise (AE) included walk briskly, increasing intensity and duration progressively. The first week they had to walk 30 min per day, 3 days per week, up to 9-10 on the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale (BRPES; Borg, 1982) perceived as light intensity; during the second week, the duration was increased to 45 min and the intensity 9-10 and frequency (3 days per week) were maintained; the following 10 weeks they maintained the duration (45 min) and frequency (3 days per week) and increased the intensity up to 12-14 on BRPES perceived as moderate-high effort. Computerized Cognitive Training (CCT) included a multidomain computer-based cognitive training using the brainHQ software in sessions of 45 min, 3 days per week for 12 weeks. Cognitive tasks targeted attention, recognition, colour and shape, identification, calculation, visual perception, visual spatial processing, memory, and executive function).
Control Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants were exposed to balancing, coordination, stretching, and core exercises. Additionally, they attended brain health lectures to provide a comparative non-interactive cognitive engagement. Both the exercises and lectures were scheduled similar to the intervention group over 12 weeks.
Interventions
Aerobic Exercise (AE) included walk briskly, increasing intensity and duration progressively. The first week they had to walk 30 min per day, 3 days per week, up to 9-10 on the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale (BRPES; Borg, 1982) perceived as light intensity; during the second week, the duration was increased to 45 min and the intensity 9-10 and frequency (3 days per week) were maintained; the following 10 weeks they maintained the duration (45 min) and frequency (3 days per week) and increased the intensity up to 12-14 on BRPES perceived as moderate-high effort. Computerized Cognitive Training (CCT) included a multidomain computer-based cognitive training using the brainHQ software in sessions of 45 min, 3 days per week for 12 weeks. Cognitive tasks targeted attention, recognition, colour and shape, identification, calculation, visual perception, visual spatial processing, memory, and executive function.
Participants were exposed to balancing, coordination, stretching, and core exercises. Additionally, they attended brain health lectures to provide a comparative non-interactive cognitive engagement. Both the exercises and lectures were scheduled similar to the intervention group over 12 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Who fulfilled MCI criteria \[10\]: (1) subjective cognitive concerns; (2) objective cognitive impairment in memory, executive function, attention, and/or language; (3) preserved activities of daily living; and (4) absence of dementia
- Literate
- Had adequate visual, auditory, and fine motor skills.
You may not qualify if:
- Major depression (scored \> 9 in the Geriatric Depression Scale, GDS-15) \[11\]
- Schizophrenia
- Substance abuse
- parkinsonism
- conditions affecting gait (eg, severe osteoarthritis, previous stroke),
- participated in any cognitive training program during last 6 months \> 2 h/week
- ACSM contraindications to exercise or other factors that make exercise impossible or unsafe
- cognitive enhancers, or anticholinergics
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Jazan University
Jizan, Saudi Arabia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 5, 2024
First Posted
January 26, 2024
Study Start
January 15, 2024
Primary Completion
December 25, 2024
Study Completion
February 12, 2025
Last Updated
July 29, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share